Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and Suspension

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of cimetidine 200 mg tablet with that of cimetidine suspension (200 mg/10 mL), a 20 mL suspension of 800 mg magnesium hydroxide and 912 mg aluminum hydroxide, and matching placebo on intragastric pH of healthy volunteers. There were 13 males and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ABR Thomson, P Kirdeikis, L Zuk, RE Samuels, P Zarevics
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1994-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1994/236275
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558083593732096
author ABR Thomson
P Kirdeikis
L Zuk
RE Samuels
P Zarevics
author_facet ABR Thomson
P Kirdeikis
L Zuk
RE Samuels
P Zarevics
author_sort ABR Thomson
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study was to compare the effect of cimetidine 200 mg tablet with that of cimetidine suspension (200 mg/10 mL), a 20 mL suspension of 800 mg magnesium hydroxide and 912 mg aluminum hydroxide, and matching placebo on intragastric pH of healthy volunteers. There were 13 males and seven females, mean age 23 years (range 20 to 32) and mean weight 72 kg (range 55 to 89). The intragastric pH of each subject was measured over 6 h starting immediately before dosing on each of five study days. Cimetidine plasma levels were measured for 6 h after dosing on each of the cimetidine study days. Cimetidine tablet and suspension were superior to placebo tablet or suspension or to the magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide suspension in the area under the pH time curve from 0 to 6 h, percentage time pH of at least 3.5, change from pretreatment pH area under the pH time curve (0 to 6 h) and maximum increase in pH. Mean plasma cimetidine levels were significantly and positively correlated to mean intragastric pH for both cimetidine tablets and cimetidine suspension. Comparing cimetidine concentration (Cmax) and lower percentage time plasma cimetidine concentration was at least 0.5 μg/mL (the minimum therapeutic level). These pharmacokinetic variations between cimetidine suspension and tablets may have partially explained the pharmacodynamic differences of the lower area under the pH time curve (0 to 6 h). The results indicate that both cimetidine tablets and cimetidine suspension significantly increase intragastric pH relative to the magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide suspension, placebo tablets or placebo suspension. Based on the assumption that elevation of intragastric pH is an important factor for alleviation of the symptoms and for the healing of peptic disorders, the results of this study suggest that both cimetidine tablets and cimetidine suspension should be effective treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-131c7ee91e21431185117df3926ed6ad
institution Kabale University
issn 0835-7900
language English
publishDate 1994-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
spelling doaj-art-131c7ee91e21431185117df3926ed6ad2025-02-03T01:33:15ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79001994-01-018529730210.1155/1994/236275Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and SuspensionABR Thomson0P Kirdeikis1L Zuk2RE Samuels3P Zarevics4Nutrition and Metabolism Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaNutrition and Metabolism Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaTherapeutic Unit, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Fort Falls Corporate Center, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USATherapeutic Unit, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Fort Falls Corporate Center, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USATherapeutic Unit, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Fort Falls Corporate Center, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USAThe objective of this study was to compare the effect of cimetidine 200 mg tablet with that of cimetidine suspension (200 mg/10 mL), a 20 mL suspension of 800 mg magnesium hydroxide and 912 mg aluminum hydroxide, and matching placebo on intragastric pH of healthy volunteers. There were 13 males and seven females, mean age 23 years (range 20 to 32) and mean weight 72 kg (range 55 to 89). The intragastric pH of each subject was measured over 6 h starting immediately before dosing on each of five study days. Cimetidine plasma levels were measured for 6 h after dosing on each of the cimetidine study days. Cimetidine tablet and suspension were superior to placebo tablet or suspension or to the magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide suspension in the area under the pH time curve from 0 to 6 h, percentage time pH of at least 3.5, change from pretreatment pH area under the pH time curve (0 to 6 h) and maximum increase in pH. Mean plasma cimetidine levels were significantly and positively correlated to mean intragastric pH for both cimetidine tablets and cimetidine suspension. Comparing cimetidine concentration (Cmax) and lower percentage time plasma cimetidine concentration was at least 0.5 μg/mL (the minimum therapeutic level). These pharmacokinetic variations between cimetidine suspension and tablets may have partially explained the pharmacodynamic differences of the lower area under the pH time curve (0 to 6 h). The results indicate that both cimetidine tablets and cimetidine suspension significantly increase intragastric pH relative to the magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide suspension, placebo tablets or placebo suspension. Based on the assumption that elevation of intragastric pH is an important factor for alleviation of the symptoms and for the healing of peptic disorders, the results of this study suggest that both cimetidine tablets and cimetidine suspension should be effective treatment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1994/236275
spellingShingle ABR Thomson
P Kirdeikis
L Zuk
RE Samuels
P Zarevics
Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and Suspension
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
title Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and Suspension
title_full Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and Suspension
title_fullStr Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and Suspension
title_full_unstemmed Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and Suspension
title_short Cimetidine Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of Tablets and Suspension
title_sort cimetidine pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects a comparison of tablets and suspension
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1994/236275
work_keys_str_mv AT abrthomson cimetidinepharmacodynamicsandpharmacokineticsinhealthysubjectsacomparisonoftabletsandsuspension
AT pkirdeikis cimetidinepharmacodynamicsandpharmacokineticsinhealthysubjectsacomparisonoftabletsandsuspension
AT lzuk cimetidinepharmacodynamicsandpharmacokineticsinhealthysubjectsacomparisonoftabletsandsuspension
AT resamuels cimetidinepharmacodynamicsandpharmacokineticsinhealthysubjectsacomparisonoftabletsandsuspension
AT pzarevics cimetidinepharmacodynamicsandpharmacokineticsinhealthysubjectsacomparisonoftabletsandsuspension