From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre

Abstract Background Ophthalmic pathology at the Eye Center at Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany, looks back on a tradition of more than 150 years. Surgical specimens and associated histological diagnoses have been archived since 1945. This study is the first of its size to include 39,2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mateusz Glegola, Tabea Schulz, Simone Nuessle, Daniel Boehringer, Julia Stifter, Thomas Englbrecht, Thomas Reinhard, Johannes Haedrich, Claudia Auw-Haedrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04056-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849312151996465152
author Mateusz Glegola
Tabea Schulz
Simone Nuessle
Daniel Boehringer
Julia Stifter
Thomas Englbrecht
Thomas Reinhard
Johannes Haedrich
Claudia Auw-Haedrich
author_facet Mateusz Glegola
Tabea Schulz
Simone Nuessle
Daniel Boehringer
Julia Stifter
Thomas Englbrecht
Thomas Reinhard
Johannes Haedrich
Claudia Auw-Haedrich
author_sort Mateusz Glegola
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Ophthalmic pathology at the Eye Center at Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany, looks back on a tradition of more than 150 years. Surgical specimens and associated histological diagnoses have been archived since 1945. This study is the first of its size to include 39,256 specimens examined in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory over 71 years. Methods We retrospectively studied ophthalmic pathology reports and clinical records of histological specimens archived between 1945 and 2015 and compared our results with 22 studies from the literature. Samples were grouped by localisation and histopathological diagnoses assigned to various categories. Both were coded and entered into a database together with the year of surgery, patient sex and age at excision. Results The patients’ age at surgery was documented in 38,845 cases (99%), of which 19,601 were female (50.5%) and 19,244 were male patients (49.5%). The bimodal frequency distribution of specimens by patient age has a similar shape to that recorded 1941–1995 for Atlanta, USA and 1959–2021 for the Swedish population. Most specimens originated from the eyelid (50%), followed by cornea (16%), conjunctiva (14%), eyeball (9.1%), temporal artery (3.9%) and other locations (6.7%) comprising 16 less frequent topographies. The proportion of eyelid (corneal, conjunctival) lesions significantly increased fourfold (fivefold, twofold) during our study period (each p < .001); that of enucleations and temporal artery biopsies decreased significantly 38- and 3.6-fold (each p < .001). Concurrently, the numbers of eyelid, corneal, conjunctival and temporal artery specimens have significantly grown (each p < .001). Annual sample numbers increased significantly across the various medical directors’ tenures (1945–1967: median = 78; 1968–1987: median = 454; 1988–2002: median = 670; 2003–2015: median = 1,445) (p < .001). Conclusions Historical events, general population developments and new surgical techniques and treatment options caused changes in the occurrence of various ocular and periocular specimens. Our study data contribute to providing an overall picture of the nature and relative frequency of ocular conditions leading to surgical excision of specimens with subsequent histopathological examination. A continuous sharp increase in case numbers since 1987 clearly exceeds the demographic trend emphasising the ever-growing importance of the sub-speciality of ophthalmic pathology. Ideally, histopathological assessments should be conducted by experienced ophthalmologists with surgical and pathology expertise, or by experienced pathologists with ophthalmology expertise, to ensure optimal patient care.
format Article
id doaj-art-139940d9338e4d989f6b0edda9bc7bc7
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2415
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-139940d9338e4d989f6b0edda9bc7bc72025-08-20T03:53:11ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152025-05-0125114210.1186/s12886-025-04056-1From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centreMateusz Glegola0Tabea Schulz1Simone Nuessle2Daniel Boehringer3Julia Stifter4Thomas Englbrecht5Thomas Reinhard6Johannes Haedrich7Claudia Auw-Haedrich8Eye Center at Medical Center, University of FreiburgEye Center at Medical Center, University of FreiburgEye Center at Medical Center, University of FreiburgEye Center at Medical Center, University of FreiburgEye Center at Medical Center, University of FreiburgEye Center at Medical Center, University of FreiburgEye Center at Medical Center, University of FreiburgEye Hospital, University Hospital of BaselEye Hospital, University Hospital of BaselAbstract Background Ophthalmic pathology at the Eye Center at Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany, looks back on a tradition of more than 150 years. Surgical specimens and associated histological diagnoses have been archived since 1945. This study is the first of its size to include 39,256 specimens examined in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory over 71 years. Methods We retrospectively studied ophthalmic pathology reports and clinical records of histological specimens archived between 1945 and 2015 and compared our results with 22 studies from the literature. Samples were grouped by localisation and histopathological diagnoses assigned to various categories. Both were coded and entered into a database together with the year of surgery, patient sex and age at excision. Results The patients’ age at surgery was documented in 38,845 cases (99%), of which 19,601 were female (50.5%) and 19,244 were male patients (49.5%). The bimodal frequency distribution of specimens by patient age has a similar shape to that recorded 1941–1995 for Atlanta, USA and 1959–2021 for the Swedish population. Most specimens originated from the eyelid (50%), followed by cornea (16%), conjunctiva (14%), eyeball (9.1%), temporal artery (3.9%) and other locations (6.7%) comprising 16 less frequent topographies. The proportion of eyelid (corneal, conjunctival) lesions significantly increased fourfold (fivefold, twofold) during our study period (each p < .001); that of enucleations and temporal artery biopsies decreased significantly 38- and 3.6-fold (each p < .001). Concurrently, the numbers of eyelid, corneal, conjunctival and temporal artery specimens have significantly grown (each p < .001). Annual sample numbers increased significantly across the various medical directors’ tenures (1945–1967: median = 78; 1968–1987: median = 454; 1988–2002: median = 670; 2003–2015: median = 1,445) (p < .001). Conclusions Historical events, general population developments and new surgical techniques and treatment options caused changes in the occurrence of various ocular and periocular specimens. Our study data contribute to providing an overall picture of the nature and relative frequency of ocular conditions leading to surgical excision of specimens with subsequent histopathological examination. A continuous sharp increase in case numbers since 1987 clearly exceeds the demographic trend emphasising the ever-growing importance of the sub-speciality of ophthalmic pathology. Ideally, histopathological assessments should be conducted by experienced ophthalmologists with surgical and pathology expertise, or by experienced pathologists with ophthalmology expertise, to ensure optimal patient care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04056-1Ophthalmic pathologyEyelidCorneaConjunctivaEyeballTemporal artery
spellingShingle Mateusz Glegola
Tabea Schulz
Simone Nuessle
Daniel Boehringer
Julia Stifter
Thomas Englbrecht
Thomas Reinhard
Johannes Haedrich
Claudia Auw-Haedrich
From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre
BMC Ophthalmology
Ophthalmic pathology
Eyelid
Cornea
Conjunctiva
Eyeball
Temporal artery
title From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre
title_full From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre
title_fullStr From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre
title_full_unstemmed From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre
title_short From post-war reconstruction to the twenty-first century – ophthalmic pathology in Freiburg 1945–2015: review of 39,256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large German tertiary eye care centre
title_sort from post war reconstruction to the twenty first century ophthalmic pathology in freiburg 1945 2015 review of 39 256 surgical specimens from various topographical regions collected over 71 years at a large german tertiary eye care centre
topic Ophthalmic pathology
Eyelid
Cornea
Conjunctiva
Eyeball
Temporal artery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04056-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mateuszglegola frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT tabeaschulz frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT simonenuessle frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT danielboehringer frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT juliastifter frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT thomasenglbrecht frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT thomasreinhard frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT johanneshaedrich frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre
AT claudiaauwhaedrich frompostwarreconstructiontothetwentyfirstcenturyophthalmicpathologyinfreiburg19452015reviewof39256surgicalspecimensfromvarioustopographicalregionscollectedover71yearsatalargegermantertiaryeyecarecentre