Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps

The article aims to discuss the practical problems and inconsistencies of industrial policy in Russia since 2000, to analyze positive and negative experiences, and to draw up some lessons which are essential for a new technology-industrial policy. The evolution of approaches to industrial policy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuri Simachev, Mikhail Kuzyk, Boris Kuznetsov, Evgeniy Pogrebnyak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Research University Higher School of Economics 2014-12-01
Series:Foresight and STI Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/19369
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849252054684401664
author Yuri Simachev
Mikhail Kuzyk
Boris Kuznetsov
Evgeniy Pogrebnyak
author_facet Yuri Simachev
Mikhail Kuzyk
Boris Kuznetsov
Evgeniy Pogrebnyak
author_sort Yuri Simachev
collection DOAJ
description The article aims to discuss the practical problems and inconsistencies of industrial policy in Russia since 2000, to analyze positive and negative experiences, and to draw up some lessons which are essential for a new technology-industrial policy. The evolution of approaches to industrial policy in Russia is considered, which results particularly in convergence between innovation and industrial policies. Basic state interest groups are revealed, whose interaction determines the industrial policy design. The authors compare two recent significant industrial policies: in automotive industry and nanoindustry. On this basis, we highlight some prerequisites for successful policies. The following main lessons are drawn: First, global experience shows that the requirements for industrial policy and its opportunities change significantly with time. Such policies in any given country and at any particular point of time need new ideas and solutions; it is extremely difficult to replicate the success of different countries’ industrial policies. Second, examples of successful industrial policy typically aim to enter a foreign market, become globally competitive, and attract foreign investment. The implementation of industrial policy without definite and sufficient conditions for the free entry and exit of major players and without the participation of foreign partners is doomed to merely simulate progress, to have strong informational asymmetry, and to create antagonist images of what is actually happening in the economy in the eyes of the society and the public authorities. Third, the problem of correctly assessing the scientific and technological potential is of great importance for implementing technological-industrial policy.  Numerous assessments appear to be unreliable since they do not take into account changes in business demand for technology. The tendency to use the legacy of past decades sometimes becomes a political problem, blocking new approaches and the development of international technology co-operation. Fourth, a negative attitude towards particular policies should not be regarded as a ‘taboo’ against studying related issues. Due to the fact that for a long time in Russia it has been as if ‘there were no kind of industrial policy’, the country now has a low quality of both industrial policy and  research.
format Article
id doaj-art-0ee2bae1eb554764af2053a8ce49bf2d
institution Kabale University
issn 2500-2597
language English
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher National Research University Higher School of Economics
record_format Article
series Foresight and STI Governance
spelling doaj-art-0ee2bae1eb554764af2053a8ce49bf2d2025-08-20T03:56:45ZengNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsForesight and STI Governance2500-25972014-12-018410.17323/1995-459X.2014.4.6.23Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal TrapsYuri Simachev0Mikhail Kuzyk1Boris Kuznetsov2Evgeniy Pogrebnyak3Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya str., 101000 Moscow, Russian FederationHSE University; Interdepartmental Analytical Center, POB 35, Moscow 121069, Russian FederationHSE UniversityDepartment for Strategic Analysis, Vnesheconombank, 9, Akademika Sakharova prospekt, Moscow 107996, Russian Federation The article aims to discuss the practical problems and inconsistencies of industrial policy in Russia since 2000, to analyze positive and negative experiences, and to draw up some lessons which are essential for a new technology-industrial policy. The evolution of approaches to industrial policy in Russia is considered, which results particularly in convergence between innovation and industrial policies. Basic state interest groups are revealed, whose interaction determines the industrial policy design. The authors compare two recent significant industrial policies: in automotive industry and nanoindustry. On this basis, we highlight some prerequisites for successful policies. The following main lessons are drawn: First, global experience shows that the requirements for industrial policy and its opportunities change significantly with time. Such policies in any given country and at any particular point of time need new ideas and solutions; it is extremely difficult to replicate the success of different countries’ industrial policies. Second, examples of successful industrial policy typically aim to enter a foreign market, become globally competitive, and attract foreign investment. The implementation of industrial policy without definite and sufficient conditions for the free entry and exit of major players and without the participation of foreign partners is doomed to merely simulate progress, to have strong informational asymmetry, and to create antagonist images of what is actually happening in the economy in the eyes of the society and the public authorities. Third, the problem of correctly assessing the scientific and technological potential is of great importance for implementing technological-industrial policy.  Numerous assessments appear to be unreliable since they do not take into account changes in business demand for technology. The tendency to use the legacy of past decades sometimes becomes a political problem, blocking new approaches and the development of international technology co-operation. Fourth, a negative attitude towards particular policies should not be regarded as a ‘taboo’ against studying related issues. Due to the fact that for a long time in Russia it has been as if ‘there were no kind of industrial policy’, the country now has a low quality of both industrial policy and  research. https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/19369scienceindustrial policytechnology and innovation policypriority industriespriority technologiesinterest groups
spellingShingle Yuri Simachev
Mikhail Kuzyk
Boris Kuznetsov
Evgeniy Pogrebnyak
Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps
Foresight and STI Governance
science
industrial policy
technology and innovation policy
priority industries
priority technologies
interest groups
title Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps
title_full Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps
title_fullStr Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps
title_full_unstemmed Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps
title_short Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps
title_sort russia on the path towards a new technology industrial policy exciting prospects and fatal traps
topic science
industrial policy
technology and innovation policy
priority industries
priority technologies
interest groups
url https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/19369
work_keys_str_mv AT yurisimachev russiaonthepathtowardsanewtechnologyindustrialpolicyexcitingprospectsandfataltraps
AT mikhailkuzyk russiaonthepathtowardsanewtechnologyindustrialpolicyexcitingprospectsandfataltraps
AT boriskuznetsov russiaonthepathtowardsanewtechnologyindustrialpolicyexcitingprospectsandfataltraps
AT evgeniypogrebnyak russiaonthepathtowardsanewtechnologyindustrialpolicyexcitingprospectsandfataltraps