Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic Institute

Purpose. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of hepatospecific contrast-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase CT scan after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods. Thirty-four consecutive HCC patients (42 hepatic nodules) were treated with percutaneous RFA and un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vincenza Granata, Mario Petrillo, Roberta Fusco, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Elisabetta de Lutio di Castelguidone, Orlando Catalano, Mauro Piccirillo, Vittorio Albino, Francesco Izzo, Antonella Petrillo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/469097
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551994506608640
author Vincenza Granata
Mario Petrillo
Roberta Fusco
Sergio Venanzio Setola
Elisabetta de Lutio di Castelguidone
Orlando Catalano
Mauro Piccirillo
Vittorio Albino
Francesco Izzo
Antonella Petrillo
author_facet Vincenza Granata
Mario Petrillo
Roberta Fusco
Sergio Venanzio Setola
Elisabetta de Lutio di Castelguidone
Orlando Catalano
Mauro Piccirillo
Vittorio Albino
Francesco Izzo
Antonella Petrillo
author_sort Vincenza Granata
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of hepatospecific contrast-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase CT scan after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods. Thirty-four consecutive HCC patients (42 hepatic nodules) were treated with percutaneous RFA and underwent MR and CT scans. All patients were enrolled in a research protocol that included CT with iodized contrast medium injection and MR with hepatospecific contrast medium injection. All patients were restaged within four weeks and at 3 months from ablation. The images were reviewed by four different radiologists to evaluate tumor necrosis, residual or recurrence disease, and evidence of new foci. Results. Thirty-two nodules were necrotic after treatment; 10 showed residual disease. Six new HCCs were identified. At first month followup CT has identified 34 necrotic lesions and 8 residual diseases; no new foci were recognized. At MRI instead, 32 complete necrotic lesions were identified, 10 lesions showed residual disease, and 2 new HCCs were found. At three months, CT demonstrated 33 completely necrotic lesions, 9 residual diseases, and 2 new HCCs. MR showed 31 complete necrotic lesions, 11 cases of residual disease, and 6 new HCCs. Conclusions. Hepatospecific contrast-enhanced MRI is more effective than multiphase CT in assessment of HCC treated with RFA.
format Article
id doaj-art-0feed454609e45bf9fa7f5e43e26e902
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-0feed454609e45bf9fa7f5e43e26e9022025-02-03T05:59:46ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/469097469097Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic InstituteVincenza Granata0Mario Petrillo1Roberta Fusco2Sergio Venanzio Setola3Elisabetta de Lutio di Castelguidone4Orlando Catalano5Mauro Piccirillo6Vittorio Albino7Francesco Izzo8Antonella Petrillo9Division of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Abdominal Oncology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Abdominal Oncology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Abdominal Oncology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS”, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, ItalyPurpose. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of hepatospecific contrast-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase CT scan after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods. Thirty-four consecutive HCC patients (42 hepatic nodules) were treated with percutaneous RFA and underwent MR and CT scans. All patients were enrolled in a research protocol that included CT with iodized contrast medium injection and MR with hepatospecific contrast medium injection. All patients were restaged within four weeks and at 3 months from ablation. The images were reviewed by four different radiologists to evaluate tumor necrosis, residual or recurrence disease, and evidence of new foci. Results. Thirty-two nodules were necrotic after treatment; 10 showed residual disease. Six new HCCs were identified. At first month followup CT has identified 34 necrotic lesions and 8 residual diseases; no new foci were recognized. At MRI instead, 32 complete necrotic lesions were identified, 10 lesions showed residual disease, and 2 new HCCs were found. At three months, CT demonstrated 33 completely necrotic lesions, 9 residual diseases, and 2 new HCCs. MR showed 31 complete necrotic lesions, 11 cases of residual disease, and 6 new HCCs. Conclusions. Hepatospecific contrast-enhanced MRI is more effective than multiphase CT in assessment of HCC treated with RFA.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/469097
spellingShingle Vincenza Granata
Mario Petrillo
Roberta Fusco
Sergio Venanzio Setola
Elisabetta de Lutio di Castelguidone
Orlando Catalano
Mauro Piccirillo
Vittorio Albino
Francesco Izzo
Antonella Petrillo
Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic Institute
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic Institute
title_full Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic Institute
title_fullStr Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic Institute
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic Institute
title_short Surveillance of HCC Patients after Liver RFA: Role of MRI with Hepatospecific Contrast versus Three-Phase CT Scan—Experience of High Volume Oncologic Institute
title_sort surveillance of hcc patients after liver rfa role of mri with hepatospecific contrast versus three phase ct scan experience of high volume oncologic institute
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/469097
work_keys_str_mv AT vincenzagranata surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT mariopetrillo surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT robertafusco surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT sergiovenanziosetola surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT elisabettadelutiodicastelguidone surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT orlandocatalano surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT mauropiccirillo surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT vittorioalbino surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT francescoizzo surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute
AT antonellapetrillo surveillanceofhccpatientsafterliverrfaroleofmriwithhepatospecificcontrastversusthreephasectscanexperienceofhighvolumeoncologicinstitute