Comment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’

The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) filling and operation is a highly sensitive issue for Egypt and Sudan. A recently accepted manuscript by Heggy et al (2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 074022) assessed the water deficit for Egypt based on different scenarios for the first filling of GERD lake an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Eladawy, Tirusew Asefa, Saker El Nour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7cfa
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849391604199063552
author Ahmed Eladawy
Tirusew Asefa
Saker El Nour
author_facet Ahmed Eladawy
Tirusew Asefa
Saker El Nour
author_sort Ahmed Eladawy
collection DOAJ
description The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) filling and operation is a highly sensitive issue for Egypt and Sudan. A recently accepted manuscript by Heggy et al (2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 074022) assessed the water deficit for Egypt based on different scenarios for the first filling of GERD lake and estimated 31 billion cubic meters per year under a 3 year filling scenario. We would like to present grossly mischaracterized assumptions, inaccurate data, and controversial conclusions found in this accepted manuscript through this rebuttal. Although the accepted manuscript does not include any new analysis of the River Nile Hydrology, the results of previous substantive studies were misinterpreted or ignored. Moreover, we have serious concerns about the basic hydrological assumptions that are the basis for the economic impacts and the potential loss of the Egyptian agricultural lands. The main methodological flaws of concerns are (a) how the deficit is calculated, losses from GERD, especially the evaporation losses that contradicts several previous studies (e.g. Wheeler et al 2016 Water Int. 41 611–34; Eldardiry and Hossain 2020 J. Hydrol. 125708; Wheeler et al 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 1–9); (b) neglecting the normal role of High Aswan Dam (HAD) reservoir and directly linking the deficit of the water budget to an immediate loss of agricultural lands with all other associated exaggerated economic impacts estimates; (c) including highly exaggerated seepage losses from the GERD lake; (d) neglecting the updated situation of Aswan High Dam reservoir levels and the GERD’s infrastructure itself, and (e) quantifying the impacts of potential changes of water level on HAD reservoir on the Nubian aquifer. We herein present a direct fact-checking approach including the studies cited in the accepted manuscript. We believe that this critical comment paper can serve as a basis for defending scientific integrity and contributes to cooperation and peace in the region.
format Article
id doaj-art-12efa0ada49240aa884ee443bdb771fb
institution Kabale University
issn 1748-9326
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-12efa0ada49240aa884ee443bdb771fb2025-08-20T03:41:00ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262022-01-0117808800110.1088/1748-9326/ac7cfaComment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’Ahmed Eladawy0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-7714Tirusew Asefa1Saker El Nour2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-6272Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology , Ookayama 2-12-1 W8-5, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan; Irrigation and Hydraulics Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Mansoura University , Egypt, 60 Elgomhoria Street, Mansoura 35516, EgyptSystem Decision Support, Tampa Bay Water , Clearwater, FL 33763, United States of America; Tampa Bay Water, Clearwater, FL 33763; Courtesy Professor , Tampa, FL, 33620, United States of AmericaCenter for Middle Eastern and North African Politics, Otto-Suhr-Institute for Political Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin , Ihnestr. 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany; International Research Group on Authoritarianism and Counter-Strategies, Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung , Straße der Pariser Kommune 8A, 10243 Berlin, GermanyThe Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) filling and operation is a highly sensitive issue for Egypt and Sudan. A recently accepted manuscript by Heggy et al (2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 074022) assessed the water deficit for Egypt based on different scenarios for the first filling of GERD lake and estimated 31 billion cubic meters per year under a 3 year filling scenario. We would like to present grossly mischaracterized assumptions, inaccurate data, and controversial conclusions found in this accepted manuscript through this rebuttal. Although the accepted manuscript does not include any new analysis of the River Nile Hydrology, the results of previous substantive studies were misinterpreted or ignored. Moreover, we have serious concerns about the basic hydrological assumptions that are the basis for the economic impacts and the potential loss of the Egyptian agricultural lands. The main methodological flaws of concerns are (a) how the deficit is calculated, losses from GERD, especially the evaporation losses that contradicts several previous studies (e.g. Wheeler et al 2016 Water Int. 41 611–34; Eldardiry and Hossain 2020 J. Hydrol. 125708; Wheeler et al 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 1–9); (b) neglecting the normal role of High Aswan Dam (HAD) reservoir and directly linking the deficit of the water budget to an immediate loss of agricultural lands with all other associated exaggerated economic impacts estimates; (c) including highly exaggerated seepage losses from the GERD lake; (d) neglecting the updated situation of Aswan High Dam reservoir levels and the GERD’s infrastructure itself, and (e) quantifying the impacts of potential changes of water level on HAD reservoir on the Nubian aquifer. We herein present a direct fact-checking approach including the studies cited in the accepted manuscript. We believe that this critical comment paper can serve as a basis for defending scientific integrity and contributes to cooperation and peace in the region.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7cfaGERDNile basinEgyptEthiopialarge reservoirsHigh Aswan Dam
spellingShingle Ahmed Eladawy
Tirusew Asefa
Saker El Nour
Comment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’
Environmental Research Letters
GERD
Nile basin
Egypt
Ethiopia
large reservoirs
High Aswan Dam
title Comment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’
title_full Comment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’
title_fullStr Comment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’
title_full_unstemmed Comment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’
title_short Comment on ‘Egypt’s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam filling scenarios’
title_sort comment on egypt s water budget deficit and suggested mitigation policies for the grand ethiopian renaissance dam filling scenarios
topic GERD
Nile basin
Egypt
Ethiopia
large reservoirs
High Aswan Dam
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7cfa
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedeladawy commentonegyptswaterbudgetdeficitandsuggestedmitigationpoliciesforthegrandethiopianrenaissancedamfillingscenarios
AT tirusewasefa commentonegyptswaterbudgetdeficitandsuggestedmitigationpoliciesforthegrandethiopianrenaissancedamfillingscenarios
AT sakerelnour commentonegyptswaterbudgetdeficitandsuggestedmitigationpoliciesforthegrandethiopianrenaissancedamfillingscenarios