THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCK
This article presents a study of three different evaluation methods for one of the most frequently evaluated skills in physical education: straddle vault over the buck. The sample of measured subjects included 193 13-year-old boys, whose video-recorded performances were evaluated by three evaluator...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
2016-06-01
|
| Series: | Science of Gymnastics Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uni-lj.si/sgj/article/view/22228 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850095380111294464 |
|---|---|
| author | Matej Majerič Janko Strel Marjeta Kovač |
| author_facet | Matej Majerič Janko Strel Marjeta Kovač |
| author_sort | Matej Majerič |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This article presents a study of three different evaluation methods for one of the most frequently evaluated skills in physical education: straddle vault over the buck. The sample of measured subjects included 193 13-year-old boys, whose video-recorded performances were evaluated by three evaluators. We analysed the differences in the reliability, objectivity and time efficiency of three different evaluation methods. The calculation of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and analysis of the variance has been used. The analysis of reliability revealed that the combined evaluation method (alpha: 0.928) was the most reliable, the holistic method was less reliable (alpha: 0.879), and the least reliable was the analytical evaluation method (alpha: 0.833). The analysis of objectivity showed that the analytical evaluation method was the most objective (alpha: 0.854), the combined method was less objective (alpha: 0.791), and that the holistic evaluation methods were the least objective method (alpha: 0.778). The analysis of time efficiency revealed that the least time had been spent in the holistic evaluation method and much more in analytical and combined evaluation method. Analysis of the three evaluators, using three different evaluation methods showed no statistically significant differences (p=0.638) between the holistic and combined evaluation method. In contrast, statistically significant differences have been found between the holistic and analytical method (p=0.000) and combined and analytical method (p=0.000). According to the analysis, we can conclude that all three evaluation methods are appropriate for the evaluation of pupils’ knowledge in physical education.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1036b097781742df872382096c3af2fc |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1855-7171 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-06-01 |
| publisher | University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Science of Gymnastics Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-1036b097781742df872382096c3af2fc2025-08-20T02:41:27ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Science of Gymnastics Journal1855-71712016-06-018210.52165/sgj.8.2.167-186THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCKMatej Majerič0Janko Strel1Marjeta Kovač2Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, SloveniaFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, SloveniaFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia This article presents a study of three different evaluation methods for one of the most frequently evaluated skills in physical education: straddle vault over the buck. The sample of measured subjects included 193 13-year-old boys, whose video-recorded performances were evaluated by three evaluators. We analysed the differences in the reliability, objectivity and time efficiency of three different evaluation methods. The calculation of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and analysis of the variance has been used. The analysis of reliability revealed that the combined evaluation method (alpha: 0.928) was the most reliable, the holistic method was less reliable (alpha: 0.879), and the least reliable was the analytical evaluation method (alpha: 0.833). The analysis of objectivity showed that the analytical evaluation method was the most objective (alpha: 0.854), the combined method was less objective (alpha: 0.791), and that the holistic evaluation methods were the least objective method (alpha: 0.778). The analysis of time efficiency revealed that the least time had been spent in the holistic evaluation method and much more in analytical and combined evaluation method. Analysis of the three evaluators, using three different evaluation methods showed no statistically significant differences (p=0.638) between the holistic and combined evaluation method. In contrast, statistically significant differences have been found between the holistic and analytical method (p=0.000) and combined and analytical method (p=0.000). According to the analysis, we can conclude that all three evaluation methods are appropriate for the evaluation of pupils’ knowledge in physical education. https://journals.uni-lj.si/sgj/article/view/22228Physical educationgymnasticstest taskevaluation guidelines |
| spellingShingle | Matej Majerič Janko Strel Marjeta Kovač THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCK Science of Gymnastics Journal Physical education gymnastics test task evaluation guidelines |
| title | THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCK |
| title_full | THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCK |
| title_fullStr | THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCK |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCK |
| title_short | THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY OF STRADDLE VAULT OVER THE BUCK |
| title_sort | importance of different evaluation methods in physical education a case study of straddle vault over the buck |
| topic | Physical education gymnastics test task evaluation guidelines |
| url | https://journals.uni-lj.si/sgj/article/view/22228 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT matejmajeric theimportanceofdifferentevaluationmethodsinphysicaleducationacasestudyofstraddlevaultoverthebuck AT jankostrel theimportanceofdifferentevaluationmethodsinphysicaleducationacasestudyofstraddlevaultoverthebuck AT marjetakovac theimportanceofdifferentevaluationmethodsinphysicaleducationacasestudyofstraddlevaultoverthebuck AT matejmajeric importanceofdifferentevaluationmethodsinphysicaleducationacasestudyofstraddlevaultoverthebuck AT jankostrel importanceofdifferentevaluationmethodsinphysicaleducationacasestudyofstraddlevaultoverthebuck AT marjetakovac importanceofdifferentevaluationmethodsinphysicaleducationacasestudyofstraddlevaultoverthebuck |