Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
In an effort to substitute antibiotics in high-energy diets fed to feedlot cattle, probiotics have emerged as a viable alternative. In this study, increase of animals body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) were used as indicators of probiotics Limosilactobacillus (L.) fermentum CRL...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academia.edu Journals
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Academia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability |
Online Access: | https://www.academia.edu/116706367/Use_of_probiotic_lactobacilli_as_alternative_to_monensin_in_beef_feedlot_cattle |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823859662768832512 |
---|---|
author | Flavia Ivana Mansilla María Hortencia Miranda Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco Mariano Obregozo Marcela D´Urso Villar María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias Graciela Margarita Vignolo |
author_facet | Flavia Ivana Mansilla María Hortencia Miranda Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco Mariano Obregozo Marcela D´Urso Villar María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias Graciela Margarita Vignolo |
author_sort | Flavia Ivana Mansilla |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
In an effort to substitute antibiotics in high-energy diets fed to feedlot cattle, probiotics have emerged as a viable alternative. In this study, increase of animals body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) were used as indicators of probiotics Limosilactobacillus (L.) fermentum CRL2085 and L. mucosae CRL2069 (108–109 CFU/g) supplementation (individually or combined) to grain-based diets containing or not monensin during different periods of feedlot fattening cycle. Results showed that the greatest cattle BW (116.6 kg) and ADG (1.19 ± 0.17 kg/animal/day) were achieved when CRL2085 probiotic was individually supplied during 56 days (after adaptation period) in the absence of monensin (p < 0.01). In the presence of monensin, reduced BW and ADG mean values were obtained during the whole feedlot cycle (98 days) by probiotics supplementation. Thus, L. fermentum CRL2085 probiotic strain administered to feedlot cattle fed diets without monensin may result in a greater cumulative BW and ADG with a shorter administration time comparing with diets containing the ionophore. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-13d4c7de06ec4460a627f58fcd70612b |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2997-6006 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | Academia.edu Journals |
record_format | Article |
series | Academia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability |
spelling | doaj-art-13d4c7de06ec4460a627f58fcd70612b2025-02-10T23:01:15ZengAcademia.edu JournalsAcademia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability2997-60062024-03-011110.20935/AcadEnvSci6162Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattleFlavia Ivana Mansilla0María Hortencia Miranda1Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco2Mariano Obregozo3Marcela D´Urso Villar4María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias5Graciela Margarita Vignolo6Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Biostatistics Department National University of Tucuman, Ayacucho 449 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina. In an effort to substitute antibiotics in high-energy diets fed to feedlot cattle, probiotics have emerged as a viable alternative. In this study, increase of animals body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) were used as indicators of probiotics Limosilactobacillus (L.) fermentum CRL2085 and L. mucosae CRL2069 (108–109 CFU/g) supplementation (individually or combined) to grain-based diets containing or not monensin during different periods of feedlot fattening cycle. Results showed that the greatest cattle BW (116.6 kg) and ADG (1.19 ± 0.17 kg/animal/day) were achieved when CRL2085 probiotic was individually supplied during 56 days (after adaptation period) in the absence of monensin (p < 0.01). In the presence of monensin, reduced BW and ADG mean values were obtained during the whole feedlot cycle (98 days) by probiotics supplementation. Thus, L. fermentum CRL2085 probiotic strain administered to feedlot cattle fed diets without monensin may result in a greater cumulative BW and ADG with a shorter administration time comparing with diets containing the ionophore.https://www.academia.edu/116706367/Use_of_probiotic_lactobacilli_as_alternative_to_monensin_in_beef_feedlot_cattle |
spellingShingle | Flavia Ivana Mansilla María Hortencia Miranda Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco Mariano Obregozo Marcela D´Urso Villar María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias Graciela Margarita Vignolo Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle Academia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability |
title | Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle |
title_full | Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle |
title_fullStr | Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle |
title_short | Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle |
title_sort | use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle |
url | https://www.academia.edu/116706367/Use_of_probiotic_lactobacilli_as_alternative_to_monensin_in_beef_feedlot_cattle |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flaviaivanamansilla useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle AT mariahortenciamiranda useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle AT ceciliaaristimunoficoseco useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle AT marianoobregozo useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle AT marceladursovillar useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle AT mariaelenafatimanadermacias useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle AT gracielamargaritavignolo useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle |