Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning.
With growing uncertainty in global trade, improving access to domestic capital markets has become an important way to manage financial risk spillovers. This study examines how the registration system reform affects the finance sector's risk spillovers to other 10 sectors in China's stock m...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326607 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849329459723763712 |
|---|---|
| author | Yuxi Zhang Weidong Li Shijun Dong |
| author_facet | Yuxi Zhang Weidong Li Shijun Dong |
| author_sort | Yuxi Zhang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | With growing uncertainty in global trade, improving access to domestic capital markets has become an important way to manage financial risk spillovers. This study examines how the registration system reform affects the finance sector's risk spillovers to other 10 sectors in China's stock market using a dual machine learning model. The findings include: (1) The finance sector's risk spillovers vary over time and are heterogeneous. Risk spillovers rapidly intensify two months after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the average net ∆CoVaR value changing from -0.001 to -0.006. The finance sector mainly accepts risk from the public utility sector and exports risk to the other 9 sectors, with the highest spillovers going to the communication and information technology sectors, showing extreme net ΔCoVaR values around -0.02. (2) The registration system reform increases the finance sector's risk spillover effect, and this conclusion remains the same after a series of robustness tests. (3) Sector heterogeneity tests show that the reform boosts the finance sector's risk spillovers to cyclical sectors and sectors with a low proportion of strategic emerging companies but reduces risk spillovers to midstream and supportive sectors. Finally, some suggestions and implications are proposed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0f92f9ec58154ea1adf3e08c2ad1bac2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-0f92f9ec58154ea1adf3e08c2ad1bac22025-08-20T03:47:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01206e032660710.1371/journal.pone.0326607Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning.Yuxi ZhangWeidong LiShijun DongWith growing uncertainty in global trade, improving access to domestic capital markets has become an important way to manage financial risk spillovers. This study examines how the registration system reform affects the finance sector's risk spillovers to other 10 sectors in China's stock market using a dual machine learning model. The findings include: (1) The finance sector's risk spillovers vary over time and are heterogeneous. Risk spillovers rapidly intensify two months after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the average net ∆CoVaR value changing from -0.001 to -0.006. The finance sector mainly accepts risk from the public utility sector and exports risk to the other 9 sectors, with the highest spillovers going to the communication and information technology sectors, showing extreme net ΔCoVaR values around -0.02. (2) The registration system reform increases the finance sector's risk spillover effect, and this conclusion remains the same after a series of robustness tests. (3) Sector heterogeneity tests show that the reform boosts the finance sector's risk spillovers to cyclical sectors and sectors with a low proportion of strategic emerging companies but reduces risk spillovers to midstream and supportive sectors. Finally, some suggestions and implications are proposed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326607 |
| spellingShingle | Yuxi Zhang Weidong Li Shijun Dong Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning. PLoS ONE |
| title | Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning. |
| title_full | Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning. |
| title_fullStr | Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning. |
| title_short | Does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector's risk spillover effect in China's stock market-Causal inference based on dual machine learning. |
| title_sort | does the registration system reform reduce the finance sector s risk spillover effect in china s stock market causal inference based on dual machine learning |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326607 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yuxizhang doestheregistrationsystemreformreducethefinancesectorsriskspillovereffectinchinasstockmarketcausalinferencebasedondualmachinelearning AT weidongli doestheregistrationsystemreformreducethefinancesectorsriskspillovereffectinchinasstockmarketcausalinferencebasedondualmachinelearning AT shijundong doestheregistrationsystemreformreducethefinancesectorsriskspillovereffectinchinasstockmarketcausalinferencebasedondualmachinelearning |