A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy
<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Bone metastases in patients can cause significant quality-of-life declines due to skeletal-related events (SREs). SRE is defined as the occurrence of radiotherapy for bone pain, pathologic fracture, bone surgery, spinal cord compression, or hypercalcemia...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Medicina |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/2/360 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849718935182639104 |
|---|---|
| author | İrem Öner Hicran Anık Bediz Kurt İnci Pınar Kubilay Tolunay Öztürk Ateş Ülkü Yalçıntaş Arslan Cengiz Karaçin |
| author_facet | İrem Öner Hicran Anık Bediz Kurt İnci Pınar Kubilay Tolunay Öztürk Ateş Ülkü Yalçıntaş Arslan Cengiz Karaçin |
| author_sort | İrem Öner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <i>Background and Objectives</i>: Bone metastases in patients can cause significant quality-of-life declines due to skeletal-related events (SREs). SRE is defined as the occurrence of radiotherapy for bone pain, pathologic fracture, bone surgery, spinal cord compression, or hypercalcemia. Bone-modifying agents (BMAs), such as denosumab and zoledronic acid, are crucial in reducing the frequency and severity of SREs. The inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors has emerged as the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, demonstrating significant improvements in survival outcomes. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of denosumab and zoledronic acid in preventing SRE in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This retrospective study included 328 patients diagnosed with bone metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (palbociclib or ribociclib). Patients were assigned to receive either subcutaneous denosumab or intravenous zoledronic acid every 4 weeks. Time to the first skeletal-related event post bone-modifying agent initiation, SRE incidence, and the safety data were evaluated. The data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests, and Kaplan–Meier methods for time-to-event data. <i>Results</i>: In the denosumab group, the median time to the first skeletal-related event was significantly longer than in the zoledronic acid group (44.55 months and 29.16 months, respectively). Denosumab treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of developing the first SRE after bone-modifying agent initiation compared to zoledronic acid (HR: 0.56, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Additionally, ECOG PS and the number of metastatic bone sites were identified as independent prognostic factors for time to the first SRE. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies reported in the literature. <i>Conclusions</i>: Our study demonstrated that when used with CDK4/6 inhibitors, denosumab is associated with a delay in SREs and a lower SRE incidence than zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases. These findings support the efficacy of denosumab in preventing SREs and suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors may have distinct effects on the bone microenvironment, particularly when combined with denosumab. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-137331ebf21a49d8b43c46c6f6ecdcbc |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1010-660X 1648-9144 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Medicina |
| spelling | doaj-art-137331ebf21a49d8b43c46c6f6ecdcbc2025-08-20T03:12:15ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442025-02-0161236010.3390/medicina61020360A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapyİrem Öner0Hicran Anık1Bediz Kurt İnci2Pınar Kubilay Tolunay3Öztürk Ateş4Ülkü Yalçıntaş Arslan5Cengiz Karaçin6Departmant of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, 06200 Ankara, TurkeyDepartmant of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, 06200 Ankara, TurkeyDepartmant of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, 06200 Ankara, TurkeyDepartmant of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, 06200 Ankara, TurkeyDepartmant of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, 06200 Ankara, TurkeyDepartmant of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, 06200 Ankara, TurkeyDepartmant of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Bone metastases in patients can cause significant quality-of-life declines due to skeletal-related events (SREs). SRE is defined as the occurrence of radiotherapy for bone pain, pathologic fracture, bone surgery, spinal cord compression, or hypercalcemia. Bone-modifying agents (BMAs), such as denosumab and zoledronic acid, are crucial in reducing the frequency and severity of SREs. The inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors has emerged as the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, demonstrating significant improvements in survival outcomes. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of denosumab and zoledronic acid in preventing SRE in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This retrospective study included 328 patients diagnosed with bone metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (palbociclib or ribociclib). Patients were assigned to receive either subcutaneous denosumab or intravenous zoledronic acid every 4 weeks. Time to the first skeletal-related event post bone-modifying agent initiation, SRE incidence, and the safety data were evaluated. The data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests, and Kaplan–Meier methods for time-to-event data. <i>Results</i>: In the denosumab group, the median time to the first skeletal-related event was significantly longer than in the zoledronic acid group (44.55 months and 29.16 months, respectively). Denosumab treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of developing the first SRE after bone-modifying agent initiation compared to zoledronic acid (HR: 0.56, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Additionally, ECOG PS and the number of metastatic bone sites were identified as independent prognostic factors for time to the first SRE. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies reported in the literature. <i>Conclusions</i>: Our study demonstrated that when used with CDK4/6 inhibitors, denosumab is associated with a delay in SREs and a lower SRE incidence than zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases. These findings support the efficacy of denosumab in preventing SREs and suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors may have distinct effects on the bone microenvironment, particularly when combined with denosumab.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/2/360cdk4/6 inhibitorribociclibpalbociclibdenosumabRANKL inhibitorzoledronic acid |
| spellingShingle | İrem Öner Hicran Anık Bediz Kurt İnci Pınar Kubilay Tolunay Öztürk Ateş Ülkü Yalçıntaş Arslan Cengiz Karaçin A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy Medicina cdk4/6 inhibitor ribociclib palbociclib denosumab RANKL inhibitor zoledronic acid |
| title | A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy |
| title_full | A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy |
| title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy |
| title_short | A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy |
| title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastatic breast cancer receiving cdk4 6 inhibitor therapy |
| topic | cdk4/6 inhibitor ribociclib palbociclib denosumab RANKL inhibitor zoledronic acid |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/2/360 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT iremoner acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT hicrananık acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT bedizkurtinci acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT pınarkubilaytolunay acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT ozturkates acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT ulkuyalcıntasarslan acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT cengizkaracin acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT iremoner comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT hicrananık comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT bedizkurtinci comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT pınarkubilaytolunay comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT ozturkates comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT ulkuyalcıntasarslan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy AT cengizkaracin comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdenosumabandzoledronicacidinpatientswithbonemetastaticbreastcancerreceivingcdk46inhibitortherapy |