The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and use
Background: Monitoring and evaluation (ME) is not only a managerial tool and apolitical process, but it is also a political tool serving political objectives. In Western Uganda, government and non-governmental conservation organisations monitor and evaluate Community-Based Natural Resources Manageme...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
AOSIS
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | African Evaluation Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/792 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849768629020655616 |
|---|---|
| author | Ismael Ochen-Ochen |
| author_facet | Ismael Ochen-Ochen |
| author_sort | Ismael Ochen-Ochen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Monitoring and evaluation (ME) is not only a managerial tool and apolitical process, but it is also a political tool serving political objectives. In Western Uganda, government and non-governmental conservation organisations monitor and evaluate Community-Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM) projects in protected areas (PAs) and adjacent communities. However, politics of ME influences how performance evidence is generated and used.
Objectives: This article explores the inevitable politics of ME and their implications for evidence generation and use.
Method: The research was conducted in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Lake Mburo National Park and the Rwenzori Mountains National Park in Western Uganda and neighbouring communities. It involved Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) and three non-governmental conservation organisations supporting CBNRM in PAs and neighboring communities in Western Uganda. A qualitative research approach was applied using ethnographic research strategy. Data were collected through in-depth and informal interviews of conservation organisations’ staff, local leaders and communities, document analysis and participant observation.
Results: This study finds that ME is aligned to generate performance evidence donors require, with little use locally. ME politics determines the evidence generated, aligned to powerful interest and donor information needs. Political leaders demand participation in monitoring projects for political capital by demonstrating their commitment to electorate.
Conclusion: Dealing with ME politics requires acknowledging its positive and negative implications and leveraging existing opportunities to achieve ME objectives.
Contribution: This paper highlights how to deal with politics of ME and underscores designing and conducting ME as a technical and political process. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0f04fcadb33d44c0b583ed901ca85574 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2310-4988 2306-5133 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | AOSIS |
| record_format | Article |
| series | African Evaluation Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-0f04fcadb33d44c0b583ed901ca855742025-08-20T03:03:44ZengAOSISAfrican Evaluation Journal2310-49882306-51332025-03-01131e1e910.4102/aej.v13i1.792227The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and useIsmael Ochen-Ochen0Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, JohannesburgBackground: Monitoring and evaluation (ME) is not only a managerial tool and apolitical process, but it is also a political tool serving political objectives. In Western Uganda, government and non-governmental conservation organisations monitor and evaluate Community-Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM) projects in protected areas (PAs) and adjacent communities. However, politics of ME influences how performance evidence is generated and used. Objectives: This article explores the inevitable politics of ME and their implications for evidence generation and use. Method: The research was conducted in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Lake Mburo National Park and the Rwenzori Mountains National Park in Western Uganda and neighbouring communities. It involved Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) and three non-governmental conservation organisations supporting CBNRM in PAs and neighboring communities in Western Uganda. A qualitative research approach was applied using ethnographic research strategy. Data were collected through in-depth and informal interviews of conservation organisations’ staff, local leaders and communities, document analysis and participant observation. Results: This study finds that ME is aligned to generate performance evidence donors require, with little use locally. ME politics determines the evidence generated, aligned to powerful interest and donor information needs. Political leaders demand participation in monitoring projects for political capital by demonstrating their commitment to electorate. Conclusion: Dealing with ME politics requires acknowledging its positive and negative implications and leveraging existing opportunities to achieve ME objectives. Contribution: This paper highlights how to deal with politics of ME and underscores designing and conducting ME as a technical and political process.https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/792monitoringevaluationpoliticsmonitoring and evaluationcommunity-based natural resources management. |
| spellingShingle | Ismael Ochen-Ochen The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and use African Evaluation Journal monitoring evaluation politics monitoring and evaluation community-based natural resources management. |
| title | The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and use |
| title_full | The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and use |
| title_fullStr | The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and use |
| title_full_unstemmed | The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and use |
| title_short | The politics of monitoring and evaluation: Implications for evidence generation and use |
| title_sort | politics of monitoring and evaluation implications for evidence generation and use |
| topic | monitoring evaluation politics monitoring and evaluation community-based natural resources management. |
| url | https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/792 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ismaelochenochen thepoliticsofmonitoringandevaluationimplicationsforevidencegenerationanduse AT ismaelochenochen politicsofmonitoringandevaluationimplicationsforevidencegenerationanduse |