The (im)possibility of communication
This paper addresses the question of communication from a perspective opened up by Derrida’s reading of Joyce’s Ulysses in terms of the relationship between the notion of the ‘yes’ or iterability, the signature of (and counter-signature to) a text and two types of laughter. It is shown that the sam...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Johannesburg
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Communicare |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1783 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832593752288395264 |
---|---|
author | Bert Olivier |
author_facet | Bert Olivier |
author_sort | Bert Olivier |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
This paper addresses the question of communication from a perspective opened up by
Derrida’s reading of Joyce’s Ulysses in terms of the relationship between the notion of
the ‘yes’ or iterability, the signature of (and counter-signature to) a text and two types
of laughter. It is shown that the same aporia that confronts the reader of Ulysses, namely
that a counter-signature to the text is possible as a novel event and is simultaneously
not possible as such, faces participants in communication: communication is and is not
possible. The work of Hardt and Negri is further used to add another dimension to this
aporia, this time focusing on the paradox of living in a so-called ‘age of communication’,
while certain events of resistance to the agencies of global hegemony are incommunicable.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-136129b93d544bd78002001b55d90964 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0259-0069 2957-7950 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | University of Johannesburg |
record_format | Article |
series | Communicare |
spelling | doaj-art-136129b93d544bd78002001b55d909642025-01-20T08:51:23ZengUniversity of JohannesburgCommunicare0259-00692957-79502022-10-0123110.36615/jcsa.v23i1.1783The (im)possibility of communicationBert Olivier0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3138-1948Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University This paper addresses the question of communication from a perspective opened up by Derrida’s reading of Joyce’s Ulysses in terms of the relationship between the notion of the ‘yes’ or iterability, the signature of (and counter-signature to) a text and two types of laughter. It is shown that the same aporia that confronts the reader of Ulysses, namely that a counter-signature to the text is possible as a novel event and is simultaneously not possible as such, faces participants in communication: communication is and is not possible. The work of Hardt and Negri is further used to add another dimension to this aporia, this time focusing on the paradox of living in a so-called ‘age of communication’, while certain events of resistance to the agencies of global hegemony are incommunicable. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1783communicationJoyce’s UlyssesDerrida’s readingHardt and Negriaporiaglobal hegemony |
spellingShingle | Bert Olivier The (im)possibility of communication Communicare communication Joyce’s Ulysses Derrida’s reading Hardt and Negri aporia global hegemony |
title | The (im)possibility of communication |
title_full | The (im)possibility of communication |
title_fullStr | The (im)possibility of communication |
title_full_unstemmed | The (im)possibility of communication |
title_short | The (im)possibility of communication |
title_sort | im possibility of communication |
topic | communication Joyce’s Ulysses Derrida’s reading Hardt and Negri aporia global hegemony |
url | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bertolivier theimpossibilityofcommunication AT bertolivier impossibilityofcommunication |