The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets

BackgroundSeveral high-income countries have announced plans to reduce the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in their population diets. Their current A:P ratio is around 65:35, with two thirds of the protein coming from animal sources, meat, eggs, and dairy. Efforts to reduce the dietary A:P prot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Drewnowski, Kayla Hooker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1518793/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856958250156032
author Adam Drewnowski
Kayla Hooker
author_facet Adam Drewnowski
Kayla Hooker
author_sort Adam Drewnowski
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundSeveral high-income countries have announced plans to reduce the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in their population diets. Their current A:P ratio is around 65:35, with two thirds of the protein coming from animal sources, meat, eggs, and dairy. Efforts to reduce the dietary A:P protein ratio to 50:50, 40:60, or below are sometimes referred to as a “healthy protein transition.”MethodsAnalyses of Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Bank data were used to show that an opposing and far more important protein transition is taking place globally.ResultsIn most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the dietary A:P protein ratio was closely associated with, if not determined, by gross national incomes (GNI). As incomes rise, LMIC populations adopt more varied and more nutrient-rich diets with more animal proteins and especially meat. This protein transition, manifested by a strong observed relation between rising incomes and higher A:P protein ratios, follows a well-known principle of economics known as Bennett’s Law.ConclusionConsumer education and regulatory and policy measures aimed at reducing dietary A:P protein ratios worldwide may not uncouple the fundamental relation between powerful economic forces and global diet structures.
format Article
id doaj-art-11aad26638c44e9a90234a65e4272ce4
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-861X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Nutrition
spelling doaj-art-11aad26638c44e9a90234a65e4272ce42025-02-12T05:15:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2025-02-011210.3389/fnut.2025.15187931518793The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global dietsAdam Drewnowski0Kayla Hooker1Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United StatesBackgroundSeveral high-income countries have announced plans to reduce the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in their population diets. Their current A:P ratio is around 65:35, with two thirds of the protein coming from animal sources, meat, eggs, and dairy. Efforts to reduce the dietary A:P protein ratio to 50:50, 40:60, or below are sometimes referred to as a “healthy protein transition.”MethodsAnalyses of Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Bank data were used to show that an opposing and far more important protein transition is taking place globally.ResultsIn most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the dietary A:P protein ratio was closely associated with, if not determined, by gross national incomes (GNI). As incomes rise, LMIC populations adopt more varied and more nutrient-rich diets with more animal proteins and especially meat. This protein transition, manifested by a strong observed relation between rising incomes and higher A:P protein ratios, follows a well-known principle of economics known as Bennett’s Law.ConclusionConsumer education and regulatory and policy measures aimed at reducing dietary A:P protein ratios worldwide may not uncouple the fundamental relation between powerful economic forces and global diet structures.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1518793/fullprotein transitionanimal:plant protein ratiosFAO Food balance sheetsWorld Bank income classificationBennett’s lawanimal-based proteins
spellingShingle Adam Drewnowski
Kayla Hooker
The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets
Frontiers in Nutrition
protein transition
animal:plant protein ratios
FAO Food balance sheets
World Bank income classification
Bennett’s law
animal-based proteins
title The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets
title_full The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets
title_fullStr The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets
title_full_unstemmed The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets
title_short The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets
title_sort protein transition what determines the animal to plant a p protein ratios in global diets
topic protein transition
animal:plant protein ratios
FAO Food balance sheets
World Bank income classification
Bennett’s law
animal-based proteins
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1518793/full
work_keys_str_mv AT adamdrewnowski theproteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets
AT kaylahooker theproteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets
AT adamdrewnowski proteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets
AT kaylahooker proteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets