Research ethics between regulation and reflexivity
In thirty years, research ethics spread across all scientific fields and strengthened its measures, criteria and procedures internationally. Linked to deontology and scientific integrity through multiplying regulations, it goes along with searchers and institutions in order to enable or obligate the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Société d'Anthropologie des Connaissances
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/rac/1116 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850199231476793344 |
|---|---|
| author | Sarah Carvallo |
| author_facet | Sarah Carvallo |
| author_sort | Sarah Carvallo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In thirty years, research ethics spread across all scientific fields and strengthened its measures, criteria and procedures internationally. Linked to deontology and scientific integrity through multiplying regulations, it goes along with searchers and institutions in order to enable or obligate them to fulfil their responsibilities and heighten citizens’ trust towards science and scientists. If it is supposed to ensure consensus-building of all relevant stakeholders and to clarify norms of what is or should be a good research, it also leads to pressures and constraints that generate confusion, tensions, even inconsistency with other norms such as efficiency, acceleration, globalization or competition, but also with serendipity, freedom or reflexivity. Analyzing rhetoric and practices highlights research ethics as a problem rather than a solution. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1187f6ba6f4d44e3b74901d804a7564d |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1760-5393 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
| publisher | Société d'Anthropologie des Connaissances |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances |
| spelling | doaj-art-1187f6ba6f4d44e3b74901d804a7564d2025-08-20T02:12:41ZfraSociété d'Anthropologie des ConnaissancesRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances1760-53932019-06-0113210.3917/rac.043.0327Research ethics between regulation and reflexivitySarah CarvalloIn thirty years, research ethics spread across all scientific fields and strengthened its measures, criteria and procedures internationally. Linked to deontology and scientific integrity through multiplying regulations, it goes along with searchers and institutions in order to enable or obligate them to fulfil their responsibilities and heighten citizens’ trust towards science and scientists. If it is supposed to ensure consensus-building of all relevant stakeholders and to clarify norms of what is or should be a good research, it also leads to pressures and constraints that generate confusion, tensions, even inconsistency with other norms such as efficiency, acceleration, globalization or competition, but also with serendipity, freedom or reflexivity. Analyzing rhetoric and practices highlights research ethics as a problem rather than a solution.https://journals.openedition.org/rac/1116reflexivityresearchethicsnormvalueprocedure |
| spellingShingle | Sarah Carvallo Research ethics between regulation and reflexivity Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances reflexivity research ethics norm value procedure |
| title | Research ethics between regulation and reflexivity |
| title_full | Research ethics between regulation and reflexivity |
| title_fullStr | Research ethics between regulation and reflexivity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Research ethics between regulation and reflexivity |
| title_short | Research ethics between regulation and reflexivity |
| title_sort | research ethics between regulation and reflexivity |
| topic | reflexivity research ethics norm value procedure |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/rac/1116 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sarahcarvallo researchethicsbetweenregulationandreflexivity |