Influence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in Uganda
Abstract Background Women in sub-Saharan Africa often lack agency to make their own contraceptive decisions, more so in rural settings. Evidence indicates that social networks influence contraceptive decision-making and behaviours but there is limited information on the dynamics between women and th...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | BMC Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23473-x |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849389240112119808 |
|---|---|
| author | Catherine Birabwa Dinah Amongin Peter Waiswa Beth Phillips Ronald Wasswa Lauren Suchman Erica Sedlander Kelsey Holt Lynn Atuyambe |
| author_facet | Catherine Birabwa Dinah Amongin Peter Waiswa Beth Phillips Ronald Wasswa Lauren Suchman Erica Sedlander Kelsey Holt Lynn Atuyambe |
| author_sort | Catherine Birabwa |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Women in sub-Saharan Africa often lack agency to make their own contraceptive decisions, more so in rural settings. Evidence indicates that social networks influence contraceptive decision-making and behaviours but there is limited information on the dynamics between women and their network members. We explored ways in which women’s social networks influenced their agency to make contraceptive decisions. Methods We conducted an exploratory qualitative study, between February and May 2021, among 60 women (15–45 years) from two largely rural districts in Uganda. Data were collected using semi-structured audio-recorded in-depth interviews which were transcribed verbatim. We used thematic analysis guided by constructs from social network mechanisms to analyze the data. Results Half of the participants were adolescents (15–19 years) and 62% (37/60) were current contraception users. We found that participants most commonly involved partners, relatives, and peers in their contraceptive decision-making. Social support emerged as the most common mechanism through which these network members influenced women’s agency in making and acting on their contraceptive decisions. This was mainly in the form of informational and emotional support. Informational support, mostly provided by relatives and peers, included advice to adopt contraception particularly given to participants who desired to better manage their families, describing lived experiences, directing women to formal contraceptive services, and sharing perceived/actual side effects of contraceptive use. Emotional support, provided by partners and relatives, involved acknowledging and validating decisions, as well as providing reassurance regarding contraceptive experiences. Some women also received instrumental support (reminders to get dose/method and exempting women from responsibilities to go seek contraceptive services). The mechanism of social influence was also at play with social pressure to give birth. Conclusions Our study highlights how different types of social support from partners, relatives, and peers can either bolster or undermine women’s agency in making contraceptive decisions. Informational support from relatives and peers can boost women’s certainty in their intentions, while emotional support from partners boosts their confidence to act on these intentions. Multipronged approaches targeting these networks are necessary to promote women’s agency in making contraceptive decisions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-110fe88a743842998b0245db8ea81093 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1471-2458 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Public Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-110fe88a743842998b0245db8ea810932025-08-20T03:42:01ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-07-0125111010.1186/s12889-025-23473-xInfluence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in UgandaCatherine Birabwa0Dinah Amongin1Peter Waiswa2Beth Phillips3Ronald Wasswa4Lauren Suchman5Erica Sedlander6Kelsey Holt7Lynn Atuyambe8Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of CaliforniaInstitute for Health and Aging, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University School of Public HealthAbstract Background Women in sub-Saharan Africa often lack agency to make their own contraceptive decisions, more so in rural settings. Evidence indicates that social networks influence contraceptive decision-making and behaviours but there is limited information on the dynamics between women and their network members. We explored ways in which women’s social networks influenced their agency to make contraceptive decisions. Methods We conducted an exploratory qualitative study, between February and May 2021, among 60 women (15–45 years) from two largely rural districts in Uganda. Data were collected using semi-structured audio-recorded in-depth interviews which were transcribed verbatim. We used thematic analysis guided by constructs from social network mechanisms to analyze the data. Results Half of the participants were adolescents (15–19 years) and 62% (37/60) were current contraception users. We found that participants most commonly involved partners, relatives, and peers in their contraceptive decision-making. Social support emerged as the most common mechanism through which these network members influenced women’s agency in making and acting on their contraceptive decisions. This was mainly in the form of informational and emotional support. Informational support, mostly provided by relatives and peers, included advice to adopt contraception particularly given to participants who desired to better manage their families, describing lived experiences, directing women to formal contraceptive services, and sharing perceived/actual side effects of contraceptive use. Emotional support, provided by partners and relatives, involved acknowledging and validating decisions, as well as providing reassurance regarding contraceptive experiences. Some women also received instrumental support (reminders to get dose/method and exempting women from responsibilities to go seek contraceptive services). The mechanism of social influence was also at play with social pressure to give birth. Conclusions Our study highlights how different types of social support from partners, relatives, and peers can either bolster or undermine women’s agency in making contraceptive decisions. Informational support from relatives and peers can boost women’s certainty in their intentions, while emotional support from partners boosts their confidence to act on these intentions. Multipronged approaches targeting these networks are necessary to promote women’s agency in making contraceptive decisions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23473-xSocial networksContraceptive decision-makingUgandaNetwork mechanismsContraceptionFamily planning |
| spellingShingle | Catherine Birabwa Dinah Amongin Peter Waiswa Beth Phillips Ronald Wasswa Lauren Suchman Erica Sedlander Kelsey Holt Lynn Atuyambe Influence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in Uganda BMC Public Health Social networks Contraceptive decision-making Uganda Network mechanisms Contraception Family planning |
| title | Influence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in Uganda |
| title_full | Influence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in Uganda |
| title_fullStr | Influence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in Uganda |
| title_full_unstemmed | Influence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in Uganda |
| title_short | Influence of social networks on women’s contraceptive decision-making and action: a qualitative study in two districts in Uganda |
| title_sort | influence of social networks on women s contraceptive decision making and action a qualitative study in two districts in uganda |
| topic | Social networks Contraceptive decision-making Uganda Network mechanisms Contraception Family planning |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23473-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT catherinebirabwa influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT dinahamongin influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT peterwaiswa influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT bethphillips influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT ronaldwasswa influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT laurensuchman influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT ericasedlander influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT kelseyholt influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda AT lynnatuyambe influenceofsocialnetworksonwomenscontraceptivedecisionmakingandactionaqualitativestudyintwodistrictsinuganda |