Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK

Objective To evaluate the appropriateness of the initial prescribed daily dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) according to label in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the UK.Design Population-based cross-sectional study.Setting UK primary care.Populatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mar Martín-Pérez, Luis Alberto García Rodríguez, Pareen Vora, Luke Roberts, Yanina Balabanova, Gunnar Brobert, Samuel Fatoba, Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik, Bernhard Schaefer, Ana Ruigomez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e031341.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850266408596799488
author Mar Martín-Pérez
Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Pareen Vora
Luke Roberts
Yanina Balabanova
Gunnar Brobert
Samuel Fatoba
Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik
Bernhard Schaefer
Ana Ruigomez
author_facet Mar Martín-Pérez
Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Pareen Vora
Luke Roberts
Yanina Balabanova
Gunnar Brobert
Samuel Fatoba
Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik
Bernhard Schaefer
Ana Ruigomez
author_sort Mar Martín-Pérez
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate the appropriateness of the initial prescribed daily dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) according to label in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the UK.Design Population-based cross-sectional study.Setting UK primary care.Population 30 467 patients with NVAF and a first prescription for apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban between January 2011 and December 2016.Main outcome measures Percentage of patients prescribed a NOAC dose according to the European Union (EU) labels (appropriately dosed), and not according to the EU labels (inappropriately dosed—including both underdosed and overdosed patients); percentage of patients prescribed an initial NOAC dose according to renal function status.Results A total of 15 252 (50.1%) patients started NOAC therapy on rivaroxaban, 10 834 (35.6%) on apixaban and 4381 (14.4%) on dabigatran. Among patients starting NOAC therapy on rivaroxaban, 17.3% were eligible to receive a reduced dose compared with 12.8% of patients starting on apixaban and 53.8% of patients starting on dabigatran. The majority of patients were prescribed an appropriate dose according to the EU labels: apixaban 74.9 %, dabigatran, 74.4%; rivaroxaban, 84.2%. Underdosing occurred in 21.6% (apixaban), 8.7% (dabigatran), 9.1% (rivaroxaban). Overdosing was more frequent for dabigatran (16.9%) than for rivaroxaban (6.6%) or apixaban (3.5%). There was a trend towards dose reduction with increasing renal impairment. Among patients with severe renal impairment, the majority received a reduced dose NOAC: apixaban, 91.1%, dabigatran, 80.0%, rivaroxaban, 83.0%.Conclusion Between 2011 and 2016, the majority of patients starting NOAC therapy in UK primary care were prescribed a daily dose in line with the approved EU drug label. Underdosing was more than twice as common among patients starting on apixaban than those starting on dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Research into the patient characteristics that may influence inappropriate underdosing of NOACs in UK primary care is warranted.
format Article
id doaj-art-14eeed74c60b4b9983ccf28adcc7532d
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-14eeed74c60b4b9983ccf28adcc7532d2025-08-20T01:54:11ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-09-019910.1136/bmjopen-2019-031341Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UKMar Martín-Pérez0Luis Alberto García Rodríguez1Pareen Vora2Luke Roberts3Yanina Balabanova4Gunnar Brobert5Samuel Fatoba6Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik7Bernhard Schaefer8Ana Ruigomez91 Pharmacoepidemiology, Spanish Centre for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research (CEIFE), Madrid, SpainSpanish Centre for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research, Madrid, SpainBayer AG, Berlin, Germany3 Study Medical Experts, Bayer PLC, Reading, UK2 Epidemiology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany3 Epidemiology, Bayer AB, Stockholm, Sweden5 Medical Affairs, Bayer PLC, Reading, UKBayer AG, Berlin, Germany2 Epidemiology, Bayer AG, Berlin, GermanySpanish Centre for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research, Madrid, SpainObjective To evaluate the appropriateness of the initial prescribed daily dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) according to label in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the UK.Design Population-based cross-sectional study.Setting UK primary care.Population 30 467 patients with NVAF and a first prescription for apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban between January 2011 and December 2016.Main outcome measures Percentage of patients prescribed a NOAC dose according to the European Union (EU) labels (appropriately dosed), and not according to the EU labels (inappropriately dosed—including both underdosed and overdosed patients); percentage of patients prescribed an initial NOAC dose according to renal function status.Results A total of 15 252 (50.1%) patients started NOAC therapy on rivaroxaban, 10 834 (35.6%) on apixaban and 4381 (14.4%) on dabigatran. Among patients starting NOAC therapy on rivaroxaban, 17.3% were eligible to receive a reduced dose compared with 12.8% of patients starting on apixaban and 53.8% of patients starting on dabigatran. The majority of patients were prescribed an appropriate dose according to the EU labels: apixaban 74.9 %, dabigatran, 74.4%; rivaroxaban, 84.2%. Underdosing occurred in 21.6% (apixaban), 8.7% (dabigatran), 9.1% (rivaroxaban). Overdosing was more frequent for dabigatran (16.9%) than for rivaroxaban (6.6%) or apixaban (3.5%). There was a trend towards dose reduction with increasing renal impairment. Among patients with severe renal impairment, the majority received a reduced dose NOAC: apixaban, 91.1%, dabigatran, 80.0%, rivaroxaban, 83.0%.Conclusion Between 2011 and 2016, the majority of patients starting NOAC therapy in UK primary care were prescribed a daily dose in line with the approved EU drug label. Underdosing was more than twice as common among patients starting on apixaban than those starting on dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Research into the patient characteristics that may influence inappropriate underdosing of NOACs in UK primary care is warranted.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e031341.full
spellingShingle Mar Martín-Pérez
Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Pareen Vora
Luke Roberts
Yanina Balabanova
Gunnar Brobert
Samuel Fatoba
Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik
Bernhard Schaefer
Ana Ruigomez
Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK
BMJ Open
title Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK
title_full Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK
title_fullStr Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK
title_short Appropriateness of initial dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK
title_sort appropriateness of initial dose of non vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation in the uk
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e031341.full
work_keys_str_mv AT marmartinperez appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT luisalbertogarciarodriguez appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT pareenvora appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT lukeroberts appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT yaninabalabanova appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT gunnarbrobert appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT samuelfatoba appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT kilianasuzartwoischnik appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT bernhardschaefer appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk
AT anaruigomez appropriatenessofinitialdoseofnonvitaminkantagonistoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationintheuk