La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne?
The differentiation has always accompanied the process of integration and it became more evident with the succession of enlargements. This concept originated in the practice of a tighter co-operation between some Member States in certain areas, or in the exceptional derogations given to other Member...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Institute of Romania
2009-03-01
|
| Series: | Romanian Journal of European Affairs |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA_Vol_9_No1_LA_DIFFERENCIATION.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849429196606013440 |
|---|---|
| author | Bogdana Petrică |
| author_facet | Bogdana Petrică |
| author_sort | Bogdana Petrică |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The differentiation has always accompanied the process of integration and it became more evident with the succession of enlargements. This concept originated in the practice of a tighter co-operation between some Member States in certain areas, or in the exceptional derogations given to other Member States which refused participation. Not only these exceptions may become the rule in an enlarged Union, but they appear as being the only solution, sometimes sensitive, and thus spring the need to be well organized. Beginning with the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice the differentiation is legally enshrined, but it is the works of the Convention for the Drafting of the Constitutional Treaty that advanced the debate on this subject. Finally, the Lisbon Treaty kept most of the provisions of the Constitutional Treaty regarding this subject and for its ratification; it is precisely the concept of differentiation that we shall employ. The Irish “No” demonstrated once more the inevitable obstructions of the unanimity rule, and differentiation might be a solution, while still respecting the diversity of Member States. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-11f33775ea2b475eb641569add0bd1fd |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1582-8271 1841-4273 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2009-03-01 |
| publisher | European Institute of Romania |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Romanian Journal of European Affairs |
| spelling | doaj-art-11f33775ea2b475eb641569add0bd1fd2025-08-20T03:28:26ZengEuropean Institute of RomaniaRomanian Journal of European Affairs1582-82711841-42732009-03-019196107La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne?Bogdana Petrică0Lecturer in European studies and international relations at the University of BucharestThe differentiation has always accompanied the process of integration and it became more evident with the succession of enlargements. This concept originated in the practice of a tighter co-operation between some Member States in certain areas, or in the exceptional derogations given to other Member States which refused participation. Not only these exceptions may become the rule in an enlarged Union, but they appear as being the only solution, sometimes sensitive, and thus spring the need to be well organized. Beginning with the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice the differentiation is legally enshrined, but it is the works of the Convention for the Drafting of the Constitutional Treaty that advanced the debate on this subject. Finally, the Lisbon Treaty kept most of the provisions of the Constitutional Treaty regarding this subject and for its ratification; it is precisely the concept of differentiation that we shall employ. The Irish “No” demonstrated once more the inevitable obstructions of the unanimity rule, and differentiation might be a solution, while still respecting the diversity of Member States.https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA_Vol_9_No1_LA_DIFFERENCIATION.pdfcfspdifferentiationenhanced cooperationesdpstructured cooperationtreaty of lisbon |
| spellingShingle | Bogdana Petrică La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne? Romanian Journal of European Affairs cfsp differentiation enhanced cooperation esdp structured cooperation treaty of lisbon |
| title | La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne? |
| title_full | La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne? |
| title_fullStr | La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne? |
| title_full_unstemmed | La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne? |
| title_short | La differenciation – « solution miracle » pour l’avenir de l’Union Europeenne? |
| title_sort | la differenciation solution miracle pour l avenir de l union europeenne |
| topic | cfsp differentiation enhanced cooperation esdp structured cooperation treaty of lisbon |
| url | https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA_Vol_9_No1_LA_DIFFERENCIATION.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bogdanapetrica ladifferenciationsolutionmiraclepourlavenirdelunioneuropeenne |