Reintroduced White Storks (Ciconia ciconia) Have Similar Diets to Their Wild Conspecifics

ABSTRACT Understanding a species' diet is crucial for assessing its ecology and can indicate the success of reintroduction efforts. We explored dietary composition and compared pellet morphology and supplementary prey proportions between two white stork (Ciconia ciconia) groups to assess reintr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Şeniz Mustafa, Connor T. Panter, Laura Vaughan‐Hirsch, Rachel L. White, Anja Rott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71278
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Understanding a species' diet is crucial for assessing its ecology and can indicate the success of reintroduction efforts. We explored dietary composition and compared pellet morphology and supplementary prey proportions between two white stork (Ciconia ciconia) groups to assess reintroduction effectiveness. White stork groups consisted of released individuals that were free flying (i.e., “wild group”) and those kept within a confined enclosure (“captive group”). A total of 23 white stork pellets were collected during the 2023 breeding season. Wild group pellets were significantly heavier (x̄ = 12.7 ± 9.2 g [SD]) than captive group pellets (x̄ = 5.2 ± 2.1 g). As expected, all captive group pellets contained supplementary prey, accounting for 88.4% ± 26.1% of pellet biomass, whereas 73.3% of wild group pellets contained supplementary prey, comprising 52.9% ± 36.3% of pellet biomass. The wild group predominantly foraged on beetles (Coleoptera) and earthworms (Clitellata). Our results represent the first quantitative dietary assessment of reintroduced white storks in southern England. Similarities between our data and that of wild white stork diets from elsewhere in their range suggest successful post‐release acclimatisation at Knepp Estate.
ISSN:2045-7758