The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets
BackgroundSeveral high-income countries have announced plans to reduce the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in their population diets. Their current A:P ratio is around 65:35, with two thirds of the protein coming from animal sources, meat, eggs, and dairy. Efforts to reduce the dietary A:P prot...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Nutrition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1518793/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823856958250156032 |
---|---|
author | Adam Drewnowski Kayla Hooker |
author_facet | Adam Drewnowski Kayla Hooker |
author_sort | Adam Drewnowski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BackgroundSeveral high-income countries have announced plans to reduce the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in their population diets. Their current A:P ratio is around 65:35, with two thirds of the protein coming from animal sources, meat, eggs, and dairy. Efforts to reduce the dietary A:P protein ratio to 50:50, 40:60, or below are sometimes referred to as a “healthy protein transition.”MethodsAnalyses of Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Bank data were used to show that an opposing and far more important protein transition is taking place globally.ResultsIn most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the dietary A:P protein ratio was closely associated with, if not determined, by gross national incomes (GNI). As incomes rise, LMIC populations adopt more varied and more nutrient-rich diets with more animal proteins and especially meat. This protein transition, manifested by a strong observed relation between rising incomes and higher A:P protein ratios, follows a well-known principle of economics known as Bennett’s Law.ConclusionConsumer education and regulatory and policy measures aimed at reducing dietary A:P protein ratios worldwide may not uncouple the fundamental relation between powerful economic forces and global diet structures. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-11aad26638c44e9a90234a65e4272ce4 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2296-861X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Nutrition |
spelling | doaj-art-11aad26638c44e9a90234a65e4272ce42025-02-12T05:15:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2025-02-011210.3389/fnut.2025.15187931518793The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global dietsAdam Drewnowski0Kayla Hooker1Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United StatesBackgroundSeveral high-income countries have announced plans to reduce the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in their population diets. Their current A:P ratio is around 65:35, with two thirds of the protein coming from animal sources, meat, eggs, and dairy. Efforts to reduce the dietary A:P protein ratio to 50:50, 40:60, or below are sometimes referred to as a “healthy protein transition.”MethodsAnalyses of Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Bank data were used to show that an opposing and far more important protein transition is taking place globally.ResultsIn most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the dietary A:P protein ratio was closely associated with, if not determined, by gross national incomes (GNI). As incomes rise, LMIC populations adopt more varied and more nutrient-rich diets with more animal proteins and especially meat. This protein transition, manifested by a strong observed relation between rising incomes and higher A:P protein ratios, follows a well-known principle of economics known as Bennett’s Law.ConclusionConsumer education and regulatory and policy measures aimed at reducing dietary A:P protein ratios worldwide may not uncouple the fundamental relation between powerful economic forces and global diet structures.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1518793/fullprotein transitionanimal:plant protein ratiosFAO Food balance sheetsWorld Bank income classificationBennett’s lawanimal-based proteins |
spellingShingle | Adam Drewnowski Kayla Hooker The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets Frontiers in Nutrition protein transition animal:plant protein ratios FAO Food balance sheets World Bank income classification Bennett’s law animal-based proteins |
title | The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets |
title_full | The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets |
title_fullStr | The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets |
title_full_unstemmed | The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets |
title_short | The protein transition: what determines the animal-to-plant (A:P) protein ratios in global diets |
title_sort | protein transition what determines the animal to plant a p protein ratios in global diets |
topic | protein transition animal:plant protein ratios FAO Food balance sheets World Bank income classification Bennett’s law animal-based proteins |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1518793/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamdrewnowski theproteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets AT kaylahooker theproteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets AT adamdrewnowski proteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets AT kaylahooker proteintransitionwhatdeterminestheanimaltoplantapproteinratiosinglobaldiets |