Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution

Abstract Tracking data and spatial surveys (e.g., counts) contribute to understanding animal distribution despite highlighting complementary aspects of habitat selection, from detailed insights on few individuals to raw inferences for the population, respectively. Here, we showcased how to combine i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valentin Lauret, Nicolas Courbin, Olivier Scher, Aurélien Besnard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70283
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849326187791253504
author Valentin Lauret
Nicolas Courbin
Olivier Scher
Aurélien Besnard
author_facet Valentin Lauret
Nicolas Courbin
Olivier Scher
Aurélien Besnard
author_sort Valentin Lauret
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Tracking data and spatial surveys (e.g., counts) contribute to understanding animal distribution despite highlighting complementary aspects of habitat selection, from detailed insights on few individuals to raw inferences for the population, respectively. Here, we showcased how to combine individual tracking and count data to estimate habitat selection at the population level. We developed an integrated model that provides a joint estimation of habitat selection for tracking data fitted with a resource selection function (RSF) and count data fitted with a Poisson generalized linear model (GLM), both respecting the statistical conditions for converging with an inhomogeneous Poisson point process. We tested our integrated habitat selection model using simulated movement data and a real case study of GPS‐tracked Sandwich terns (Thalasseus sandvicensis) in the French Mediterranean Sea. Simulations showed that the integrated model correctly estimated habitat selection coefficients and benefited from both data sources with better accuracy and precision than RSF and Poisson GLM alone, especially when data are limited. Overall, our study formalized an easy‐to‐use approach for the integration of tracking and count data to estimate habitat selection, contributing to a promising research avenue, since individual tracking and spatial survey monitoring are abundant in many ecological contexts.
format Article
id doaj-art-11af8ba2d52b4946970bbb0fdedc885f
institution Kabale University
issn 2150-8925
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj-art-11af8ba2d52b4946970bbb0fdedc885f2025-08-20T03:48:13ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252025-05-01165n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70283Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distributionValentin Lauret0Nicolas Courbin1Olivier Scher2Aurélien Besnard3CEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier FranceCEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier FranceCEN Occitanie Montpellier FranceCEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE PSL University, IRD Montpellier FranceAbstract Tracking data and spatial surveys (e.g., counts) contribute to understanding animal distribution despite highlighting complementary aspects of habitat selection, from detailed insights on few individuals to raw inferences for the population, respectively. Here, we showcased how to combine individual tracking and count data to estimate habitat selection at the population level. We developed an integrated model that provides a joint estimation of habitat selection for tracking data fitted with a resource selection function (RSF) and count data fitted with a Poisson generalized linear model (GLM), both respecting the statistical conditions for converging with an inhomogeneous Poisson point process. We tested our integrated habitat selection model using simulated movement data and a real case study of GPS‐tracked Sandwich terns (Thalasseus sandvicensis) in the French Mediterranean Sea. Simulations showed that the integrated model correctly estimated habitat selection coefficients and benefited from both data sources with better accuracy and precision than RSF and Poisson GLM alone, especially when data are limited. Overall, our study formalized an easy‐to‐use approach for the integration of tracking and count data to estimate habitat selection, contributing to a promising research avenue, since individual tracking and spatial survey monitoring are abundant in many ecological contexts.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70283data integrationhabitat selectioninhomogeneous Poisson point processmovement ecologyresource selection functionspecies distribution models
spellingShingle Valentin Lauret
Nicolas Courbin
Olivier Scher
Aurélien Besnard
Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution
Ecosphere
data integration
habitat selection
inhomogeneous Poisson point process
movement ecology
resource selection function
species distribution models
title Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution
title_full Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution
title_fullStr Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution
title_full_unstemmed Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution
title_short Integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution
title_sort integrating individual tracking data and spatial surveys to improve estimation of animal spatial distribution
topic data integration
habitat selection
inhomogeneous Poisson point process
movement ecology
resource selection function
species distribution models
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70283
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinlauret integratingindividualtrackingdataandspatialsurveystoimproveestimationofanimalspatialdistribution
AT nicolascourbin integratingindividualtrackingdataandspatialsurveystoimproveestimationofanimalspatialdistribution
AT olivierscher integratingindividualtrackingdataandspatialsurveystoimproveestimationofanimalspatialdistribution
AT aurelienbesnard integratingindividualtrackingdataandspatialsurveystoimproveestimationofanimalspatialdistribution