Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright

For a long time Wright’s architecture has been theorized in terms of space. Although space was certainly a key-word in Wright’s discourse, we can neither see it as an objective, three-dimensional space, nor as a more subjective, intimate space. In Wright’s architecture, the third dimension implies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frans Sturkenboom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Delft University of Technology 2023-09-01
Series:A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aplusbe.eu/index.php/p/article/view/313
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849221850837549056
author Frans Sturkenboom
author_facet Frans Sturkenboom
author_sort Frans Sturkenboom
collection DOAJ
description For a long time Wright’s architecture has been theorized in terms of space. Although space was certainly a key-word in Wright’s discourse, we can neither see it as an objective, three-dimensional space, nor as a more subjective, intimate space. In Wright’s architecture, the third dimension implies time, an axis mundi, a story about the earth as being built. Architecture faces the task to explicate this geological dimension. Geology here not only pertains to the crust of the earth and its materials. It also refers to flora and fauna, all the life having co-built the earth. Designing means the digging up of this natural history of a place that should come to resonate in structure, texture, type, pattern, colour and form. Architecture finds its reason in this geological time, it memorizes that time. Every Wright House is a monument of the American landscape. A new space appears: no longer Cartesian threedimensional space, not human-centred place-space, but the shallow space of the building as a bas-relief of the earth, “growing out of the ground into the light.” Wright saw it as a personal assignment to free American architecture from European Eclecticism in order to finally come to “a truly American architecture.” He sought inspiration in the landscape, the earth as being built and as still building itself. Wright’s oeuvre might be read as a journey of discovery of the American landscape. The light, horizontal parts of his buildings refer to an ‘on the way,’ they remind us of vehicles and tents. The stone parts refer to a local earth. The ‘fleet’ of his buildings move over the earth to sample it. In its images we find the archetype of a scientific expedition comparable with the great geographic expeditions of the 19th century. The expedition discovers the styles of American nature as the possible ingredients of a “natural architecture.” The geographic expedition mirrors the adventures of the wanderer and the settler, according to Wright the two characters united in the American soul. It mirrors the adventure of a people of colonists trying to get situated on a terra incognita, trying to root in the American earth while dressing up in American nature. If nature must become the soul of architecture, geometry is the powerful instrument to analyze nature. It is a an instrument teaching us the intellect of creative nature. Wright used a polyphony of geometric styles, from basic geometric forms to protofractals, inventing a style reconciling form with formation. If “an organic building should grow out of the ground into the light, holding that ground as a basic part of itself,” the intelligence of the ground—of nature building the earth—reflects itself in the geometrical patterns of architecture.
format Article
id doaj-art-12a238da4f8f4ed2aab61305366202f4
institution Kabale University
issn 2212-3202
2214-7233
language English
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Delft University of Technology
record_format Article
series A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
spelling doaj-art-12a238da4f8f4ed2aab61305366202f42025-08-26T11:31:19ZengDelft University of TechnologyA+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment2212-32022214-72332023-09-011313Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd WrightFrans Sturkenboom0Delft University of Technology For a long time Wright’s architecture has been theorized in terms of space. Although space was certainly a key-word in Wright’s discourse, we can neither see it as an objective, three-dimensional space, nor as a more subjective, intimate space. In Wright’s architecture, the third dimension implies time, an axis mundi, a story about the earth as being built. Architecture faces the task to explicate this geological dimension. Geology here not only pertains to the crust of the earth and its materials. It also refers to flora and fauna, all the life having co-built the earth. Designing means the digging up of this natural history of a place that should come to resonate in structure, texture, type, pattern, colour and form. Architecture finds its reason in this geological time, it memorizes that time. Every Wright House is a monument of the American landscape. A new space appears: no longer Cartesian threedimensional space, not human-centred place-space, but the shallow space of the building as a bas-relief of the earth, “growing out of the ground into the light.” Wright saw it as a personal assignment to free American architecture from European Eclecticism in order to finally come to “a truly American architecture.” He sought inspiration in the landscape, the earth as being built and as still building itself. Wright’s oeuvre might be read as a journey of discovery of the American landscape. The light, horizontal parts of his buildings refer to an ‘on the way,’ they remind us of vehicles and tents. The stone parts refer to a local earth. The ‘fleet’ of his buildings move over the earth to sample it. In its images we find the archetype of a scientific expedition comparable with the great geographic expeditions of the 19th century. The expedition discovers the styles of American nature as the possible ingredients of a “natural architecture.” The geographic expedition mirrors the adventures of the wanderer and the settler, according to Wright the two characters united in the American soul. It mirrors the adventure of a people of colonists trying to get situated on a terra incognita, trying to root in the American earth while dressing up in American nature. If nature must become the soul of architecture, geometry is the powerful instrument to analyze nature. It is a an instrument teaching us the intellect of creative nature. Wright used a polyphony of geometric styles, from basic geometric forms to protofractals, inventing a style reconciling form with formation. If “an organic building should grow out of the ground into the light, holding that ground as a basic part of itself,” the intelligence of the ground—of nature building the earth—reflects itself in the geometrical patterns of architecture. https://aplusbe.eu/index.php/p/article/view/313Frank Lloyd Wrighttimegeologygeographygeometryarchitecture
spellingShingle Frans Sturkenboom
Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright
A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
Frank Lloyd Wright
time
geology
geography
geometry
architecture
title Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright
title_full Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright
title_fullStr Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright
title_full_unstemmed Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright
title_short Time in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright
title_sort time in the work of frank lloyd wright
topic Frank Lloyd Wright
time
geology
geography
geometry
architecture
url https://aplusbe.eu/index.php/p/article/view/313
work_keys_str_mv AT franssturkenboom timeintheworkoffranklloydwright