Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low Carbon
ABSTRACT The distance between adjacent tunnels is relatively small, and the driver passes through the alternating light environment for a short time, which poses great safety hazards to driving. Guided by the low‐carbon concept, it is of great significance to find an optimized light environment solu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Energy Science & Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.2085 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849699693681967104 |
|---|---|
| author | Yingxia Yu Haoyu Gu Bin Liang Qianyi Sun Junjie Zou |
| author_facet | Yingxia Yu Haoyu Gu Bin Liang Qianyi Sun Junjie Zou |
| author_sort | Yingxia Yu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT The distance between adjacent tunnels is relatively small, and the driver passes through the alternating light environment for a short time, which poses great safety hazards to driving. Guided by the low‐carbon concept, it is of great significance to find an optimized light environment solution that integrates safety, low‐carbon, and economy. Based on the adjacent tunnel between Shuigou River and Songjiawa, this article evaluates and optimizes traditional lighting schemes and sunshade schemes from the above three aspects. The results show that the overall uniformity of road surface luminance for both schemes is greater than 0.313, which meets the regulatory requirements and is a feasible solution. Compared to traditional lighting schemes, the sunshade scheme reduces carbon emissions by 37.23% throughout its lifecycle, and reduces the present value of its lifecycle costs by 19.51%. From a comprehensive evaluation of the life cycle, the sunshade scheme is superior to the traditional lighting scheme. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-14bdbb7e63e24b038aa4b901e3cd9287 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2050-0505 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energy Science & Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-14bdbb7e63e24b038aa4b901e3cd92872025-08-20T03:18:31ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052025-04-011341691170510.1002/ese3.2085Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low CarbonYingxia Yu0Haoyu Gu1Bin Liang2Qianyi Sun3Junjie Zou4School of Civil Engineering and Architecture Henan University of Science and Technology Luoyang ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture Henan University of Science and Technology Luoyang ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture Henan University of Science and Technology Luoyang ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture Henan University of Science and Technology Luoyang ChinaChina Railway Seventh Bureau Group Electric Engineering Co., Ltd. Zhengzhou ChinaABSTRACT The distance between adjacent tunnels is relatively small, and the driver passes through the alternating light environment for a short time, which poses great safety hazards to driving. Guided by the low‐carbon concept, it is of great significance to find an optimized light environment solution that integrates safety, low‐carbon, and economy. Based on the adjacent tunnel between Shuigou River and Songjiawa, this article evaluates and optimizes traditional lighting schemes and sunshade schemes from the above three aspects. The results show that the overall uniformity of road surface luminance for both schemes is greater than 0.313, which meets the regulatory requirements and is a feasible solution. Compared to traditional lighting schemes, the sunshade scheme reduces carbon emissions by 37.23% throughout its lifecycle, and reduces the present value of its lifecycle costs by 19.51%. From a comprehensive evaluation of the life cycle, the sunshade scheme is superior to the traditional lighting scheme.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.2085adjacent tunnelcarbon costcarbon emissionslife cyclelight environment |
| spellingShingle | Yingxia Yu Haoyu Gu Bin Liang Qianyi Sun Junjie Zou Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low Carbon Energy Science & Engineering adjacent tunnel carbon cost carbon emissions life cycle light environment |
| title | Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low Carbon |
| title_full | Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low Carbon |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low Carbon |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low Carbon |
| title_short | Evaluation and Optimization of Adjacent Tunnel Light Environment Scheme to Low Carbon |
| title_sort | evaluation and optimization of adjacent tunnel light environment scheme to low carbon |
| topic | adjacent tunnel carbon cost carbon emissions life cycle light environment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.2085 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yingxiayu evaluationandoptimizationofadjacenttunnellightenvironmentschemetolowcarbon AT haoyugu evaluationandoptimizationofadjacenttunnellightenvironmentschemetolowcarbon AT binliang evaluationandoptimizationofadjacenttunnellightenvironmentschemetolowcarbon AT qianyisun evaluationandoptimizationofadjacenttunnellightenvironmentschemetolowcarbon AT junjiezou evaluationandoptimizationofadjacenttunnellightenvironmentschemetolowcarbon |