Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours

ABSTRACT Monitoring cetaceans is essential for evaluating ecosystem health and informing the establishment of marine protected areas. Conventional cetacean monitoring techniques, such as photo‐identification, acoustic surveys, and satellite tagging, are often resource‐intensive, costly, and sometime...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Kelly Rodriguez, Belén García Ovide, Eleonora Barbaccia, Jana Robertson, Taïme Smit Pellure, Ángela Ceballos‐Caro, Caterina Lanfredi, Maddalena Jahoda, Enrico Villa, Arianna Azzellino, Marianne Helene Rasmussen, Michael Traugott, Bettina Thalinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70103
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849434113650458624
author Lauren Kelly Rodriguez
Belén García Ovide
Eleonora Barbaccia
Jana Robertson
Taïme Smit Pellure
Ángela Ceballos‐Caro
Caterina Lanfredi
Maddalena Jahoda
Enrico Villa
Arianna Azzellino
Marianne Helene Rasmussen
Michael Traugott
Bettina Thalinger
author_facet Lauren Kelly Rodriguez
Belén García Ovide
Eleonora Barbaccia
Jana Robertson
Taïme Smit Pellure
Ángela Ceballos‐Caro
Caterina Lanfredi
Maddalena Jahoda
Enrico Villa
Arianna Azzellino
Marianne Helene Rasmussen
Michael Traugott
Bettina Thalinger
author_sort Lauren Kelly Rodriguez
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Monitoring cetaceans is essential for evaluating ecosystem health and informing the establishment of marine protected areas. Conventional cetacean monitoring techniques, such as photo‐identification, acoustic surveys, and satellite tagging, are often resource‐intensive, costly, and sometimes intrusive. Environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based methods have emerged as non‐invasive, cost‐efficient complements based on the analysis of genetic material shed into the environment. However, eDNA research is still evolving, with ongoing efforts to optimize field sampling and laboratory protocols. Building on the challenges of conventional monitoring methods, this study sought to refine eDNA sampling parameters to offer a more efficient and scalable approach for cetacean research, leveraging citizen science platforms. From June to October 2023, eDNA samples were collected across three regions in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea aboard whale‐watching vessels or monitoring platforms engaging citizen scientists. Samples were analyzed for total DNA concentration using Qubit fluorometry and target DNA concentration with quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR). Key variables tested in the field included water volume (2, 5, and 10 L), sampling timing (immediately after a whale was present and at 5‐, 10‐, and 20‐min intervals), and three filter types (pore sizes of 1.2, 0.8, and 0.45 μm). Our results illustrate that larger water volumes (10 L), sampling immediately after a whale breach or fluking behavior, and Smith‐Root eDNA filters (1.2 μm pore size) significantly increased eDNA detection probability and signal strength. However, the combination of certain filter types with different water volumes had a significant impact on detection probability, with smaller pore sizes more effectively yielding detections with a lower water volume. These findings provide guidance for future cetacean research initiatives and highlight the potential of eDNA methods in enhancing research and conservation efforts through scalable citizen science‐based initiatives.
format Article
id doaj-art-14dbf36b88614ec493b613073ae2fd44
institution Kabale University
issn 2637-4943
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Environmental DNA
spelling doaj-art-14dbf36b88614ec493b613073ae2fd442025-08-20T03:26:48ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432025-05-0173n/an/a10.1002/edn3.70103Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching ToursLauren Kelly Rodriguez0Belén García Ovide1Eleonora Barbaccia2Jana Robertson3Taïme Smit Pellure4Ángela Ceballos‐Caro5Caterina Lanfredi6Maddalena Jahoda7Enrico Villa8Arianna Azzellino9Marianne Helene Rasmussen10Michael Traugott11Bettina Thalinger12Applied Animal Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck AustriaUniversity of Iceland's Húsavík Research Center Húsavík IcelandDICA Civil and Environmental Engineering Department Politecnico di Milano Milano ItalyApplied Animal Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck AustriaOcean Missions Húsavík IcelandNational Microbiology Center Instituto de Salud Carlos III Madrid SpainTethys Research Institute Milano ItalyTethys Research Institute Milano ItalyCetacean Watching Lda Madalena do Pico Azores PortugalDICA Civil and Environmental Engineering Department Politecnico di Milano Milano ItalyUniversity of Iceland's Húsavík Research Center Húsavík IcelandApplied Animal Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck AustriaApplied Animal Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck AustriaABSTRACT Monitoring cetaceans is essential for evaluating ecosystem health and informing the establishment of marine protected areas. Conventional cetacean monitoring techniques, such as photo‐identification, acoustic surveys, and satellite tagging, are often resource‐intensive, costly, and sometimes intrusive. Environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based methods have emerged as non‐invasive, cost‐efficient complements based on the analysis of genetic material shed into the environment. However, eDNA research is still evolving, with ongoing efforts to optimize field sampling and laboratory protocols. Building on the challenges of conventional monitoring methods, this study sought to refine eDNA sampling parameters to offer a more efficient and scalable approach for cetacean research, leveraging citizen science platforms. From June to October 2023, eDNA samples were collected across three regions in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea aboard whale‐watching vessels or monitoring platforms engaging citizen scientists. Samples were analyzed for total DNA concentration using Qubit fluorometry and target DNA concentration with quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR). Key variables tested in the field included water volume (2, 5, and 10 L), sampling timing (immediately after a whale was present and at 5‐, 10‐, and 20‐min intervals), and three filter types (pore sizes of 1.2, 0.8, and 0.45 μm). Our results illustrate that larger water volumes (10 L), sampling immediately after a whale breach or fluking behavior, and Smith‐Root eDNA filters (1.2 μm pore size) significantly increased eDNA detection probability and signal strength. However, the combination of certain filter types with different water volumes had a significant impact on detection probability, with smaller pore sizes more effectively yielding detections with a lower water volume. These findings provide guidance for future cetacean research initiatives and highlight the potential of eDNA methods in enhancing research and conservation efforts through scalable citizen science‐based initiatives.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70103assayAtlantic OceandetectiondolphinseDNAMediterranean Sea
spellingShingle Lauren Kelly Rodriguez
Belén García Ovide
Eleonora Barbaccia
Jana Robertson
Taïme Smit Pellure
Ángela Ceballos‐Caro
Caterina Lanfredi
Maddalena Jahoda
Enrico Villa
Arianna Azzellino
Marianne Helene Rasmussen
Michael Traugott
Bettina Thalinger
Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours
Environmental DNA
assay
Atlantic Ocean
detection
dolphins
eDNA
Mediterranean Sea
title Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours
title_full Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours
title_fullStr Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours
title_short Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours
title_sort enhancing environmental dna sampling efficiency for cetacean detection on whale watching tours
topic assay
Atlantic Ocean
detection
dolphins
eDNA
Mediterranean Sea
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70103
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenkellyrodriguez enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT belengarciaovide enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT eleonorabarbaccia enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT janarobertson enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT taimesmitpellure enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT angelaceballoscaro enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT caterinalanfredi enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT maddalenajahoda enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT enricovilla enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT ariannaazzellino enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT mariannehelenerasmussen enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT michaeltraugott enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours
AT bettinathalinger enhancingenvironmentaldnasamplingefficiencyforcetaceandetectiononwhalewatchingtours