A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance

This review examines Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technology, which generates electricity using organic fluids at low temperature ranges. To enhance the efficiency of basic ORC systems, they are often adapted into Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (R-ORC) systems. The review highlights the dimension...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serdal Damarseckin, Sebe Yves Junior Kane, Ayhan Atiz, Mehmet Karakilcik, Haci Sogukpinar, Ismail Bozkurt, Saadin Oyucu, Ahmet Aksoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024166066
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850244874813571072
author Serdal Damarseckin
Sebe Yves Junior Kane
Ayhan Atiz
Mehmet Karakilcik
Haci Sogukpinar
Ismail Bozkurt
Saadin Oyucu
Ahmet Aksoz
author_facet Serdal Damarseckin
Sebe Yves Junior Kane
Ayhan Atiz
Mehmet Karakilcik
Haci Sogukpinar
Ismail Bozkurt
Saadin Oyucu
Ahmet Aksoz
author_sort Serdal Damarseckin
collection DOAJ
description This review examines Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technology, which generates electricity using organic fluids at low temperature ranges. To enhance the efficiency of basic ORC systems, they are often adapted into Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (R-ORC) systems. The review highlights the dimensions of economic, energy, and exergy efficiency, which are critical for practical application. Factors like the choice of working fluid, heat source temperature, and heat exchanger efficiency significantly affect economic feasibility; suboptimal choices can reduce returns and hinder project viability. Strategic decisions can improve economic outcomes and make ORC technology more appealing, as improved efficiency often leads to better economic performance through increased energy output and reduced operational costs. ORC and R-ORC systems promote sustainable energy production by enhancing energy efficiency in various applications, including geothermal power plants, industrial waste heat recovery, biomass energy production, and solar power plants. By enabling electricity generation even at low temperatures, these systems efficiently utilize existing energy sources, reduce dependence on fossil fuels, and minimize environmental impacts, thus providing both economic and ecological benefits. Additionally, when the studies conducted are examined, R-ORC exhibits higher performance than basic ORC. R-ORC is significantly superior to ORC in terms of both energy and exergy efficiency. Specifically, in terms of energy efficiency, R-ORC has been found to be 1.83 %–25.5 % more efficient. Regarding exergy efficiency, R-ORC demonstrates approximately 7.69 % better performance. Furthermore, due to these increases in efficiency, it has been determined that R-ORC also provides a more positive economic contribution compared to ORC. Thus, comparisons between ORC and R-ORC systems play a significant role in sustainable energy production and offer valuable guidance for future research. The limitations of ORC and R-ORC systems include limited efficiency due to low temperature differentials, the environmental impact of the organic fluids used, and high costs.
format Article
id doaj-art-14fc8992064f4b49a43cd497bee73164
institution OA Journals
issn 2405-8440
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj-art-14fc8992064f4b49a43cd497bee731642025-08-20T01:59:38ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402024-12-011023e4057510.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40575A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performanceSerdal Damarseckin0Sebe Yves Junior Kane1Ayhan Atiz2Mehmet Karakilcik3Haci Sogukpinar4Ismail Bozkurt5Saadin Oyucu6Ahmet Aksoz7Sırnak University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Energy Systems Engineering, 73000, Sırnak, TurkeyDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Letters, University of Cukurova, Adana, 01250, TurkeyDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Letters, University of Cukurova, Adana, 01250, TurkeyDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Letters, University of Cukurova, Adana, 01250, TurkeyDepartment of Electric and Energy, Vocational School, University of Adiyaman, Adiyaman, 02040, TurkeyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Adiyaman, Adiyaman, 02040, Turkey; Corresponding author.Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adıyaman University, 02040, Adıyaman, TurkeyMOBILERS Team, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58350, Sivas, TurkeyThis review examines Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technology, which generates electricity using organic fluids at low temperature ranges. To enhance the efficiency of basic ORC systems, they are often adapted into Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (R-ORC) systems. The review highlights the dimensions of economic, energy, and exergy efficiency, which are critical for practical application. Factors like the choice of working fluid, heat source temperature, and heat exchanger efficiency significantly affect economic feasibility; suboptimal choices can reduce returns and hinder project viability. Strategic decisions can improve economic outcomes and make ORC technology more appealing, as improved efficiency often leads to better economic performance through increased energy output and reduced operational costs. ORC and R-ORC systems promote sustainable energy production by enhancing energy efficiency in various applications, including geothermal power plants, industrial waste heat recovery, biomass energy production, and solar power plants. By enabling electricity generation even at low temperatures, these systems efficiently utilize existing energy sources, reduce dependence on fossil fuels, and minimize environmental impacts, thus providing both economic and ecological benefits. Additionally, when the studies conducted are examined, R-ORC exhibits higher performance than basic ORC. R-ORC is significantly superior to ORC in terms of both energy and exergy efficiency. Specifically, in terms of energy efficiency, R-ORC has been found to be 1.83 %–25.5 % more efficient. Regarding exergy efficiency, R-ORC demonstrates approximately 7.69 % better performance. Furthermore, due to these increases in efficiency, it has been determined that R-ORC also provides a more positive economic contribution compared to ORC. Thus, comparisons between ORC and R-ORC systems play a significant role in sustainable energy production and offer valuable guidance for future research. The limitations of ORC and R-ORC systems include limited efficiency due to low temperature differentials, the environmental impact of the organic fluids used, and high costs.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024166066Thermal and exergy efficienciesEnergy conversionORC and R-ORCElectricity generationOrganic fluids
spellingShingle Serdal Damarseckin
Sebe Yves Junior Kane
Ayhan Atiz
Mehmet Karakilcik
Haci Sogukpinar
Ismail Bozkurt
Saadin Oyucu
Ahmet Aksoz
A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance
Heliyon
Thermal and exergy efficiencies
Energy conversion
ORC and R-ORC
Electricity generation
Organic fluids
title A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance
title_full A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance
title_fullStr A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance
title_full_unstemmed A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance
title_short A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance
title_sort comparative review of orc and r orc technologies in terms of energy exergy and economic performance
topic Thermal and exergy efficiencies
Energy conversion
ORC and R-ORC
Electricity generation
Organic fluids
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024166066
work_keys_str_mv AT serdaldamarseckin acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT sebeyvesjuniorkane acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT ayhanatiz acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT mehmetkarakilcik acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT hacisogukpinar acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT ismailbozkurt acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT saadinoyucu acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT ahmetaksoz acomparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT serdaldamarseckin comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT sebeyvesjuniorkane comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT ayhanatiz comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT mehmetkarakilcik comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT hacisogukpinar comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT ismailbozkurt comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT saadinoyucu comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance
AT ahmetaksoz comparativereviewoforcandrorctechnologiesintermsofenergyexergyandeconomicperformance