Un supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-Unis

Drawing on fieldwork combining interviews and analysis of court documents, this article studies the “evidentiary work” carried out by attorneys and experts involved in the current litigation over judicial executions by lethal injection in the USA. This execution method is supposed to kill the condem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolas Fischer
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: ENS Éditions 2025-05-01
Series:Tracés
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/traces/16424
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849733259154423808
author Nicolas Fischer
author_facet Nicolas Fischer
author_sort Nicolas Fischer
collection DOAJ
description Drawing on fieldwork combining interviews and analysis of court documents, this article studies the “evidentiary work” carried out by attorneys and experts involved in the current litigation over judicial executions by lethal injection in the USA. This execution method is supposed to kill the condemned “humanely” by anaesthetising them before injecting them with a lethal substance. Yet, it has been the subject of legal complaints since the early 2000s. These complaints claim that lethal injection, far from being humane, inflicts extreme and unconstitutional pain on those executed. Producing evidence of this pain, however, proves to be particularly difficult: inmates receiving injections are indeed inert and apparently unconscious, and only medical experts can detect any suffering they might be experiencing. First, the paper summarises the context of the emergence of this litigation centred on lethal injection. I then move on to analyse the “evidentiary work” involved in a particular trial held in Oklahoma City (Oklahoma) in early 2022. It focuses on the confrontation between anesthesiology expert witnesses in court and on their supporting repertoire of evidence, which includes data collected by sensors placed on the bodies of condemned prisoners, as well as their observations of executions they were allowed to witness. Despite a high level of technicality, their expertise nevertheless fails to make tangible what constitutes its main object: the degree of consciousness, and therefore of pain sensitivity, that condemned prisoners retain while they are being executed.
format Article
id doaj-art-0ef2e7649b0a428191f0a2ce9839438f
institution DOAJ
issn 1763-0061
1963-1812
language fra
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher ENS Éditions
record_format Article
series Tracés
spelling doaj-art-0ef2e7649b0a428191f0a2ce9839438f2025-08-20T03:08:06ZfraENS ÉditionsTracés1763-00611963-18122025-05-0146214010.4000/13wwnUn supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-UnisNicolas FischerDrawing on fieldwork combining interviews and analysis of court documents, this article studies the “evidentiary work” carried out by attorneys and experts involved in the current litigation over judicial executions by lethal injection in the USA. This execution method is supposed to kill the condemned “humanely” by anaesthetising them before injecting them with a lethal substance. Yet, it has been the subject of legal complaints since the early 2000s. These complaints claim that lethal injection, far from being humane, inflicts extreme and unconstitutional pain on those executed. Producing evidence of this pain, however, proves to be particularly difficult: inmates receiving injections are indeed inert and apparently unconscious, and only medical experts can detect any suffering they might be experiencing. First, the paper summarises the context of the emergence of this litigation centred on lethal injection. I then move on to analyse the “evidentiary work” involved in a particular trial held in Oklahoma City (Oklahoma) in early 2022. It focuses on the confrontation between anesthesiology expert witnesses in court and on their supporting repertoire of evidence, which includes data collected by sensors placed on the bodies of condemned prisoners, as well as their observations of executions they were allowed to witness. Despite a high level of technicality, their expertise nevertheless fails to make tangible what constitutes its main object: the degree of consciousness, and therefore of pain sensitivity, that condemned prisoners retain while they are being executed.https://journals.openedition.org/traces/16424evidenceexpertisejusticecapital punishmentmedicine
spellingShingle Nicolas Fischer
Un supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-Unis
Tracés
evidence
expertise
justice
capital punishment
medicine
title Un supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-Unis
title_full Un supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-Unis
title_fullStr Un supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-Unis
title_full_unstemmed Un supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-Unis
title_short Un supplice imperceptible. Prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnés à mort dans les procès de l’injection létale aux États-Unis
title_sort un supplice imperceptible prouver la douleur ressentie par les condamnes a mort dans les proces de l injection letale aux etats unis
topic evidence
expertise
justice
capital punishment
medicine
url https://journals.openedition.org/traces/16424
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasfischer unsuppliceimperceptibleprouverladouleurressentieparlescondamnesamortdanslesprocesdelinjectionletaleauxetatsunis