Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.

<h4>Background</h4>A role of Chlamydia trachomatis in HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis has been reported for cervical cancer but studies on cervical adenocarcinoma are limited.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 1,553 cervical smears taken up to 26 years before diagnosis in a large...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vitaly Smelov, Tarik Gheit, Karin Sundström, Alexander Ploner, Sandrine McKay-Chopin, Carina Eklund, Massimo Tommasino, Joakim Dillner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156215&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850232423693942784
author Vitaly Smelov
Tarik Gheit
Karin Sundström
Alexander Ploner
Sandrine McKay-Chopin
Carina Eklund
Massimo Tommasino
Joakim Dillner
author_facet Vitaly Smelov
Tarik Gheit
Karin Sundström
Alexander Ploner
Sandrine McKay-Chopin
Carina Eklund
Massimo Tommasino
Joakim Dillner
author_sort Vitaly Smelov
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>A role of Chlamydia trachomatis in HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis has been reported for cervical cancer but studies on cervical adenocarcinoma are limited.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 1,553 cervical smears taken up to 26 years before diagnosis in a large population-based nested case-control study of cervical adenocarcinoma (AC, 132 cases with matched controls), and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, 159 cases with matched controls) were tested for C. trachomatis and HPV DNA by a type-specific PCR bead-based multiplex genotyping (TS-MPG) assay.<h4>Results</h4>Only 1.7% of samples were positive for C. trachomatis, with no significant differences between AC/AIS cases and controls. HPV-positivity was detected in 49.3% of C. trachomatis-negative and 65.4% C. trachomatis-positive samples, respectively.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A large prospective study did not find any risk for cervical adenocarcinoma and/or AIS conferred by C. trachomatis infection.<h4>Impact</h4>C. trachomatis appears not to be involved in cervical adenocarcinomas.
format Article
id doaj-art-10369c889a414edab7e9d0dd2bb6faee
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-10369c889a414edab7e9d0dd2bb6faee2025-08-20T02:03:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01115e015621510.1371/journal.pone.0156215Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.Vitaly SmelovTarik GheitKarin SundströmAlexander PlonerSandrine McKay-ChopinCarina EklundMassimo TommasinoJoakim Dillner<h4>Background</h4>A role of Chlamydia trachomatis in HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis has been reported for cervical cancer but studies on cervical adenocarcinoma are limited.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 1,553 cervical smears taken up to 26 years before diagnosis in a large population-based nested case-control study of cervical adenocarcinoma (AC, 132 cases with matched controls), and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, 159 cases with matched controls) were tested for C. trachomatis and HPV DNA by a type-specific PCR bead-based multiplex genotyping (TS-MPG) assay.<h4>Results</h4>Only 1.7% of samples were positive for C. trachomatis, with no significant differences between AC/AIS cases and controls. HPV-positivity was detected in 49.3% of C. trachomatis-negative and 65.4% C. trachomatis-positive samples, respectively.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A large prospective study did not find any risk for cervical adenocarcinoma and/or AIS conferred by C. trachomatis infection.<h4>Impact</h4>C. trachomatis appears not to be involved in cervical adenocarcinomas.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156215&type=printable
spellingShingle Vitaly Smelov
Tarik Gheit
Karin Sundström
Alexander Ploner
Sandrine McKay-Chopin
Carina Eklund
Massimo Tommasino
Joakim Dillner
Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.
PLoS ONE
title Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.
title_full Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.
title_fullStr Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.
title_full_unstemmed Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.
title_short Lack of Significant Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Cervical Adenocarcinoma Risk: Nested Case-Control Study.
title_sort lack of significant effects of chlamydia trachomatis infection on cervical adenocarcinoma risk nested case control study
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156215&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT vitalysmelov lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy
AT tarikgheit lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy
AT karinsundstrom lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy
AT alexanderploner lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy
AT sandrinemckaychopin lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy
AT carinaeklund lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy
AT massimotommasino lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy
AT joakimdillner lackofsignificanteffectsofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectiononcervicaladenocarcinomarisknestedcasecontrolstudy