Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control

Abstract White‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Michigan, USA, is one of the few species in the world considered a maintenance host for bovine tuberculosis (TB). Prevalence of TB over the past decade has remained steady in Deer Management Unit (DMU) 452 and new control strategies are needed t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melinda K. Cosgrove, Henry Campa III, David S. L. Ramsey, Stephen M. Schmitt, Daniel J. O'brien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-12-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.217
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850256978609176576
author Melinda K. Cosgrove
Henry Campa III
David S. L. Ramsey
Stephen M. Schmitt
Daniel J. O'brien
author_facet Melinda K. Cosgrove
Henry Campa III
David S. L. Ramsey
Stephen M. Schmitt
Daniel J. O'brien
author_sort Melinda K. Cosgrove
collection DOAJ
description Abstract White‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Michigan, USA, is one of the few species in the world considered a maintenance host for bovine tuberculosis (TB). Prevalence of TB over the past decade has remained steady in Deer Management Unit (DMU) 452 and new control strategies are needed to further reduce prevalence or eradicate the disease. There is little public support for large‐scale culling of deer in Michigan, and vaccination is being considered as a potential management tool. Our goal was to evaluate the use of vaccination and/or targeted removal via live‐trapping as TB control measures and how changes in vaccine parameters affect prevalence reduction. We used a spatially explicit stochastic individual‐based model of TB dynamics in white‐tailed deer to evaluate 39 management scenarios for their ability to 1) reach a 95% probability of eradication, and 2) lower TB prevalence over 30 years. We found continuation of current management would not result in a detectable prevalence reduction, nor would treatment of a “hot‐spot” of infection within DMU 452. Application frequency played a larger role in prevalence reduction than vaccine efficacy, guaranteed immunity period, or half‐life. Vaccination (alone or with targeted removal) applied annually throughout DMU 452 was necessary for a detectable reduction in prevalence. Projected costs for application over DMU 452 would exceed US$1.5 million annually. Vaccination will be costly and require long‐term commitment, but the economic losses associated with allowing TB to persist in Michigan could outweigh vaccination costs. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-13575dd36e04495b8c2b63544a42d93d
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-13575dd36e04495b8c2b63544a42d93d2025-08-20T01:56:32ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402012-12-0136467668410.1002/wsb.217Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis controlMelinda K. Cosgrove0Henry Campa III1David S. L. Ramsey2Stephen M. Schmitt3Daniel J. O'brien4Wildlife Disease Laboratory, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 4125 Beaumont Road, Room 250, Lansing, MI 48910‐8106, USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 48824‐1222, USAArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, AustraliaWildlife Disease Laboratory, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 4125 Beaumont Road, Room 250, Lansing, MI 48910‐8106, USAWildlife Disease Laboratory, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 4125 Beaumont Road, Room 250, Lansing, MI 48910‐8106, USAAbstract White‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Michigan, USA, is one of the few species in the world considered a maintenance host for bovine tuberculosis (TB). Prevalence of TB over the past decade has remained steady in Deer Management Unit (DMU) 452 and new control strategies are needed to further reduce prevalence or eradicate the disease. There is little public support for large‐scale culling of deer in Michigan, and vaccination is being considered as a potential management tool. Our goal was to evaluate the use of vaccination and/or targeted removal via live‐trapping as TB control measures and how changes in vaccine parameters affect prevalence reduction. We used a spatially explicit stochastic individual‐based model of TB dynamics in white‐tailed deer to evaluate 39 management scenarios for their ability to 1) reach a 95% probability of eradication, and 2) lower TB prevalence over 30 years. We found continuation of current management would not result in a detectable prevalence reduction, nor would treatment of a “hot‐spot” of infection within DMU 452. Application frequency played a larger role in prevalence reduction than vaccine efficacy, guaranteed immunity period, or half‐life. Vaccination (alone or with targeted removal) applied annually throughout DMU 452 was necessary for a detectable reduction in prevalence. Projected costs for application over DMU 452 would exceed US$1.5 million annually. Vaccination will be costly and require long‐term commitment, but the economic losses associated with allowing TB to persist in Michigan could outweigh vaccination costs. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.217Bacillus Calmette–Guerin vaccineBCGbovine tuberculosisMycobacterium bovisOdocoileus virginianusTB
spellingShingle Melinda K. Cosgrove
Henry Campa III
David S. L. Ramsey
Stephen M. Schmitt
Daniel J. O'brien
Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Bacillus Calmette–Guerin vaccine
BCG
bovine tuberculosis
Mycobacterium bovis
Odocoileus virginianus
TB
title Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control
title_full Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control
title_fullStr Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control
title_full_unstemmed Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control
title_short Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white‐tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control
title_sort modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white tailed deer in michigan for bovine tuberculosis control
topic Bacillus Calmette–Guerin vaccine
BCG
bovine tuberculosis
Mycobacterium bovis
Odocoileus virginianus
TB
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.217
work_keys_str_mv AT melindakcosgrove modelingvaccinationandtargetedremovalofwhitetaileddeerinmichiganforbovinetuberculosiscontrol
AT henrycampaiii modelingvaccinationandtargetedremovalofwhitetaileddeerinmichiganforbovinetuberculosiscontrol
AT davidslramsey modelingvaccinationandtargetedremovalofwhitetaileddeerinmichiganforbovinetuberculosiscontrol
AT stephenmschmitt modelingvaccinationandtargetedremovalofwhitetaileddeerinmichiganforbovinetuberculosiscontrol
AT danieljobrien modelingvaccinationandtargetedremovalofwhitetaileddeerinmichiganforbovinetuberculosiscontrol