Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University Hospital
Digital rectal examination is used to evaluate the distal rectum and other organs, including the prostate gland. It may be combined with fecal screening for occult blood loss, and annual performance has been recommended for asymptomatic individuals over age 40 years for cancer screening. In this stu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2000-01-01
|
| Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/297390 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832566735019966464 |
|---|---|
| author | Hugh James Freeman |
| author_facet | Hugh James Freeman |
| author_sort | Hugh James Freeman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Digital rectal examination is used to evaluate the distal rectum and other organs, including the prostate gland. It may be combined with fecal screening for occult blood loss, and annual performance has been recommended for asymptomatic individuals over age 40 years for cancer screening. In this study, documentation of digital rectal examinations was assessed through a review of hospital medical records of a randomly selected group of 100 patient discharges (55 females and 45 males) from a total of 896 patients admitted through a hospital emergency room to a medical clinical teaching inpatient unit of a university hospital during a six-month period. In this group, 26% were admitted for a gastrointestinal disorder, but only 17% of all hospitalized patients had rectal examinations done by the medical resident house staff and/or attending medical staff directly responsible for the care of these patients. Occult blood testing was done in 15 patients. Pelvic and breast examinations were rarely documented. The majority of rectal examinations (ie, 13 of 17) were ’same sex’ examinations, appeared to be used largely for testing or confirmation of grossly visible blood loss and were never confirmed by attending staff. The presence or absence of nursing staff during examinations was not documented. The prostate examination was normal in one patient but not documented in the other 44 males (ie, 26 patients over age 60 years). In conclusion, rectal examinations (as well as breast and pelvic examinations) were rarely documented in the medical teaching unit by medical resident house staff or their attending staff. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-13fc32e4a3f54bfca4dda1f054aeb91b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0835-7900 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2000-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| spelling | doaj-art-13fc32e4a3f54bfca4dda1f054aeb91b2025-02-03T01:03:22ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79002000-01-0114427227610.1155/2000/297390Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University HospitalHugh James Freeman0Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaDigital rectal examination is used to evaluate the distal rectum and other organs, including the prostate gland. It may be combined with fecal screening for occult blood loss, and annual performance has been recommended for asymptomatic individuals over age 40 years for cancer screening. In this study, documentation of digital rectal examinations was assessed through a review of hospital medical records of a randomly selected group of 100 patient discharges (55 females and 45 males) from a total of 896 patients admitted through a hospital emergency room to a medical clinical teaching inpatient unit of a university hospital during a six-month period. In this group, 26% were admitted for a gastrointestinal disorder, but only 17% of all hospitalized patients had rectal examinations done by the medical resident house staff and/or attending medical staff directly responsible for the care of these patients. Occult blood testing was done in 15 patients. Pelvic and breast examinations were rarely documented. The majority of rectal examinations (ie, 13 of 17) were ’same sex’ examinations, appeared to be used largely for testing or confirmation of grossly visible blood loss and were never confirmed by attending staff. The presence or absence of nursing staff during examinations was not documented. The prostate examination was normal in one patient but not documented in the other 44 males (ie, 26 patients over age 60 years). In conclusion, rectal examinations (as well as breast and pelvic examinations) were rarely documented in the medical teaching unit by medical resident house staff or their attending staff.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/297390 |
| spellingShingle | Hugh James Freeman Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University Hospital Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| title | Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University Hospital |
| title_full | Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University Hospital |
| title_fullStr | Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University Hospital |
| title_full_unstemmed | Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University Hospital |
| title_short | Documentation of Rectal Examination Performance in the Clinical Teaching Unit of a University Hospital |
| title_sort | documentation of rectal examination performance in the clinical teaching unit of a university hospital |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/297390 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hughjamesfreeman documentationofrectalexaminationperformanceintheclinicalteachingunitofauniversityhospital |