How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?

ABSTRACT Species' future distributions are commonly predicted using models that link the likelihood of occurrence of individuals to the environment. Although animals' movements are influenced by physical and non‐physical landscapes, for example related to individual experiences such as spa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romain Dejeante, Rémi Lemaire‐Patin, Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70782
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582998177873920
author Romain Dejeante
Rémi Lemaire‐Patin
Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes
author_facet Romain Dejeante
Rémi Lemaire‐Patin
Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes
author_sort Romain Dejeante
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Species' future distributions are commonly predicted using models that link the likelihood of occurrence of individuals to the environment. Although animals' movements are influenced by physical and non‐physical landscapes, for example related to individual experiences such as space familiarity or previous encounters with conspecifics, species distribution models developed from observations of unknown individuals cannot integrate these latter variables, turning them into ‘invisible landscapes’. In this theoretical study, we address how overlooking ‘invisible landscapes’ impacts the estimation of habitat selection and thereby the projection of future distributions. Overlooking the attraction towards some ‘invisible’ variable consistently led to overestimating the strength of habitat selection. Consequently, projections of future population distributions were also biased, with animals following changes in preferred habitat less than predicted. Our results reveal an overlooked challenge faced by correlative species distribution models based on the observation of unknown individuals, whose past experience of the environment is by definition not known. Mechanistic distribution modeling integrating cognitive processes underlying movement should be developed.
format Article
id doaj-art-0f328af186cb403ea8572f393f8ac871
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-0f328af186cb403ea8572f393f8ac8712025-01-29T05:08:41ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582025-01-01151n/an/a10.1002/ece3.70782How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?Romain Dejeante0Rémi Lemaire‐Patin1Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes2CEFE Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier FranceISPA Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE Villenave d'Ornon FranceCEFE Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier FranceABSTRACT Species' future distributions are commonly predicted using models that link the likelihood of occurrence of individuals to the environment. Although animals' movements are influenced by physical and non‐physical landscapes, for example related to individual experiences such as space familiarity or previous encounters with conspecifics, species distribution models developed from observations of unknown individuals cannot integrate these latter variables, turning them into ‘invisible landscapes’. In this theoretical study, we address how overlooking ‘invisible landscapes’ impacts the estimation of habitat selection and thereby the projection of future distributions. Overlooking the attraction towards some ‘invisible’ variable consistently led to overestimating the strength of habitat selection. Consequently, projections of future population distributions were also biased, with animals following changes in preferred habitat less than predicted. Our results reveal an overlooked challenge faced by correlative species distribution models based on the observation of unknown individuals, whose past experience of the environment is by definition not known. Mechanistic distribution modeling integrating cognitive processes underlying movement should be developed.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70782habitat selectionRSFSDMsocial environmentspatial memoryspecies distribution
spellingShingle Romain Dejeante
Rémi Lemaire‐Patin
Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes
How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?
Ecology and Evolution
habitat selection
RSF
SDM
social environment
spatial memory
species distribution
title How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?
title_full How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?
title_fullStr How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?
title_full_unstemmed How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?
title_short How Can Overlooking Social Interactions, Space Familiarity or Other “Invisible Landscapes” Shaping Animal Movement Bias Habitat Selection Estimations and Species Distribution Predictions?
title_sort how can overlooking social interactions space familiarity or other invisible landscapes shaping animal movement bias habitat selection estimations and species distribution predictions
topic habitat selection
RSF
SDM
social environment
spatial memory
species distribution
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70782
work_keys_str_mv AT romaindejeante howcanoverlookingsocialinteractionsspacefamiliarityorotherinvisiblelandscapesshapinganimalmovementbiashabitatselectionestimationsandspeciesdistributionpredictions
AT remilemairepatin howcanoverlookingsocialinteractionsspacefamiliarityorotherinvisiblelandscapesshapinganimalmovementbiashabitatselectionestimationsandspeciesdistributionpredictions
AT simonchamaillejammes howcanoverlookingsocialinteractionsspacefamiliarityorotherinvisiblelandscapesshapinganimalmovementbiashabitatselectionestimationsandspeciesdistributionpredictions