Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for Magnetostratigraphy

Abstract Dating of upper Miocene sediments of the Pannonian Basin (Hungary) has proven difficult due to the endemic nature of biota, scarcity of reliable radio isotopic data, and generally inconsistent magnetostratigraphic results. The natural remanent magnetization (NRM) is mostly residing in greig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick A. Kelder, Karin Sant, Mark J. Dekkers, Imre Magyar, Gijs A. vanDijk, Ymke Z. Lathouwers, Orsolya Sztanó, Wout Krijgsman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-09-01
Series:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007673
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849471628437618688
author Nick A. Kelder
Karin Sant
Mark J. Dekkers
Imre Magyar
Gijs A. vanDijk
Ymke Z. Lathouwers
Orsolya Sztanó
Wout Krijgsman
author_facet Nick A. Kelder
Karin Sant
Mark J. Dekkers
Imre Magyar
Gijs A. vanDijk
Ymke Z. Lathouwers
Orsolya Sztanó
Wout Krijgsman
author_sort Nick A. Kelder
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Dating of upper Miocene sediments of the Pannonian Basin (Hungary) has proven difficult due to the endemic nature of biota, scarcity of reliable radio isotopic data, and generally inconsistent magnetostratigraphic results. The natural remanent magnetization (NRM) is mostly residing in greigite (Fe3S4), which complicates NRM interpretation. We reinvestigate the viability of these sediments for magnetostratigraphy using samples from recently drilled well cores (PAET‐30 and PAET‐34) from the Paks region. Significant intervals of the cores contain composite NRM behavior. Thermal demagnetization results include multipolarity (M‐type) samples consisting of a low‐temperature (LT, above ~120 °C), a medium‐temperature (MT), and a high‐temperature (HT) component, within distinct temperature ranges and all exhibiting dual polarities. The LT and HT components have the same polarity and are antiparallel to the MT component. Rock magnetic and scanning electron microscopy results indicate that all magnetic components reside in authigenic greigite. The LT and HT components represent the characteristic remanent magnetization and are of early diagenetic origin. The MT component records a late diagenetic overprint. Alternating field demagnetization cannot resolve the individual components: it yields polarities corresponding to the dominant component resulting in erratic polarity patterns. Interpretation of LT and HT components allows a reasonably robust magnetostratigraphic correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale with the base of PAET‐30 at ~8.4 Ma and its top at ~6.8 Ma (average sedimentation rate of ~30 cm/kyr). The base of PAET‐34 is correlated to ~9 Ma and its top to ~6.8 Ma (average sedimentation rate of 27 cm/kyr).
format Article
id doaj-art-100018d583d34649bd6fee36cebf543e
institution Kabale University
issn 1525-2027
language English
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj-art-100018d583d34649bd6fee36cebf543e2025-08-20T03:24:47ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272018-09-011993405342910.1029/2018GC007673Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for MagnetostratigraphyNick A. Kelder0Karin Sant1Mark J. Dekkers2Imre Magyar3Gijs A. vanDijk4Ymke Z. Lathouwers5Orsolya Sztanó6Wout Krijgsman7Paleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk, Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsPaleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk, Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsPaleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk, Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsMTA‐MTM‐ELTE Research Group for Paleontology Budapest HungaryPaleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk, Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsPaleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk, Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsDepartment of Physical and Applied Geology Eötvös Loránd University Budapest HungaryPaleomagnetic Laboratory Fort Hoofddijk, Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsAbstract Dating of upper Miocene sediments of the Pannonian Basin (Hungary) has proven difficult due to the endemic nature of biota, scarcity of reliable radio isotopic data, and generally inconsistent magnetostratigraphic results. The natural remanent magnetization (NRM) is mostly residing in greigite (Fe3S4), which complicates NRM interpretation. We reinvestigate the viability of these sediments for magnetostratigraphy using samples from recently drilled well cores (PAET‐30 and PAET‐34) from the Paks region. Significant intervals of the cores contain composite NRM behavior. Thermal demagnetization results include multipolarity (M‐type) samples consisting of a low‐temperature (LT, above ~120 °C), a medium‐temperature (MT), and a high‐temperature (HT) component, within distinct temperature ranges and all exhibiting dual polarities. The LT and HT components have the same polarity and are antiparallel to the MT component. Rock magnetic and scanning electron microscopy results indicate that all magnetic components reside in authigenic greigite. The LT and HT components represent the characteristic remanent magnetization and are of early diagenetic origin. The MT component records a late diagenetic overprint. Alternating field demagnetization cannot resolve the individual components: it yields polarities corresponding to the dominant component resulting in erratic polarity patterns. Interpretation of LT and HT components allows a reasonably robust magnetostratigraphic correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale with the base of PAET‐30 at ~8.4 Ma and its top at ~6.8 Ma (average sedimentation rate of ~30 cm/kyr). The base of PAET‐34 is correlated to ~9 Ma and its top to ~6.8 Ma (average sedimentation rate of 27 cm/kyr).https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007673greigitemultipolarity NRMLake Pannonlate diageneticpaleomagnetic dating
spellingShingle Nick A. Kelder
Karin Sant
Mark J. Dekkers
Imre Magyar
Gijs A. vanDijk
Ymke Z. Lathouwers
Orsolya Sztanó
Wout Krijgsman
Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for Magnetostratigraphy
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
greigite
multipolarity NRM
Lake Pannon
late diagenetic
paleomagnetic dating
title Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for Magnetostratigraphy
title_full Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for Magnetostratigraphy
title_fullStr Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for Magnetostratigraphy
title_full_unstemmed Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for Magnetostratigraphy
title_short Paleomagnetism in Lake Pannon: Problems, Pitfalls, and Progress in Using Iron Sulfides for Magnetostratigraphy
title_sort paleomagnetism in lake pannon problems pitfalls and progress in using iron sulfides for magnetostratigraphy
topic greigite
multipolarity NRM
Lake Pannon
late diagenetic
paleomagnetic dating
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007673
work_keys_str_mv AT nickakelder paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy
AT karinsant paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy
AT markjdekkers paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy
AT imremagyar paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy
AT gijsavandijk paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy
AT ymkezlathouwers paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy
AT orsolyasztano paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy
AT woutkrijgsman paleomagnetisminlakepannonproblemspitfallsandprogressinusingironsulfidesformagnetostratigraphy