Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP Jacketing

This paper presents the experimental investigation of the load-resisting characteristics of damaged columns repaired with glass reinforced polymer (GFRP) jacketing. The high-strength columns were made with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) used at 15%, 25%, and 35% as a partial substitute...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. I. Gunarani, B. Karthikeyan, A. Priyadharshini, Senthil Kumaran Selvaraj, S Jose, D. Vincent Herald Wilson, Tezeta Moges Adane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6716511
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850235067228487680
author G. I. Gunarani
B. Karthikeyan
A. Priyadharshini
Senthil Kumaran Selvaraj
S Jose
D. Vincent Herald Wilson
Tezeta Moges Adane
author_facet G. I. Gunarani
B. Karthikeyan
A. Priyadharshini
Senthil Kumaran Selvaraj
S Jose
D. Vincent Herald Wilson
Tezeta Moges Adane
author_sort G. I. Gunarani
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents the experimental investigation of the load-resisting characteristics of damaged columns repaired with glass reinforced polymer (GFRP) jacketing. The high-strength columns were made with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) used at 15%, 25%, and 35% as a partial substitute for cement. Cube specimens of size 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm and columns of size 600 mm × 120 mm were cast to perform the study. Considering the practical difficulties in the construction field in obtaining river sand, industrial sand was used for making the specimens eco-friendly. On completion of the prescribed curing period of 28 days, the cube specimens were subjected to a compression test to ensure the grade of the mix design, and the column specimens were subjected to axial loading and were tested in two categories, with and without wrapping of GFRP sheets’ split tensile strength. Compression tests on cubes and columns were done. The nondestructive test was also performed with the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) method to check the dense nature of the concrete before and after wrapping with GFRP. On comparing the results, it was observed that it is possible to obtain a higher strength using industrial sand when supported with suitable admixtures and strengthening processes.
format Article
id doaj-art-0f2369b5128c41ebbe5146ae98d547b6
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-0f2369b5128c41ebbe5146ae98d547b62025-08-20T02:02:25ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6716511Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP JacketingG. I. Gunarani0B. Karthikeyan1A. Priyadharshini2Senthil Kumaran Selvaraj3S Jose4D. Vincent Herald Wilson5Tezeta Moges Adane6SASTRA Deemed to be UniversitySASTRA Deemed to be UniversitySASTRA Deemed to be UniversityDepartment of Manufacturing EngineeringSchool of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC)School of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC)School of Civil EngineeringThis paper presents the experimental investigation of the load-resisting characteristics of damaged columns repaired with glass reinforced polymer (GFRP) jacketing. The high-strength columns were made with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) used at 15%, 25%, and 35% as a partial substitute for cement. Cube specimens of size 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm and columns of size 600 mm × 120 mm were cast to perform the study. Considering the practical difficulties in the construction field in obtaining river sand, industrial sand was used for making the specimens eco-friendly. On completion of the prescribed curing period of 28 days, the cube specimens were subjected to a compression test to ensure the grade of the mix design, and the column specimens were subjected to axial loading and were tested in two categories, with and without wrapping of GFRP sheets’ split tensile strength. Compression tests on cubes and columns were done. The nondestructive test was also performed with the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) method to check the dense nature of the concrete before and after wrapping with GFRP. On comparing the results, it was observed that it is possible to obtain a higher strength using industrial sand when supported with suitable admixtures and strengthening processes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6716511
spellingShingle G. I. Gunarani
B. Karthikeyan
A. Priyadharshini
Senthil Kumaran Selvaraj
S Jose
D. Vincent Herald Wilson
Tezeta Moges Adane
Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP Jacketing
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP Jacketing
title_full Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP Jacketing
title_fullStr Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP Jacketing
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP Jacketing
title_short Sustainable Concrete Columns with GGBS and Industrial Sand: A Comparative Study on Destructive and Nondestructive Tests on Damaged Columns Strengthened with GFRP Jacketing
title_sort sustainable concrete columns with ggbs and industrial sand a comparative study on destructive and nondestructive tests on damaged columns strengthened with gfrp jacketing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6716511
work_keys_str_mv AT gigunarani sustainableconcretecolumnswithggbsandindustrialsandacomparativestudyondestructiveandnondestructivetestsondamagedcolumnsstrengthenedwithgfrpjacketing
AT bkarthikeyan sustainableconcretecolumnswithggbsandindustrialsandacomparativestudyondestructiveandnondestructivetestsondamagedcolumnsstrengthenedwithgfrpjacketing
AT apriyadharshini sustainableconcretecolumnswithggbsandindustrialsandacomparativestudyondestructiveandnondestructivetestsondamagedcolumnsstrengthenedwithgfrpjacketing
AT senthilkumaranselvaraj sustainableconcretecolumnswithggbsandindustrialsandacomparativestudyondestructiveandnondestructivetestsondamagedcolumnsstrengthenedwithgfrpjacketing
AT sjose sustainableconcretecolumnswithggbsandindustrialsandacomparativestudyondestructiveandnondestructivetestsondamagedcolumnsstrengthenedwithgfrpjacketing
AT dvincentheraldwilson sustainableconcretecolumnswithggbsandindustrialsandacomparativestudyondestructiveandnondestructivetestsondamagedcolumnsstrengthenedwithgfrpjacketing
AT tezetamogesadane sustainableconcretecolumnswithggbsandindustrialsandacomparativestudyondestructiveandnondestructivetestsondamagedcolumnsstrengthenedwithgfrpjacketing