Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.

So far, the number of patients who die from cancer is quite high. Continuation of early detection research is important to reduce the number of deaths due to cancer. At the time of the literature review, images of the same patients taken from Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Atomic Force Micro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sevcan Aytaç, Gürkan Özbey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316544
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856801291960320
author Sevcan Aytaç
Gürkan Özbey
author_facet Sevcan Aytaç
Gürkan Özbey
author_sort Sevcan Aytaç
collection DOAJ
description So far, the number of patients who die from cancer is quite high. Continuation of early detection research is important to reduce the number of deaths due to cancer. At the time of the literature review, images of the same patients taken from Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) for early diagnosis of cervix cancer have not been addressed to date. This article, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamics with SEM and AFM images are valuable in recognizing cervical cancer and starting treatment early. Simultaneous examination of the, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamics with SEM and AFM cervix images of patients will provide us with a far more powerful solution than a one-way solution. Daubechies (db2, db3, db4, and db5), Coiflet (coif5, coif4, coif3, and coif2), Symlet (sym5, sym4, sym3, and sym2), and Biorthogonal (bior1.3, bior2.8, bior1.5, and bior3.3) 16 discrete wavelet transformation families (DWTF) have been applied to AFM and SEM images. One approximate and three detail coefficients have been obtained for each one AFM and SEM cervix images. Homogeneity, contrast, angular second moment, entropy, mean, standard deviation, correlation, cluster prominence, dissimilarity, and cluster shade values have been calculated for each of these one approximate and three detail coefficients. The classification rate found by the averages of the results obtained from the DWTF_JSD, DWTF_HD and DWTF_TD algorithms for AFM and SEM cervix images are 98.29% and 97.10%, respectively. According to these results, it has been determined that SEM images have lower classification rate than AFM images. It has been also observed that the surface roughness of the mAFM images was larger than nAFM and bAFM images. But, it was observed that the volume of particles of the mAFM images has been smaller than nAFM and bAFM images.
format Article
id doaj-art-13c3aaf8cef54205a49407fc9cf0653e
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-13c3aaf8cef54205a49407fc9cf0653e2025-02-12T05:31:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01202e031654410.1371/journal.pone.0316544Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.Sevcan AytaçGürkan ÖzbeySo far, the number of patients who die from cancer is quite high. Continuation of early detection research is important to reduce the number of deaths due to cancer. At the time of the literature review, images of the same patients taken from Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) for early diagnosis of cervix cancer have not been addressed to date. This article, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamics with SEM and AFM images are valuable in recognizing cervical cancer and starting treatment early. Simultaneous examination of the, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamics with SEM and AFM cervix images of patients will provide us with a far more powerful solution than a one-way solution. Daubechies (db2, db3, db4, and db5), Coiflet (coif5, coif4, coif3, and coif2), Symlet (sym5, sym4, sym3, and sym2), and Biorthogonal (bior1.3, bior2.8, bior1.5, and bior3.3) 16 discrete wavelet transformation families (DWTF) have been applied to AFM and SEM images. One approximate and three detail coefficients have been obtained for each one AFM and SEM cervix images. Homogeneity, contrast, angular second moment, entropy, mean, standard deviation, correlation, cluster prominence, dissimilarity, and cluster shade values have been calculated for each of these one approximate and three detail coefficients. The classification rate found by the averages of the results obtained from the DWTF_JSD, DWTF_HD and DWTF_TD algorithms for AFM and SEM cervix images are 98.29% and 97.10%, respectively. According to these results, it has been determined that SEM images have lower classification rate than AFM images. It has been also observed that the surface roughness of the mAFM images was larger than nAFM and bAFM images. But, it was observed that the volume of particles of the mAFM images has been smaller than nAFM and bAFM images.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316544
spellingShingle Sevcan Aytaç
Gürkan Özbey
Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.
PLoS ONE
title Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.
title_full Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.
title_fullStr Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.
title_full_unstemmed Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.
title_short Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.
title_sort photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with sem and afm images
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316544
work_keys_str_mv AT sevcanaytac photodiagnosisandphotodynamicrecognitionofcervicalcancerwithsemandafmimages
AT gurkanozbey photodiagnosisandphotodynamicrecognitionofcervicalcancerwithsemandafmimages