Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial

Abstracts: Background: Several traditional dressings may have limitation in treating wounds. A novel chitosan-based dressing designed for improved hemostasis, moisture, and sealing shows promise in wound healing. However, its efficacy and safety are yet to be sufficiently verified in patients. Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dunyong Tan, Jiawei Guo, Xiaoqiang Chen, Jianquan Liu, Siyao Yang, Daping Wang, Wencui Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:JPRAS Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587825000622
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849715166467325952
author Dunyong Tan
Jiawei Guo
Xiaoqiang Chen
Jianquan Liu
Siyao Yang
Daping Wang
Wencui Li
author_facet Dunyong Tan
Jiawei Guo
Xiaoqiang Chen
Jianquan Liu
Siyao Yang
Daping Wang
Wencui Li
author_sort Dunyong Tan
collection DOAJ
description Abstracts: Background: Several traditional dressings may have limitation in treating wounds. A novel chitosan-based dressing designed for improved hemostasis, moisture, and sealing shows promise in wound healing. However, its efficacy and safety are yet to be sufficiently verified in patients. Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 40 patients suffering from acute skin wounds in the limbs from 12/2022 to 12/2023. They were randomly divided into two groups (20 vs. 20) and received regular treatments in the Shenzhen Second People's Hospital. The experimental group was treated with chitosan-based liquid dressing, whereas the control group was treated with traditional dressing with recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF). The therapeutic effects (scar area and pigment deposition), adverse events, visual analogue scale (VAS), healing time, cost, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) were evaluated on days 0, 7, 14, and 28. Results: No adverse events were observed throughout the trial. On day 28, effective rate between groups were not statistically significant between the groups (70% vs. 85%, p = 0.256). Other parameters that were not significant included VAS (5.10 ± 1.62 vs. 6.35 ± 2.39, p = 0.06), healing time (8.45 ± 4.26 vs. 8.60 ± 5.44 days, p = 0.923), and cost (49.00 ± 22.48 vs. 57.40 ± 27.59, p = 0.298). However, on day 28, the patient- and observer-reported SAS of the chitosan (CS) group was significantly lower than that of the rhEGF group (12.00 vs. 9.50, z = 2.477, p = 0.013; 18.50 vs. 12.50, z = 2.209, p = 0.026; respectively), and the total POSAS (30.50 vs. 22.00, z = 2.374, p = 0.017). Conclusion: Compared to rhEGF, the CS-based liquid dressing showed reliable safety and equivalent performance in treating acute limb skin wounds, as revealed by improvements in healing time and rate, pain relief, and costs. Moreover, liquid dressing significantly reduced scar formation, indicating its potential in wound therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-0fca7d344ee1418cbbf704b0f0a4d611
institution DOAJ
issn 2352-5878
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JPRAS Open
spelling doaj-art-0fca7d344ee1418cbbf704b0f0a4d6112025-08-20T03:13:29ZengElsevierJPRAS Open2352-58782025-06-014437938910.1016/j.jpra.2025.03.018Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trialDunyong Tan0Jiawei Guo1Xiaoqiang Chen2Jianquan Liu3Siyao Yang4Daping Wang5Wencui Li6Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shenzhen Second People’ s Hospital (The First Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, ChinaDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shenzhen Second People’ s Hospital (The First Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen 518060, ChinaDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shenzhen Second People’ s Hospital (The First Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, ChinaDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shenzhen Second People’ s Hospital (The First Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, ChinaThe Medical Record Department, Shenzhen Second People’ s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, ChinaDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shenzhen Second People’ s Hospital (The First Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, China; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China; Corresponding author. Daping Wang, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, 3002 Sungang West Road, Shenzhen 518028, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, Tel.: +86-0755-83366388, Fax: +86-0755-83366388.Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shenzhen Second People’ s Hospital (The First Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, China; Wencui Li, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, 3002 Sungang West Road, Shenzhen 518028, Tel.: +86-0755-83366388, Fax: +86-0755-83366388.Abstracts: Background: Several traditional dressings may have limitation in treating wounds. A novel chitosan-based dressing designed for improved hemostasis, moisture, and sealing shows promise in wound healing. However, its efficacy and safety are yet to be sufficiently verified in patients. Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 40 patients suffering from acute skin wounds in the limbs from 12/2022 to 12/2023. They were randomly divided into two groups (20 vs. 20) and received regular treatments in the Shenzhen Second People's Hospital. The experimental group was treated with chitosan-based liquid dressing, whereas the control group was treated with traditional dressing with recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF). The therapeutic effects (scar area and pigment deposition), adverse events, visual analogue scale (VAS), healing time, cost, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) were evaluated on days 0, 7, 14, and 28. Results: No adverse events were observed throughout the trial. On day 28, effective rate between groups were not statistically significant between the groups (70% vs. 85%, p = 0.256). Other parameters that were not significant included VAS (5.10 ± 1.62 vs. 6.35 ± 2.39, p = 0.06), healing time (8.45 ± 4.26 vs. 8.60 ± 5.44 days, p = 0.923), and cost (49.00 ± 22.48 vs. 57.40 ± 27.59, p = 0.298). However, on day 28, the patient- and observer-reported SAS of the chitosan (CS) group was significantly lower than that of the rhEGF group (12.00 vs. 9.50, z = 2.477, p = 0.013; 18.50 vs. 12.50, z = 2.209, p = 0.026; respectively), and the total POSAS (30.50 vs. 22.00, z = 2.374, p = 0.017). Conclusion: Compared to rhEGF, the CS-based liquid dressing showed reliable safety and equivalent performance in treating acute limb skin wounds, as revealed by improvements in healing time and rate, pain relief, and costs. Moreover, liquid dressing significantly reduced scar formation, indicating its potential in wound therapy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587825000622Wound HealingChitosanEGFScar
spellingShingle Dunyong Tan
Jiawei Guo
Xiaoqiang Chen
Jianquan Liu
Siyao Yang
Daping Wang
Wencui Li
Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial
JPRAS Open
Wound Healing
Chitosan
EGF
Scar
title Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative study of chitosan based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing a randomized controlled trial
topic Wound Healing
Chitosan
EGF
Scar
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587825000622
work_keys_str_mv AT dunyongtan comparativestudyofchitosanbasedliquiddressingandrecombinanthumanepidermalgrowthfactoronacutelimbskinwoundhealingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jiaweiguo comparativestudyofchitosanbasedliquiddressingandrecombinanthumanepidermalgrowthfactoronacutelimbskinwoundhealingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiaoqiangchen comparativestudyofchitosanbasedliquiddressingandrecombinanthumanepidermalgrowthfactoronacutelimbskinwoundhealingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jianquanliu comparativestudyofchitosanbasedliquiddressingandrecombinanthumanepidermalgrowthfactoronacutelimbskinwoundhealingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT siyaoyang comparativestudyofchitosanbasedliquiddressingandrecombinanthumanepidermalgrowthfactoronacutelimbskinwoundhealingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dapingwang comparativestudyofchitosanbasedliquiddressingandrecombinanthumanepidermalgrowthfactoronacutelimbskinwoundhealingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wencuili comparativestudyofchitosanbasedliquiddressingandrecombinanthumanepidermalgrowthfactoronacutelimbskinwoundhealingarandomizedcontrolledtrial