Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use
Abstract Species detections often vary depending on the survey methods employed. Some species may go undetected when using only one approach in community‐level inventory and monitoring programs, which has management and conservation implications. We conducted a comparative study of terrestrial mamma...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Sasha J. Tetzlaff, Aron D. Katz, Patrick J. Wolff, Matthew E. Kleitch |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-07-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70022 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
CAM-COAST: the database of bird and mammal fauna collected through camera traps in a Natura 2000 coastal site in Italy
by: Maria Carla de Francesco, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
Combining eDNA Metabarcoding, Hydrology‐Based Modeling and Camera Trap Datasets to Assess the Potential of River eDNA in Monitoring Terrestrial Mammals
by: Monika Goralczyk, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Watershed: a more efficient sampling unit for mountain camera traps
by: Jun-Jie Li, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Camera Traps Document Infant Corpse Carrying Behaviour in Multiple Unhabituated Chimpanzee Populations
by: Elena Bersacola, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Human interference with wildlife surveys: a case study from camera-trapping road underpasses in Costa Rica
by: Eleanor Flatt, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)