Cruel and Usual
In higher education, student evaluation of teaching (SET) has been under scrutiny for its lack of validity, weak correlation with student learning, and bias toward historically marginalized faculty. Absent from the literature are the psychological and financial implications of negative SETs. In an...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Mary Lourdes Silva, Josephine Walwema, Matt Thomas |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/36729 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Student Evaluations of Teaching Are Mostly Awfully Wrong
by: Noel Otu, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Mitigating Bias Due to Race and Gender in Machine Learning Predictions of Traffic Stop Outcomes
by: Kevin Saville, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Whose voice matters? Word embeddings reveal identity bias in news quotes
by: Nnaemeka Ohamadike, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Halo effect and psychological contracts in student evaluations of teaching: a case study from a leading Chinese Liberal Arts University
by: Enxi Jin, et al.
Published: (2025-12-01) -
Herman in Theory and Practice: Race and Power
by: Khadijah Costley White
Published: (2018-12-01)