The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservation
The introduction of the Community Land Act (2016), heralded by Kenya’s National Land Policy under its 2010 Constitution, reignited debates around the formalisation of customary property rights, leading many Maasai group ranches to dissolve communal land into private, individualised parcels rather th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Pastoralism |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/past.2025.14918/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849427471123873792 |
|---|---|
| author | Gabriella Santini Gabriella Santini |
| author_facet | Gabriella Santini Gabriella Santini |
| author_sort | Gabriella Santini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The introduction of the Community Land Act (2016), heralded by Kenya’s National Land Policy under its 2010 Constitution, reignited debates around the formalisation of customary property rights, leading many Maasai group ranches to dissolve communal land into private, individualised parcels rather than register as community lands. This trend has often resulted in land enclosures and unsustainable resource use, threatening vital community-managed resources such as forests, grasslands, and wildlife. This study employs a qualitative comparative case study of two Maasai group ranches’ transition to private tenure in order to investigate local perceptions of the CLA and the factors motivating communities to move away from communal land holdings. It also examines how the two different approaches to land subdivision affect resource management and conservation outcomes. It draws from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Oloirien (Narok County) and Olgulului/Ololarashi (Kajiado County), including semi-structured interviews, household questionnaires and participant observation, conducted between 2022 and 2023 among Maasai communities, as well as a review of secondary sources. The findings reveal that Olgulului/Ololarashi, which integrated demands for private property rights with communal access and management of the commons, was able to mitigate many unintended consequences of privatisation, such as path dependency and resource fragmentation. In contrast, Oloirien’s approach led to increased land enclosures and weakened collective management. This paper argues that, in an enclosure context, conservation initiatives that allow for the continuity of customary resource management and give people a tangible stake in projects are more likely to foster a collective sense of environmental responsibility and stewardship. These insights have broader relevance for land policy and conservation strategies across African rangelands. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-135b301ebd194d81a68fbf79f850104a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2041-7136 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pastoralism |
| spelling | doaj-art-135b301ebd194d81a68fbf79f850104a2025-08-20T03:29:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Pastoralism2041-71362025-07-011510.3389/past.2025.1491814918The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservationGabriella Santini0Gabriella Santini1Anthropology Department, University College London, London, United KingdomZoological Society of London, London, United KingdomThe introduction of the Community Land Act (2016), heralded by Kenya’s National Land Policy under its 2010 Constitution, reignited debates around the formalisation of customary property rights, leading many Maasai group ranches to dissolve communal land into private, individualised parcels rather than register as community lands. This trend has often resulted in land enclosures and unsustainable resource use, threatening vital community-managed resources such as forests, grasslands, and wildlife. This study employs a qualitative comparative case study of two Maasai group ranches’ transition to private tenure in order to investigate local perceptions of the CLA and the factors motivating communities to move away from communal land holdings. It also examines how the two different approaches to land subdivision affect resource management and conservation outcomes. It draws from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Oloirien (Narok County) and Olgulului/Ololarashi (Kajiado County), including semi-structured interviews, household questionnaires and participant observation, conducted between 2022 and 2023 among Maasai communities, as well as a review of secondary sources. The findings reveal that Olgulului/Ololarashi, which integrated demands for private property rights with communal access and management of the commons, was able to mitigate many unintended consequences of privatisation, such as path dependency and resource fragmentation. In contrast, Oloirien’s approach led to increased land enclosures and weakened collective management. This paper argues that, in an enclosure context, conservation initiatives that allow for the continuity of customary resource management and give people a tangible stake in projects are more likely to foster a collective sense of environmental responsibility and stewardship. These insights have broader relevance for land policy and conservation strategies across African rangelands.https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/past.2025.14918/fullMaasaiKenyaland subdivisionconservationconstitutiongroup ranch |
| spellingShingle | Gabriella Santini Gabriella Santini The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservation Pastoralism Maasai Kenya land subdivision conservation constitution group ranch |
| title | The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservation |
| title_full | The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservation |
| title_fullStr | The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservation |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservation |
| title_short | The Community Land Act and the subdivision of Kenya’s Maasailand’s remaining commons: implications for community conservation |
| title_sort | community land act and the subdivision of kenya s maasailand s remaining commons implications for community conservation |
| topic | Maasai Kenya land subdivision conservation constitution group ranch |
| url | https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/past.2025.14918/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gabriellasantini thecommunitylandactandthesubdivisionofkenyasmaasailandsremainingcommonsimplicationsforcommunityconservation AT gabriellasantini thecommunitylandactandthesubdivisionofkenyasmaasailandsremainingcommonsimplicationsforcommunityconservation AT gabriellasantini communitylandactandthesubdivisionofkenyasmaasailandsremainingcommonsimplicationsforcommunityconservation AT gabriellasantini communitylandactandthesubdivisionofkenyasmaasailandsremainingcommonsimplicationsforcommunityconservation |