Philosophical or Empirical Incommensurability of Frequentist Versus Bayesian Thinking
Frequentists and Bayesians disagree about the soundness of performing calculations based, in an important part, on prior information. The disagreement goes back to a basic philosophical disagreement about how to conceptualize the meaning of probability. As frequentists and Bayesians use the term dif...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | David Trafimow |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Ekonometria |
| Online Access: | https://journals.ue.wroc.pl/eada/article/view/939 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
COMPARISON OF FREQUENTIST AND BAYESIAN APPROACHES ON SAMPLE SIZE: METHODOLOGIC STUDY
by: Cennet Yıldız, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Comparing Frequentist and Bayesian Methods for Factorial Invariance with Latent Distribution Heterogeneity
by: Xinya Liang, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Bayesian-frequentist hybrid inference framework for single cell RNA-seq analyses
by: Gang Han, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Decision Rules in Frequentist and Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: P-Value and Bayes Factor
by: Mario Fordellone, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
PARAMETER ESTIMATION OF LOGNORMAL AND PARETO TYPE I DISTRIBUTIONS USING FREQUENTIST AND BAYESIAN INFERENCES
by: Jenisha Then, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)