Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review
Objective. The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the existing evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of treatment options in IBD. Methods. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify economic evaluations of IBD therapy. The literature search was performed usi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7439730 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850236842567270400 |
|---|---|
| author | Lachaine Jean Miron Audrey Catherine Beauchemin on behalf of the iGenoMed Consortium |
| author_facet | Lachaine Jean Miron Audrey Catherine Beauchemin on behalf of the iGenoMed Consortium |
| author_sort | Lachaine Jean |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective. The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the existing evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of treatment options in IBD. Methods. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify economic evaluations of IBD therapy. The literature search was performed using electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE. Searches were limited to full economic evaluations published in English or French between 2004 and 2016. Results. A total of 5,403 potentially relevant studies were identified. After screening titles and abstracts, 48 studies were included, according to the eligibility criteria. A total of 56% and 42% of the studies were assessing treatments of UC or CD, respectively. Treatment options under evaluation included biological agents, mesalamine, immunosuppressants, and surgery. The majority of studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of biological treatments. Biological therapies were dominant in 23% of the analyses and were cost-effective according to a $CAD50,000/QALY and $CAD100,000/QALY threshold in 41% and 62% of the analyses, respectively. Conclusion. This literature review provided a comprehensive overview of the economic evaluations for the different treatment options for IBD over the past 12 years and represents a helpful reference for future economic evaluations. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-113f3b816f254410a8a857dafdf2d1d1 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2291-2789 2291-2797 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
| spelling | doaj-art-113f3b816f254410a8a857dafdf2d1d12025-08-20T02:01:53ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2291-27892291-27972018-01-01201810.1155/2018/74397307439730Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature ReviewLachaine Jean0Miron Audrey1Catherine Beauchemin2on behalf of the iGenoMed Consortium3Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, CanadaFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, CanadaFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, CanadaMontreal Heart Institute, 5000 Bélanger, Room S-6300, Montreal, QC, H1T 1C8, CanadaObjective. The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the existing evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of treatment options in IBD. Methods. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify economic evaluations of IBD therapy. The literature search was performed using electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE. Searches were limited to full economic evaluations published in English or French between 2004 and 2016. Results. A total of 5,403 potentially relevant studies were identified. After screening titles and abstracts, 48 studies were included, according to the eligibility criteria. A total of 56% and 42% of the studies were assessing treatments of UC or CD, respectively. Treatment options under evaluation included biological agents, mesalamine, immunosuppressants, and surgery. The majority of studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of biological treatments. Biological therapies were dominant in 23% of the analyses and were cost-effective according to a $CAD50,000/QALY and $CAD100,000/QALY threshold in 41% and 62% of the analyses, respectively. Conclusion. This literature review provided a comprehensive overview of the economic evaluations for the different treatment options for IBD over the past 12 years and represents a helpful reference for future economic evaluations.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7439730 |
| spellingShingle | Lachaine Jean Miron Audrey Catherine Beauchemin on behalf of the iGenoMed Consortium Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
| title | Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review |
| title_full | Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review |
| title_fullStr | Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review |
| title_short | Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review |
| title_sort | economic evaluations of treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases a literature review |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7439730 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lachainejean economicevaluationsoftreatmentsforinflammatoryboweldiseasesaliteraturereview AT mironaudrey economicevaluationsoftreatmentsforinflammatoryboweldiseasesaliteraturereview AT catherinebeauchemin economicevaluationsoftreatmentsforinflammatoryboweldiseasesaliteraturereview AT onbehalfoftheigenomedconsortium economicevaluationsoftreatmentsforinflammatoryboweldiseasesaliteraturereview |