Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes

Background Despite the importance of the gut microbiome on physical performance and health, little is known on the impact of training on an athlete’s gut health.Objective This study investigates the effect of training load on markers of gut health.Methods Whole stool (24 h) samples were collected fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Charlesson, J. Jones, C. Abbiss, P. Peeling, S. Watts, C.T. Christophersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15502783.2025.2507952
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850124996110712832
author B. Charlesson
J. Jones
C. Abbiss
P. Peeling
S. Watts
C.T. Christophersen
author_facet B. Charlesson
J. Jones
C. Abbiss
P. Peeling
S. Watts
C.T. Christophersen
author_sort B. Charlesson
collection DOAJ
description Background Despite the importance of the gut microbiome on physical performance and health, little is known on the impact of training on an athlete’s gut health.Objective This study investigates the effect of training load on markers of gut health.Methods Whole stool (24 h) samples were collected from 23 highly trained rowers (mean ± SD; age 19.2 ± 1.1 y; weight 80.1 ± 11.4 kg; height 1.83 ± 0.09 m) following periods of high (HT) and low training load (LT). The microbiome and short-chain fatty acid concentrations were characterized from the whole stool samples. Three-day weighted food records were used to determine diet quality (ADIcore), macronutrient, and fiber intakes during HT and LT.Results By design, training duration (147%) and intensity (130%) were greater during HT, compared with LT (p < 0.001). Carbohydrate, fat, protein, and fiber intake remained stable, but ADIcore was higher in HT (55 ± 10) compared with LT (49 ± 9; t(15) = 2.78, p = 0.014; CI: 1.34 to 10.155). Stool frequency (1.11 ± 0.47 vs 0.67 ± 0.76; p = 0.007) was greater in HT compared with LT, and a greater number of participants were unable to produce a stool sample during LT (8% vs 47%). Short chain fatty acid (SCFA), propionic (120.64 ± 30.06 mm vs 91.35 ± 34.91 mm; p = 0.007), and butyric acid (104.76 ± 50.02 vs 64.23 ± 22.05 mm, p = 0.003) concentrations were greater in HT compared with LT. Alpha diversity, Shannon–Wiener diversity index (3.43 ± 0.37 vs 3.67 ± 0.34, p = 0.09) was lower in HT than LT. The abundance of the dominant Bacteroidia was greater at HT compared to LT and ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidota (n = 16, 1.31 ± 1.19 vs 4.29 ± 3.88, t(15) = -3.44, p = 0.04, CI = -4.82 to −1.13) was lower in HT compared to LT.Conclusion Results of this study indicate that gut microbiome, SCFA concentrations, stool frequency, and diet quality vary between periods of high and low training load in athletes. The relationship between these factors and impact of such changes in gut health is currently unclear and warrants further investigation.
format Article
id doaj-art-151cacd7b8a84d49861a567cf7815ad4
institution OA Journals
issn 1550-2783
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
spelling doaj-art-151cacd7b8a84d49861a567cf7815ad42025-08-20T02:34:12ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition1550-27832025-12-0122110.1080/15502783.2025.2507952Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletesB. Charlesson0J. Jones1C. Abbiss2P. Peeling3S. Watts4C.T. Christophersen5Edith Cowan University, School of Medical and Health Science, Perth, AustraliaEdith Cowan University, School of Medical and Health Science, Perth, AustraliaEdith Cowan University, School of Medical and Health Science, Perth, AustraliaWestern Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, AustraliaWestern Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, AustraliaEdith Cowan University, School of Medical and Health Science, Perth, AustraliaBackground Despite the importance of the gut microbiome on physical performance and health, little is known on the impact of training on an athlete’s gut health.Objective This study investigates the effect of training load on markers of gut health.Methods Whole stool (24 h) samples were collected from 23 highly trained rowers (mean ± SD; age 19.2 ± 1.1 y; weight 80.1 ± 11.4 kg; height 1.83 ± 0.09 m) following periods of high (HT) and low training load (LT). The microbiome and short-chain fatty acid concentrations were characterized from the whole stool samples. Three-day weighted food records were used to determine diet quality (ADIcore), macronutrient, and fiber intakes during HT and LT.Results By design, training duration (147%) and intensity (130%) were greater during HT, compared with LT (p < 0.001). Carbohydrate, fat, protein, and fiber intake remained stable, but ADIcore was higher in HT (55 ± 10) compared with LT (49 ± 9; t(15) = 2.78, p = 0.014; CI: 1.34 to 10.155). Stool frequency (1.11 ± 0.47 vs 0.67 ± 0.76; p = 0.007) was greater in HT compared with LT, and a greater number of participants were unable to produce a stool sample during LT (8% vs 47%). Short chain fatty acid (SCFA), propionic (120.64 ± 30.06 mm vs 91.35 ± 34.91 mm; p = 0.007), and butyric acid (104.76 ± 50.02 vs 64.23 ± 22.05 mm, p = 0.003) concentrations were greater in HT compared with LT. Alpha diversity, Shannon–Wiener diversity index (3.43 ± 0.37 vs 3.67 ± 0.34, p = 0.09) was lower in HT than LT. The abundance of the dominant Bacteroidia was greater at HT compared to LT and ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidota (n = 16, 1.31 ± 1.19 vs 4.29 ± 3.88, t(15) = -3.44, p = 0.04, CI = -4.82 to −1.13) was lower in HT compared to LT.Conclusion Results of this study indicate that gut microbiome, SCFA concentrations, stool frequency, and diet quality vary between periods of high and low training load in athletes. The relationship between these factors and impact of such changes in gut health is currently unclear and warrants further investigation.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15502783.2025.2507952Gut healthexerciseshort chain fatty acidsmicrobiotatransit timediet quality
spellingShingle B. Charlesson
J. Jones
C. Abbiss
P. Peeling
S. Watts
C.T. Christophersen
Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Gut health
exercise
short chain fatty acids
microbiota
transit time
diet quality
title Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes
title_full Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes
title_fullStr Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes
title_full_unstemmed Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes
title_short Training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes
title_sort training load influences gut microbiome of highly trained rowing athletes
topic Gut health
exercise
short chain fatty acids
microbiota
transit time
diet quality
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15502783.2025.2507952
work_keys_str_mv AT bcharlesson trainingloadinfluencesgutmicrobiomeofhighlytrainedrowingathletes
AT jjones trainingloadinfluencesgutmicrobiomeofhighlytrainedrowingathletes
AT cabbiss trainingloadinfluencesgutmicrobiomeofhighlytrainedrowingathletes
AT ppeeling trainingloadinfluencesgutmicrobiomeofhighlytrainedrowingathletes
AT swatts trainingloadinfluencesgutmicrobiomeofhighlytrainedrowingathletes
AT ctchristophersen trainingloadinfluencesgutmicrobiomeofhighlytrainedrowingathletes