Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle

In an effort to substitute antibiotics in high-energy diets fed to feedlot cattle, probiotics have emerged as a viable alternative. In this study, increase of animals body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) were used as indicators of probiotics Limosilactobacillus (L.) fermentum CRL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Flavia Ivana Mansilla, María Hortencia Miranda, Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco, Mariano Obregozo, Marcela D´Urso Villar, María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias, Graciela Margarita Vignolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academia.edu Journals 2024-03-01
Series:Academia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability
Online Access:https://www.academia.edu/116706367/Use_of_probiotic_lactobacilli_as_alternative_to_monensin_in_beef_feedlot_cattle
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859662768832512
author Flavia Ivana Mansilla
María Hortencia Miranda
Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco
Mariano Obregozo
Marcela D´Urso Villar
María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias
Graciela Margarita Vignolo
author_facet Flavia Ivana Mansilla
María Hortencia Miranda
Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco
Mariano Obregozo
Marcela D´Urso Villar
María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias
Graciela Margarita Vignolo
author_sort Flavia Ivana Mansilla
collection DOAJ
description In an effort to substitute antibiotics in high-energy diets fed to feedlot cattle, probiotics have emerged as a viable alternative. In this study, increase of animals body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) were used as indicators of probiotics Limosilactobacillus (L.) fermentum CRL2085 and L. mucosae CRL2069 (108–109 CFU/g) supplementation (individually or combined) to grain-based diets containing or not monensin during different periods of feedlot fattening cycle. Results showed that the greatest cattle BW (116.6 kg) and ADG (1.19 ± 0.17 kg/animal/day) were achieved when CRL2085 probiotic was individually supplied during 56 days (after adaptation period) in the absence of monensin (p < 0.01). In the presence of monensin, reduced BW and ADG mean values were obtained during the whole feedlot cycle (98 days) by probiotics supplementation. Thus, L. fermentum CRL2085 probiotic strain administered to feedlot cattle fed diets without monensin may result in a greater cumulative BW and ADG with a shorter administration time comparing with diets containing the ionophore.
format Article
id doaj-art-13d4c7de06ec4460a627f58fcd70612b
institution Kabale University
issn 2997-6006
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Academia.edu Journals
record_format Article
series Academia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability
spelling doaj-art-13d4c7de06ec4460a627f58fcd70612b2025-02-10T23:01:15ZengAcademia.edu JournalsAcademia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability2997-60062024-03-011110.20935/AcadEnvSci6162Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattleFlavia Ivana Mansilla0María Hortencia Miranda1Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco2Mariano Obregozo3Marcela D´Urso Villar4María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias5Graciela Margarita Vignolo6Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Biostatistics Department National University of Tucuman, Ayacucho 449 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina.Farmabiotics Department, Reference Center for Lactobacilli-National Council of Scientific and Technological Researchs from Argentina (CERELA-CONICET), Chacabuco 145 (4000), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina. In an effort to substitute antibiotics in high-energy diets fed to feedlot cattle, probiotics have emerged as a viable alternative. In this study, increase of animals body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) were used as indicators of probiotics Limosilactobacillus (L.) fermentum CRL2085 and L. mucosae CRL2069 (108–109 CFU/g) supplementation (individually or combined) to grain-based diets containing or not monensin during different periods of feedlot fattening cycle. Results showed that the greatest cattle BW (116.6 kg) and ADG (1.19 ± 0.17 kg/animal/day) were achieved when CRL2085 probiotic was individually supplied during 56 days (after adaptation period) in the absence of monensin (p < 0.01). In the presence of monensin, reduced BW and ADG mean values were obtained during the whole feedlot cycle (98 days) by probiotics supplementation. Thus, L. fermentum CRL2085 probiotic strain administered to feedlot cattle fed diets without monensin may result in a greater cumulative BW and ADG with a shorter administration time comparing with diets containing the ionophore.https://www.academia.edu/116706367/Use_of_probiotic_lactobacilli_as_alternative_to_monensin_in_beef_feedlot_cattle
spellingShingle Flavia Ivana Mansilla
María Hortencia Miranda
Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco
Mariano Obregozo
Marcela D´Urso Villar
María Elena Fátima Nader-Macias
Graciela Margarita Vignolo
Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
Academia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability
title Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
title_full Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
title_fullStr Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
title_full_unstemmed Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
title_short Use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
title_sort use of probiotic lactobacilli as alternative to monensin in beef feedlot cattle
url https://www.academia.edu/116706367/Use_of_probiotic_lactobacilli_as_alternative_to_monensin_in_beef_feedlot_cattle
work_keys_str_mv AT flaviaivanamansilla useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle
AT mariahortenciamiranda useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle
AT ceciliaaristimunoficoseco useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle
AT marianoobregozo useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle
AT marceladursovillar useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle
AT mariaelenafatimanadermacias useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle
AT gracielamargaritavignolo useofprobioticlactobacilliasalternativetomonensininbeeffeedlotcattle