‘We Need to Ask Ourselves’: We, As A Marker of (Inter)Subjectivity in Academic Debate
This paper combines Langacker’s notion of intersubjectivity with research into the discursive purposes of the first-person plural to analyse the 2008 debate between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox Has Science Buried God? The analysis identifies several differences and similarities between the debate...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Barczewska Shala |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0022 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
WE INTER-ARE: THE PANDEMIC CHALLENGE REDEFINING HUMANS AND COMMUNITIES
by: K. Abraham
Published: (2023-04-01) -
Debate. Political Work from a Qualitative Perspective: Contributions for the Analysis of Subjectivities
by: Mauricio Bustamante
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Building, Encoding, and Annotating a Corpus of Parliamentary Debates in TEI XML: A Cross-Linguistic Account
by: Naomi Truan, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Inter-subjectivity and Domestication in the Making of a Global Region: Territorialization of Salmon in the Chilean Patagonia
by: Gustavo Blanco Wells, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
¿Cómo debaten ahora los catalanes del contenido de la independencia?
by: Cyril Trépier
Published: (2016-07-01)