Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.

<h4>Background</h4>The conventional measurement of obesity utilises the body mass index (BMI) criterion. Although there are benefits to this method, there is concern that not all individuals at risk of obesity-associated medical conditions are being identified. Whole-body fat percentage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle G Swainson, Alan M Batterham, Costas Tsakirides, Zoe H Rutherford, Karen Hind
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177175&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849467418341015552
author Michelle G Swainson
Alan M Batterham
Costas Tsakirides
Zoe H Rutherford
Karen Hind
author_facet Michelle G Swainson
Alan M Batterham
Costas Tsakirides
Zoe H Rutherford
Karen Hind
author_sort Michelle G Swainson
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The conventional measurement of obesity utilises the body mass index (BMI) criterion. Although there are benefits to this method, there is concern that not all individuals at risk of obesity-associated medical conditions are being identified. Whole-body fat percentage (%FM), and specifically visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass, are correlated with and potentially implicated in disease trajectories, but are not fully accounted for through BMI evaluation. The aims of this study were (a) to compare five anthropometric predictors of %FM and VAT mass, and (b) to explore new cut-points for the best of these predictors to improve the characterisation of obesity.<h4>Methods</h4>BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist/height0.5 (WHT.5R) were measured and calculated for 81 adults (40 women, 41 men; mean (SD) age: 38.4 (17.5) years; 94% Caucasian). Total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry with Corescan (GE Lunar iDXA, Encore version 15.0) was also performed to quantify %FM and VAT mass. Linear regression analysis, stratified by sex, was applied to predict both %FM and VAT mass for each anthropometric variable. Within each sex, we used information theoretic methods (Akaike Information Criterion; AIC) to compare models. For the best anthropometric predictor, we derived tentative cut-points for classifying individuals as obese (>25% FM for men or >35% FM for women, or > highest tertile for VAT mass).<h4>Results</h4>The best predictor of both %FM and VAT mass in men and women was WHtR. Derived cut-points for predicting whole body obesity were 0.53 in men and 0.54 in women. The cut-point for predicting visceral obesity was 0.59 in both sexes.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In the absence of more objective measures of central obesity and adiposity, WHtR is a suitable proxy measure in both women and men. The proposed DXA-%FM and VAT mass cut-offs require validation in larger studies, but offer potential for improvement of obesity characterisation and the identification of individuals who would most benefit from therapeutic intervention.
format Article
id doaj-art-12d98e7763a44ae6ba2f49896e2d5ce0
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-12d98e7763a44ae6ba2f49896e2d5ce02025-08-20T03:26:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01125e017717510.1371/journal.pone.0177175Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.Michelle G SwainsonAlan M BatterhamCostas TsakiridesZoe H RutherfordKaren Hind<h4>Background</h4>The conventional measurement of obesity utilises the body mass index (BMI) criterion. Although there are benefits to this method, there is concern that not all individuals at risk of obesity-associated medical conditions are being identified. Whole-body fat percentage (%FM), and specifically visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass, are correlated with and potentially implicated in disease trajectories, but are not fully accounted for through BMI evaluation. The aims of this study were (a) to compare five anthropometric predictors of %FM and VAT mass, and (b) to explore new cut-points for the best of these predictors to improve the characterisation of obesity.<h4>Methods</h4>BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist/height0.5 (WHT.5R) were measured and calculated for 81 adults (40 women, 41 men; mean (SD) age: 38.4 (17.5) years; 94% Caucasian). Total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry with Corescan (GE Lunar iDXA, Encore version 15.0) was also performed to quantify %FM and VAT mass. Linear regression analysis, stratified by sex, was applied to predict both %FM and VAT mass for each anthropometric variable. Within each sex, we used information theoretic methods (Akaike Information Criterion; AIC) to compare models. For the best anthropometric predictor, we derived tentative cut-points for classifying individuals as obese (>25% FM for men or >35% FM for women, or > highest tertile for VAT mass).<h4>Results</h4>The best predictor of both %FM and VAT mass in men and women was WHtR. Derived cut-points for predicting whole body obesity were 0.53 in men and 0.54 in women. The cut-point for predicting visceral obesity was 0.59 in both sexes.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In the absence of more objective measures of central obesity and adiposity, WHtR is a suitable proxy measure in both women and men. The proposed DXA-%FM and VAT mass cut-offs require validation in larger studies, but offer potential for improvement of obesity characterisation and the identification of individuals who would most benefit from therapeutic intervention.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177175&type=printable
spellingShingle Michelle G Swainson
Alan M Batterham
Costas Tsakirides
Zoe H Rutherford
Karen Hind
Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.
PLoS ONE
title Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.
title_full Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.
title_fullStr Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.
title_short Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables.
title_sort prediction of whole body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177175&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT michellegswainson predictionofwholebodyfatpercentageandvisceraladiposetissuemassfromfiveanthropometricvariables
AT alanmbatterham predictionofwholebodyfatpercentageandvisceraladiposetissuemassfromfiveanthropometricvariables
AT costastsakirides predictionofwholebodyfatpercentageandvisceraladiposetissuemassfromfiveanthropometricvariables
AT zoehrutherford predictionofwholebodyfatpercentageandvisceraladiposetissuemassfromfiveanthropometricvariables
AT karenhind predictionofwholebodyfatpercentageandvisceraladiposetissuemassfromfiveanthropometricvariables