Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.

In recent years, there has been a proliferation of new federal investments and policy support for "carbon management" technologies, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), as a strategy to mitigate the United States' greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). The equity implications of deploy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yukyan Lam, Jennifer Ventrella, Ana Isabel Baptista, Juan David Rodriguez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323817
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849328776842838016
author Yukyan Lam
Jennifer Ventrella
Ana Isabel Baptista
Juan David Rodriguez
author_facet Yukyan Lam
Jennifer Ventrella
Ana Isabel Baptista
Juan David Rodriguez
author_sort Yukyan Lam
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, there has been a proliferation of new federal investments and policy support for "carbon management" technologies, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), as a strategy to mitigate the United States' greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). The equity implications of deploying these technologies-particularly their impacts on low-income communities and communities of color, or environmental justice (EJ) communities-have been understudied. A prominent example of this is seen in the US power sector, where CCS has been proposed as a means to mitigate the carbon dioxide emissions of fossil fuel-fired power plants, one of the major sources of GHGs in the country. EJ community leaders alongside some environmental organizations and researchers have voiced deep concerns about how CCS may exacerbate environmental injustice, given that it is itself input-intensive and can prolong the life of polluting fossil fuel infrastructure, which is disproportionately sited in low-income communities and communities of color. To begin to fill the gap in analyses of the equity implications of carbon management, we conducted a spatial analysis of CCS projects proposed for the power sector and their co-location with EJ communities. Compiling a proposed project list from four CCS databases, we found that 33 of the 35 projects were located in EJ communities, and that additionally, 423 of the 497 (or 85%) EJ census block groups located within three miles of at least one proposed project currently face heightened environmental stress. These results illustrate both the feasibility and the necessity of analyzing the co-location of proposed CCS buildout in EJ communities, and add to the nascent body of literature evaluating the impacts of carbon management technologies such as CCS on these communities.
format Article
id doaj-art-0f981f16945349e9a1601d7fa416ad7e
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-0f981f16945349e9a1601d7fa416ad7e2025-08-20T03:47:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01205e032381710.1371/journal.pone.0323817Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.Yukyan LamJennifer VentrellaAna Isabel BaptistaJuan David RodriguezIn recent years, there has been a proliferation of new federal investments and policy support for "carbon management" technologies, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), as a strategy to mitigate the United States' greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). The equity implications of deploying these technologies-particularly their impacts on low-income communities and communities of color, or environmental justice (EJ) communities-have been understudied. A prominent example of this is seen in the US power sector, where CCS has been proposed as a means to mitigate the carbon dioxide emissions of fossil fuel-fired power plants, one of the major sources of GHGs in the country. EJ community leaders alongside some environmental organizations and researchers have voiced deep concerns about how CCS may exacerbate environmental injustice, given that it is itself input-intensive and can prolong the life of polluting fossil fuel infrastructure, which is disproportionately sited in low-income communities and communities of color. To begin to fill the gap in analyses of the equity implications of carbon management, we conducted a spatial analysis of CCS projects proposed for the power sector and their co-location with EJ communities. Compiling a proposed project list from four CCS databases, we found that 33 of the 35 projects were located in EJ communities, and that additionally, 423 of the 497 (or 85%) EJ census block groups located within three miles of at least one proposed project currently face heightened environmental stress. These results illustrate both the feasibility and the necessity of analyzing the co-location of proposed CCS buildout in EJ communities, and add to the nascent body of literature evaluating the impacts of carbon management technologies such as CCS on these communities.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323817
spellingShingle Yukyan Lam
Jennifer Ventrella
Ana Isabel Baptista
Juan David Rodriguez
Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.
PLoS ONE
title Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.
title_full Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.
title_fullStr Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.
title_short Analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the US power sector and co-location with environmental justice communities.
title_sort analysis of proposed carbon capture projects in the us power sector and co location with environmental justice communities
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323817
work_keys_str_mv AT yukyanlam analysisofproposedcarboncaptureprojectsintheuspowersectorandcolocationwithenvironmentaljusticecommunities
AT jenniferventrella analysisofproposedcarboncaptureprojectsintheuspowersectorandcolocationwithenvironmentaljusticecommunities
AT anaisabelbaptista analysisofproposedcarboncaptureprojectsintheuspowersectorandcolocationwithenvironmentaljusticecommunities
AT juandavidrodriguez analysisofproposedcarboncaptureprojectsintheuspowersectorandcolocationwithenvironmentaljusticecommunities