The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication Ability
Social studies education is very important for training communication skills in students up to college, because debate method training is an alternative for forcing students to communicate through pressure (pro-con opinions). This research aims to analyze the relationship between the use of the deb...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
2024-08-01
|
| Series: | Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JLLS/article/view/77309 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850022860976816128 |
|---|---|
| author | Mukti Kanaya Sidiq Ali Mustadi |
| author_facet | Mukti Kanaya Sidiq Ali Mustadi |
| author_sort | Mukti Kanaya Sidiq |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Social studies education is very important for training communication skills in students up to college, because debate method training is an alternative for forcing students to communicate through pressure (pro-con opinions). This research aims to analyze the relationship between the use of the debate learning model and students' communication skills in MI/SD Basic Social Sciences learning. The type of research used is Quasi Experiment with a Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design research design. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and documentation. The results of the research are that the average result of the experimental class pretest is in the 0-54 interval, namely 53.53 and is in the very low criteria. Meanwhile, the control class pretest results were in the 0-54 interval, namely 47.30 and were in the very low criteria. The average results of the experimental class post-test were in the 65-79 interval, namely 65.43 and were in the medium criteria, while the control class post-test results were in the 0-54 interval, namely 50.53 and were in the very low criteria. . The probability value for the hypothesis test results, namely (2-tailed) is 0.000. Thus, Ha is accepted, Ho is rejected because 0.000<0.005, so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in the average score of the communication ability test in the experimental group and the control group.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-107435cb88de4d1187bdbf69b3dcc1c0 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2615-6148 2615-7330 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-08-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-107435cb88de4d1187bdbf69b3dcc1c02025-08-20T03:01:32ZengUniversitas Pendidikan GaneshaJournal for Lesson and Learning Studies2615-61482615-73302024-08-017210.23887/jlls.v7i2.77309The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication AbilityMukti Kanaya Sidiq0Ali Mustadi1Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaUniversitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Social studies education is very important for training communication skills in students up to college, because debate method training is an alternative for forcing students to communicate through pressure (pro-con opinions). This research aims to analyze the relationship between the use of the debate learning model and students' communication skills in MI/SD Basic Social Sciences learning. The type of research used is Quasi Experiment with a Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design research design. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and documentation. The results of the research are that the average result of the experimental class pretest is in the 0-54 interval, namely 53.53 and is in the very low criteria. Meanwhile, the control class pretest results were in the 0-54 interval, namely 47.30 and were in the very low criteria. The average results of the experimental class post-test were in the 65-79 interval, namely 65.43 and were in the medium criteria, while the control class post-test results were in the 0-54 interval, namely 50.53 and were in the very low criteria. . The probability value for the hypothesis test results, namely (2-tailed) is 0.000. Thus, Ha is accepted, Ho is rejected because 0.000<0.005, so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in the average score of the communication ability test in the experimental group and the control group. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JLLS/article/view/77309Communication SkillsDebate MethodsSocial Studies Learning |
| spellingShingle | Mukti Kanaya Sidiq Ali Mustadi The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication Ability Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies Communication Skills Debate Methods Social Studies Learning |
| title | The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication Ability |
| title_full | The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication Ability |
| title_fullStr | The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication Ability |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication Ability |
| title_short | The Impact of Debate Method on Prospective Elementary Schools’ Communication Ability |
| title_sort | impact of debate method on prospective elementary schools communication ability |
| topic | Communication Skills Debate Methods Social Studies Learning |
| url | https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JLLS/article/view/77309 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muktikanayasidiq theimpactofdebatemethodonprospectiveelementaryschoolscommunicationability AT alimustadi theimpactofdebatemethodonprospectiveelementaryschoolscommunicationability AT muktikanayasidiq impactofdebatemethodonprospectiveelementaryschoolscommunicationability AT alimustadi impactofdebatemethodonprospectiveelementaryschoolscommunicationability |