Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktail

Abstract While total RNA concentrations putatively represent ribosome content, there is a need to homologize various quantification approaches. Thus, total RNA concentrations ([RNA]) provided through UV–Vis spectroscopy (UV), fluorometry‐only (Fluor), and fluorometry‐based microfluidic chip electrop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua S. Godwin, J. Max Michel, C. Brooks Mobley, Gustavo A. Nader, Michael D. Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Physiological Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70173
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527556894883840
author Joshua S. Godwin
J. Max Michel
C. Brooks Mobley
Gustavo A. Nader
Michael D. Roberts
author_facet Joshua S. Godwin
J. Max Michel
C. Brooks Mobley
Gustavo A. Nader
Michael D. Roberts
author_sort Joshua S. Godwin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract While total RNA concentrations putatively represent ribosome content, there is a need to homologize various quantification approaches. Thus, total RNA concentrations ([RNA]) provided through UV–Vis spectroscopy (UV), fluorometry‐only (Fluor), and fluorometry‐based microfluidic chip electrophoresis (MFGE) were examined in C2C12 myotubes and mouse skeletal muscle to determine if values aligned with [18S + 28S rRNA] (i.e., criterion ribosome metric). A novel antibody cocktail (termed RiboAb) was also tested and compared to [18S + 28S rRNA] in these models. In myotubes, 24‐h IGF‐1 treatments increased [18S + 28S rRNA] (~2.0‐fold) and [RNA] based on UV (~1.9‐fold), Fluor (~2.3 fold), and MFGE (~2.1‐fold). In C57BL/6 mice, 10 days of mechanical overload (MOV) elevated plantaris [18S + 28S rRNA] (~1.7‐fold) and [RNA] according to UV (~1.5‐fold), Fluor (~1.6‐fold), and MFGE (~1.8‐fold). Myotube and mouse plantaris RiboAb levels were significantly higher with IGF‐1 treatments and MOV, respectively, versus controls (1.3‐fold and 1.7‐fold, respectively), and values correlated with [18S + 28S rRNA] (r = 0.637 and r = 0.853, respectively, p ≤ 0.005). UV, Fluor, and MFGE [RNA] are seemingly valid surrogates of cell/tissue ribosome content, although each method has advantages (e.g., ease of use) and disadvantages (e.g., magnitudes of bias) discussed herein. Finally, the RiboAb cocktail may also represent ribosome content, although this should be further explored in other models.
format Article
id doaj-art-12fb2df2773545e3ad31f2104657f8a3
institution Kabale University
issn 2051-817X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Physiological Reports
spelling doaj-art-12fb2df2773545e3ad31f2104657f8a32025-01-15T13:36:31ZengWileyPhysiological Reports2051-817X2025-01-01131n/an/a10.14814/phy2.70173Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktailJoshua S. Godwin0J. Max Michel1C. Brooks Mobley2Gustavo A. Nader3Michael D. Roberts4School of Kinesiology Auburn University Auburn Alabama USASchool of Kinesiology Auburn University Auburn Alabama USASchool of Kinesiology Auburn University Auburn Alabama USADepartment of Kinesiology and Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USASchool of Kinesiology Auburn University Auburn Alabama USAAbstract While total RNA concentrations putatively represent ribosome content, there is a need to homologize various quantification approaches. Thus, total RNA concentrations ([RNA]) provided through UV–Vis spectroscopy (UV), fluorometry‐only (Fluor), and fluorometry‐based microfluidic chip electrophoresis (MFGE) were examined in C2C12 myotubes and mouse skeletal muscle to determine if values aligned with [18S + 28S rRNA] (i.e., criterion ribosome metric). A novel antibody cocktail (termed RiboAb) was also tested and compared to [18S + 28S rRNA] in these models. In myotubes, 24‐h IGF‐1 treatments increased [18S + 28S rRNA] (~2.0‐fold) and [RNA] based on UV (~1.9‐fold), Fluor (~2.3 fold), and MFGE (~2.1‐fold). In C57BL/6 mice, 10 days of mechanical overload (MOV) elevated plantaris [18S + 28S rRNA] (~1.7‐fold) and [RNA] according to UV (~1.5‐fold), Fluor (~1.6‐fold), and MFGE (~1.8‐fold). Myotube and mouse plantaris RiboAb levels were significantly higher with IGF‐1 treatments and MOV, respectively, versus controls (1.3‐fold and 1.7‐fold, respectively), and values correlated with [18S + 28S rRNA] (r = 0.637 and r = 0.853, respectively, p ≤ 0.005). UV, Fluor, and MFGE [RNA] are seemingly valid surrogates of cell/tissue ribosome content, although each method has advantages (e.g., ease of use) and disadvantages (e.g., magnitudes of bias) discussed herein. Finally, the RiboAb cocktail may also represent ribosome content, although this should be further explored in other models.https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70173electrophoresisfluorometryRiboAbribosome pelletingtotal RNAUV–Vis
spellingShingle Joshua S. Godwin
J. Max Michel
C. Brooks Mobley
Gustavo A. Nader
Michael D. Roberts
Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktail
Physiological Reports
electrophoresis
fluorometry
RiboAb
ribosome pelleting
total RNA
UV–Vis
title Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktail
title_full Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktail
title_fullStr Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktail
title_full_unstemmed Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktail
title_short Skeletal muscle ribosome analysis: A comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel RiboAb antibody cocktail
title_sort skeletal muscle ribosome analysis a comparison of common assay methods and utilization of a novel riboab antibody cocktail
topic electrophoresis
fluorometry
RiboAb
ribosome pelleting
total RNA
UV–Vis
url https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70173
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuasgodwin skeletalmuscleribosomeanalysisacomparisonofcommonassaymethodsandutilizationofanovelriboabantibodycocktail
AT jmaxmichel skeletalmuscleribosomeanalysisacomparisonofcommonassaymethodsandutilizationofanovelriboabantibodycocktail
AT cbrooksmobley skeletalmuscleribosomeanalysisacomparisonofcommonassaymethodsandutilizationofanovelriboabantibodycocktail
AT gustavoanader skeletalmuscleribosomeanalysisacomparisonofcommonassaymethodsandutilizationofanovelriboabantibodycocktail
AT michaeldroberts skeletalmuscleribosomeanalysisacomparisonofcommonassaymethodsandutilizationofanovelriboabantibodycocktail