Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model
Background: This study assessed the implementation of the Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) program in Cebu using the Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model. The evaluation compared the actual program implementation with the ideal parameters set by the World Health Organization (WHO) CBR standards,...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Center for Policy, Research and Development Studies
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rmrj.usjr.edu.ph/rmrj/index.php/RMRJ/article/view/2749 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849764408835702784 |
|---|---|
| author | Ulysses Cutamora Giovanni Leonardo Maria Menierva Lagria |
| author_facet | Ulysses Cutamora Giovanni Leonardo Maria Menierva Lagria |
| author_sort | Ulysses Cutamora |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: This study assessed the implementation of the Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) program in Cebu using the Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model. The evaluation compared the actual program implementation with the ideal parameters set by the World Health Organization (WHO) CBR standards, identifying discrepancies.
Methods: A quantitative descriptive-evaluative research design was employed, with two respondent groups: program implementers and program clients, ensuring data triangulation. Data were gathered through one-on-one interviews, using WHO’s 2004 standardized guidelines and indicators from the International Disability and Development Consortium (IDDC) as the evaluation framework. Key components assessed included health, education, livelihood, empowerment, and social aspects.
Results: The study identified discrepancies across these five CBR components, primarily attributed to limited resources and expertise available for service delivery. In the Philippine context, most indicators under health and education were effectively implemented, successfully enhancing the lives of persons with disabilities and their families. However, the livelihood, empowerment, and social components showed significant gaps, with several indicators or services yet to be fully implemented.
Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for resource allocation and capacity-building to improve these critical areas of the CBR program. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0f491dfeb89d49e18a7716b7619ef6c2 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2423-1398 2408-3755 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Center for Policy, Research and Development Studies |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-0f491dfeb89d49e18a7716b7619ef6c22025-08-20T03:05:09ZengCenter for Policy, Research and Development StudiesRecoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal2423-13982408-37552025-04-011Special Issue11910.32871/rmrj25si.t2416Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation ModelUlysses Cutamora0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-5905Giovanni Leonardo1https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1159-7132Maria Menierva Lagria2https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4751-3318Velez College, Cebu City, PhilippinesVelez College, Cebu City, PhilippinesVelez College, Cebu City, PhilippinesBackground: This study assessed the implementation of the Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) program in Cebu using the Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model. The evaluation compared the actual program implementation with the ideal parameters set by the World Health Organization (WHO) CBR standards, identifying discrepancies. Methods: A quantitative descriptive-evaluative research design was employed, with two respondent groups: program implementers and program clients, ensuring data triangulation. Data were gathered through one-on-one interviews, using WHO’s 2004 standardized guidelines and indicators from the International Disability and Development Consortium (IDDC) as the evaluation framework. Key components assessed included health, education, livelihood, empowerment, and social aspects. Results: The study identified discrepancies across these five CBR components, primarily attributed to limited resources and expertise available for service delivery. In the Philippine context, most indicators under health and education were effectively implemented, successfully enhancing the lives of persons with disabilities and their families. However, the livelihood, empowerment, and social components showed significant gaps, with several indicators or services yet to be fully implemented. Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for resource allocation and capacity-building to improve these critical areas of the CBR program.https://rmrj.usjr.edu.ph/rmrj/index.php/RMRJ/article/view/2749program evaluationcommunity-based rehabilitationprovus discrepancy evaluation modelcommunity healthcebu philippines |
| spellingShingle | Ulysses Cutamora Giovanni Leonardo Maria Menierva Lagria Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal program evaluation community-based rehabilitation provus discrepancy evaluation model community health cebu philippines |
| title | Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model |
| title_full | Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model |
| title_short | Evaluating a Community-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Provus Discrepancy Evaluation Model |
| title_sort | evaluating a community based rehabilitation program using provus discrepancy evaluation model |
| topic | program evaluation community-based rehabilitation provus discrepancy evaluation model community health cebu philippines |
| url | https://rmrj.usjr.edu.ph/rmrj/index.php/RMRJ/article/view/2749 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ulyssescutamora evaluatingacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogramusingprovusdiscrepancyevaluationmodel AT giovannileonardo evaluatingacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogramusingprovusdiscrepancyevaluationmodel AT mariameniervalagria evaluatingacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogramusingprovusdiscrepancyevaluationmodel |