Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storage

Energy supply has become a critical global concern. Due to its low cost and high heating value (HV), natural gas is a leading energy source. However, its consumption fluctuates throughout the year due to varying heating demands in different weather conditions, with significantly more usage during co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Behnam Sedaee, Zahra Almahmoodi, Mostafa Gilavand, Mahdi Kanaani, Mahnaz Mansouri, Yousef Fathi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Results in Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025014148
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850151564222660608
author Behnam Sedaee
Zahra Almahmoodi
Mostafa Gilavand
Mahdi Kanaani
Mahnaz Mansouri
Yousef Fathi
author_facet Behnam Sedaee
Zahra Almahmoodi
Mostafa Gilavand
Mahdi Kanaani
Mahnaz Mansouri
Yousef Fathi
author_sort Behnam Sedaee
collection DOAJ
description Energy supply has become a critical global concern. Due to its low cost and high heating value (HV), natural gas is a leading energy source. However, its consumption fluctuates throughout the year due to varying heating demands in different weather conditions, with significantly more usage during colder seasons. Underground natural gas storage (UNGS) addresses this variability. UNGS requires cushion gas to maintain reservoir pressure, enabling gas production. Cushion gas usually constitutes 15–75 % of total stored gas, making it costly. Replacing cushion gas is a promising approach to reduce operational costs. This study numerically simulates underground gas storage in a naturally fractured aquifer. It investigates carbon dioxide and nitrogen as potential cushion gas replacements. Various flow scenarios were modeled, and performance was evaluated based on gas recovery, unwanted water production, and produced gas quality. The study focuses on natural gas storage in the Yourtsha aquifer and explores the technical and economic feasibility of using inert gases as substitutes. Results show that carbon dioxide outperforms nitrogen as a cushion gas without accounting for gas dissolution in water. However, when nitrogen dissolution is considered, nitrogen shows higher potential. Including gas dissolution effects also indicates that inert gases perform better than natural gas in displacing fluids and maintaining pressure during storage operations. Furthermore, comparing cumulative injection and production volumes in scenarios with and without gas mixing revealed that mixing negatively impacts storage operation quality. Water production increased in the base scenario due to mixing, adversely affecting seasonal gas injection and production. In scenarios using inert cushion gases, the presence of multiple gas components intensified the mixing phenomenon, resulting in higher water production from gas wells.
format Article
id doaj-art-0f7199cfbda2403b8246fef9e8c71eb2
institution OA Journals
issn 2590-1230
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Results in Engineering
spelling doaj-art-0f7199cfbda2403b8246fef9e8c71eb22025-08-20T02:26:11ZengElsevierResults in Engineering2590-12302025-06-012610534410.1016/j.rineng.2025.105344Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storageBehnam Sedaee0Zahra Almahmoodi1Mostafa Gilavand2Mahdi Kanaani3Mahnaz Mansouri4Yousef Fathi5Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran; The core of the Research Center for Underground Hydrogen Storage, University of Tehran, Iran; Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Corresponding author.Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran; The core of the Research Center for Underground Hydrogen Storage, University of Tehran, IranInstitute of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran; The core of the Research Center for Underground Hydrogen Storage, University of Tehran, IranInstitute of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran; The core of the Research Center for Underground Hydrogen Storage, University of Tehran, IranGas Engineering and Development Company, Tehran, IranDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USAEnergy supply has become a critical global concern. Due to its low cost and high heating value (HV), natural gas is a leading energy source. However, its consumption fluctuates throughout the year due to varying heating demands in different weather conditions, with significantly more usage during colder seasons. Underground natural gas storage (UNGS) addresses this variability. UNGS requires cushion gas to maintain reservoir pressure, enabling gas production. Cushion gas usually constitutes 15–75 % of total stored gas, making it costly. Replacing cushion gas is a promising approach to reduce operational costs. This study numerically simulates underground gas storage in a naturally fractured aquifer. It investigates carbon dioxide and nitrogen as potential cushion gas replacements. Various flow scenarios were modeled, and performance was evaluated based on gas recovery, unwanted water production, and produced gas quality. The study focuses on natural gas storage in the Yourtsha aquifer and explores the technical and economic feasibility of using inert gases as substitutes. Results show that carbon dioxide outperforms nitrogen as a cushion gas without accounting for gas dissolution in water. However, when nitrogen dissolution is considered, nitrogen shows higher potential. Including gas dissolution effects also indicates that inert gases perform better than natural gas in displacing fluids and maintaining pressure during storage operations. Furthermore, comparing cumulative injection and production volumes in scenarios with and without gas mixing revealed that mixing negatively impacts storage operation quality. Water production increased in the base scenario due to mixing, adversely affecting seasonal gas injection and production. In scenarios using inert cushion gases, the presence of multiple gas components intensified the mixing phenomenon, resulting in higher water production from gas wells.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025014148Underground Gas Storage (UGS)Cushion GasNitrogenCarbon dioxideAquiferFractured
spellingShingle Behnam Sedaee
Zahra Almahmoodi
Mostafa Gilavand
Mahdi Kanaani
Mahnaz Mansouri
Yousef Fathi
Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storage
Results in Engineering
Underground Gas Storage (UGS)
Cushion Gas
Nitrogen
Carbon dioxide
Aquifer
Fractured
title Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storage
title_full Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storage
title_fullStr Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storage
title_full_unstemmed Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storage
title_short Cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer: Cushion gas strategies for matrix-independent storage
title_sort cushion gas replacement on underground gas storage in a naturally fracture aquifer cushion gas strategies for matrix independent storage
topic Underground Gas Storage (UGS)
Cushion Gas
Nitrogen
Carbon dioxide
Aquifer
Fractured
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025014148
work_keys_str_mv AT behnamsedaee cushiongasreplacementonundergroundgasstorageinanaturallyfractureaquifercushiongasstrategiesformatrixindependentstorage
AT zahraalmahmoodi cushiongasreplacementonundergroundgasstorageinanaturallyfractureaquifercushiongasstrategiesformatrixindependentstorage
AT mostafagilavand cushiongasreplacementonundergroundgasstorageinanaturallyfractureaquifercushiongasstrategiesformatrixindependentstorage
AT mahdikanaani cushiongasreplacementonundergroundgasstorageinanaturallyfractureaquifercushiongasstrategiesformatrixindependentstorage
AT mahnazmansouri cushiongasreplacementonundergroundgasstorageinanaturallyfractureaquifercushiongasstrategiesformatrixindependentstorage
AT youseffathi cushiongasreplacementonundergroundgasstorageinanaturallyfractureaquifercushiongasstrategiesformatrixindependentstorage