THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

The principle of legality of the criminal procedure is the established general rule according to which the criminal trial is carried out under the provisions stipulated by the law. In order to fully understand the application of the fundamental principle of legality of the criminal proceeding, it...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liliana-Dorina RĂDUCU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2019-05-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_027.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846098243584262144
author Liliana-Dorina RĂDUCU
author_facet Liliana-Dorina RĂDUCU
author_sort Liliana-Dorina RĂDUCU
collection DOAJ
description The principle of legality of the criminal procedure is the established general rule according to which the criminal trial is carried out under the provisions stipulated by the law. In order to fully understand the application of the fundamental principle of legality of the criminal proceeding, it is necessary to clarify, on the one hand, the notion of “criminal procedural law” - a term that does not have a legal definition and, on the other hand, it is necessary to analyze the evolution of the concept referring to the source of criminal procedural law, in the current conventional context, as well as in the context of the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence. Ensuring the application of the criminal process’ lawfulness is firstly achieved by the legislator’s fulfillment of the obligation to clearly regulate the rules of conducting the criminal proceedings and other judicial proceedings in connection with a criminal case. However, the actual reality proves the existence of numerous legal provisions declared unconstitutional, the Constitutional Court’s decisions being binding for both the legislator and the judicial bodies. Thus, the purpose of the research is to identify the consequence of the legislator’s lack of intervention so that the stipulations declared unconstitutional would agree with the Constitution’s provisions if it grants valences of some sources of law to the decisions of the Constitutional Court, if it transforms the Constitutional Court into a positive lawmaker or it just assigns the entire task of guaranteeing of the criminal process’ lawfulness to the judicial bodies. In fact, although the nullity is the main procedural guarantee of the legality of the criminal trial, the consequences of the Constitutional Court’s decisions raise many problems of unitary interpretation and application of the law even in this area, thus questioning the legality of the criminal process.
format Article
id doaj-art-0fd5fe2c24514a4d90edc5f660aae5f9
institution Kabale University
issn 2068-7796
language English
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
spelling doaj-art-0fd5fe2c24514a4d90edc5f660aae5f92025-01-02T01:25:42ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962019-05-01131196208THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURELiliana-Dorina RĂDUCU0PhD, Faculty of Law, 'Nicolae Titulescu' University of Bucharest (e-mail: lilianna.manea@yahoo.com)The principle of legality of the criminal procedure is the established general rule according to which the criminal trial is carried out under the provisions stipulated by the law. In order to fully understand the application of the fundamental principle of legality of the criminal proceeding, it is necessary to clarify, on the one hand, the notion of “criminal procedural law” - a term that does not have a legal definition and, on the other hand, it is necessary to analyze the evolution of the concept referring to the source of criminal procedural law, in the current conventional context, as well as in the context of the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence. Ensuring the application of the criminal process’ lawfulness is firstly achieved by the legislator’s fulfillment of the obligation to clearly regulate the rules of conducting the criminal proceedings and other judicial proceedings in connection with a criminal case. However, the actual reality proves the existence of numerous legal provisions declared unconstitutional, the Constitutional Court’s decisions being binding for both the legislator and the judicial bodies. Thus, the purpose of the research is to identify the consequence of the legislator’s lack of intervention so that the stipulations declared unconstitutional would agree with the Constitution’s provisions if it grants valences of some sources of law to the decisions of the Constitutional Court, if it transforms the Constitutional Court into a positive lawmaker or it just assigns the entire task of guaranteeing of the criminal process’ lawfulness to the judicial bodies. In fact, although the nullity is the main procedural guarantee of the legality of the criminal trial, the consequences of the Constitutional Court’s decisions raise many problems of unitary interpretation and application of the law even in this area, thus questioning the legality of the criminal process.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_027.pdfthe legality of the criminal trialcriminal procedural lawthe effects of the constitutional court’s decisionssources of criminal procedural lawabsolute and relative nullity
spellingShingle Liliana-Dorina RĂDUCU
THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
the legality of the criminal trial
criminal procedural law
the effects of the constitutional court’s decisions
sources of criminal procedural law
absolute and relative nullity
title THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
title_full THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
title_fullStr THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
title_full_unstemmed THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
title_short THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
title_sort legal consequences of the constitutional court s decisions in the context of the legality principle of the criminal procedure
topic the legality of the criminal trial
criminal procedural law
the effects of the constitutional court’s decisions
sources of criminal procedural law
absolute and relative nullity
url http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_027.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lilianadorinaraducu thelegalconsequencesoftheconstitutionalcourtsdecisionsinthecontextofthelegalityprincipleofthecriminalprocedure
AT lilianadorinaraducu legalconsequencesoftheconstitutionalcourtsdecisionsinthecontextofthelegalityprincipleofthecriminalprocedure