Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases status

Background: Current decision-making for the treatment of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) using ablation lacks strong evidence, especially for patients combined with extrahepatic metastases. Purpose: To assess whether ablation plus systemic therapy (AS) improves survival outcomes in patients wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuxiazi Zou, Hong-Liang Zou, Xuan Luo, Xu-Wei Chen, Wei-Ling Huang, Chao Zhang, Ge Ren, Jin-Hua Huang, Xue Han, Yi-Quan Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Breast
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977625000050
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856881463984128
author Xuxiazi Zou
Hong-Liang Zou
Xuan Luo
Xu-Wei Chen
Wei-Ling Huang
Chao Zhang
Ge Ren
Jin-Hua Huang
Xue Han
Yi-Quan Jiang
author_facet Xuxiazi Zou
Hong-Liang Zou
Xuan Luo
Xu-Wei Chen
Wei-Ling Huang
Chao Zhang
Ge Ren
Jin-Hua Huang
Xue Han
Yi-Quan Jiang
author_sort Xuxiazi Zou
collection DOAJ
description Background: Current decision-making for the treatment of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) using ablation lacks strong evidence, especially for patients combined with extrahepatic metastases. Purpose: To assess whether ablation plus systemic therapy (AS) improves survival outcomes in patients with BCLM compared to systemic therapy alone. Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with BCLM who received either AS or systemic therapy alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) and survival analysis were performed, taking into account factors like the characteristics of primary breast cancer, liver metastases and systemic therapies received. Results: The study included 1021 female patients, with a median follow-up of 39.6 months. Of these patients, 132 underwent AS and 836 received systemic therapy alone. After PSM, among patients with BCLM (≤3 tumors, each ≤3 cm), the median overall survival (OS) for those treated with AS or systemic therapy alone was 65.5 and 40.4 months, respectively (HR = 0.48, p = .003); in the subset of patients with extrahepatic metastases, the median OS for those treated with AS and systemic therapy alone was 46.4 and 40.8 months, respectively (HR = 0.58, p = .047). Among patients with >3 cm or >3 lesions, the median OS for those treated with AS or systemic therapy alone was 45.2 and 29 months, respectively (HR = 0.67, p = .084). Conclusions: Among patients with BCLM (≤3 tumors, each ≤3 cm), AS provide longer survival compared to systemic therapy alone, even with extrahepatic metastases. For patients with larger or more numerous metastases (>3 cm or >3 lesions), AS may provide survival benefit, but further validation is needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-1395c446fabf455e97d3592fcf46d2ef
institution Kabale University
issn 1532-3080
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Breast
spelling doaj-art-1395c446fabf455e97d3592fcf46d2ef2025-02-12T05:30:39ZengElsevierBreast1532-30802025-02-0179103876Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases statusXuxiazi Zou0Hong-Liang Zou1Xuan Luo2Xu-Wei Chen3Wei-Ling Huang4Chao Zhang5Ge Ren6Jin-Hua Huang7Xue Han8Yi-Quan Jiang9Department of Breast Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, PR ChinaDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, PR ChinaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 33, Yingfeng Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, PR ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, PR ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, PR ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, PR ChinaDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong KongDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, PR ChinaDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China; Corresponding author. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China; Corresponding author. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.Background: Current decision-making for the treatment of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) using ablation lacks strong evidence, especially for patients combined with extrahepatic metastases. Purpose: To assess whether ablation plus systemic therapy (AS) improves survival outcomes in patients with BCLM compared to systemic therapy alone. Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with BCLM who received either AS or systemic therapy alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) and survival analysis were performed, taking into account factors like the characteristics of primary breast cancer, liver metastases and systemic therapies received. Results: The study included 1021 female patients, with a median follow-up of 39.6 months. Of these patients, 132 underwent AS and 836 received systemic therapy alone. After PSM, among patients with BCLM (≤3 tumors, each ≤3 cm), the median overall survival (OS) for those treated with AS or systemic therapy alone was 65.5 and 40.4 months, respectively (HR = 0.48, p = .003); in the subset of patients with extrahepatic metastases, the median OS for those treated with AS and systemic therapy alone was 46.4 and 40.8 months, respectively (HR = 0.58, p = .047). Among patients with >3 cm or >3 lesions, the median OS for those treated with AS or systemic therapy alone was 45.2 and 29 months, respectively (HR = 0.67, p = .084). Conclusions: Among patients with BCLM (≤3 tumors, each ≤3 cm), AS provide longer survival compared to systemic therapy alone, even with extrahepatic metastases. For patients with larger or more numerous metastases (>3 cm or >3 lesions), AS may provide survival benefit, but further validation is needed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977625000050AblationBreast cancer liver metastasesLiver resectionSystemic therapy
spellingShingle Xuxiazi Zou
Hong-Liang Zou
Xuan Luo
Xu-Wei Chen
Wei-Ling Huang
Chao Zhang
Ge Ren
Jin-Hua Huang
Xue Han
Yi-Quan Jiang
Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases status
Breast
Ablation
Breast cancer liver metastases
Liver resection
Systemic therapy
title Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases status
title_full Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases status
title_fullStr Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases status
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases status
title_short Retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases, stratified by extrahepatic metastases status
title_sort retrospective comparative survival analysis of ablation plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for breast cancer liver metastases stratified by extrahepatic metastases status
topic Ablation
Breast cancer liver metastases
Liver resection
Systemic therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977625000050
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxiazizou retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT hongliangzou retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT xuanluo retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT xuweichen retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT weilinghuang retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT chaozhang retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT geren retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT jinhuahuang retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT xuehan retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus
AT yiquanjiang retrospectivecomparativesurvivalanalysisofablationplussystemictherapyversussystemictherapyaloneforbreastcancerlivermetastasesstratifiedbyextrahepaticmetastasesstatus