Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice
Abstract Different handling methods for laboratory mice have been intensely debated in light of refining animal husbandry. Several studies claim that tail handling is aversive, while tunnel handling seems to have a lesser impact on animal welfare. However, most of these studies investigated the effe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07384-w |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849766310472318976 |
|---|---|
| author | Neele Meyer Rebekka Gottschalk Lena Jakobi Anna-Maria Schönhoff Chadi Touma |
| author_facet | Neele Meyer Rebekka Gottschalk Lena Jakobi Anna-Maria Schönhoff Chadi Touma |
| author_sort | Neele Meyer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Different handling methods for laboratory mice have been intensely debated in light of refining animal husbandry. Several studies claim that tail handling is aversive, while tunnel handling seems to have a lesser impact on animal welfare. However, most of these studies investigated the effect of handling performed in an unusually high frequency and prolonged duration, not matching laboratory routines. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the impact of weekly cage change using tail versus tunnel handling on male and female C57BL/6J and CD-1 mice. Locomotion and exploratory activity as well as anxiety-related behaviour were measured. Moreover, the animals’ interest in social partners and social novelty as well as voluntary interaction with the handler were assessed. Reactivity and repeated activation of the HPA axis were monitored using corticosterone levels and adrenal gland and thymus weights. Only very few of the measured behavioural and stress physiological parameters differed significantly between the two handling groups, with varying direction. Our comprehensive analysis could thus reveal no consistent evidence supporting the superiority of one method over the other in terms of welfare of the handled mice. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0ea77e82691440f8b77ccf5ddfcde909 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-0ea77e82691440f8b77ccf5ddfcde9092025-08-20T03:04:38ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-07-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-07384-wLack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory miceNeele Meyer0Rebekka Gottschalk1Lena Jakobi2Anna-Maria Schönhoff3Chadi Touma4Department of Behavioural Biology, Osnabrück UniversityDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Osnabrück UniversityDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Osnabrück UniversityDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Osnabrück UniversityDepartment of Behavioural Biology, Osnabrück UniversityAbstract Different handling methods for laboratory mice have been intensely debated in light of refining animal husbandry. Several studies claim that tail handling is aversive, while tunnel handling seems to have a lesser impact on animal welfare. However, most of these studies investigated the effect of handling performed in an unusually high frequency and prolonged duration, not matching laboratory routines. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the impact of weekly cage change using tail versus tunnel handling on male and female C57BL/6J and CD-1 mice. Locomotion and exploratory activity as well as anxiety-related behaviour were measured. Moreover, the animals’ interest in social partners and social novelty as well as voluntary interaction with the handler were assessed. Reactivity and repeated activation of the HPA axis were monitored using corticosterone levels and adrenal gland and thymus weights. Only very few of the measured behavioural and stress physiological parameters differed significantly between the two handling groups, with varying direction. Our comprehensive analysis could thus reveal no consistent evidence supporting the superiority of one method over the other in terms of welfare of the handled mice.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07384-w |
| spellingShingle | Neele Meyer Rebekka Gottschalk Lena Jakobi Anna-Maria Schönhoff Chadi Touma Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice Scientific Reports |
| title | Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice |
| title_full | Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice |
| title_fullStr | Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice |
| title_short | Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice |
| title_sort | lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07384-w |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT neelemeyer lackofevidenceforaconsistentdifferentialimpactoftailandtunnelhandlingonmarkersofwelfareinlaboratorymice AT rebekkagottschalk lackofevidenceforaconsistentdifferentialimpactoftailandtunnelhandlingonmarkersofwelfareinlaboratorymice AT lenajakobi lackofevidenceforaconsistentdifferentialimpactoftailandtunnelhandlingonmarkersofwelfareinlaboratorymice AT annamariaschonhoff lackofevidenceforaconsistentdifferentialimpactoftailandtunnelhandlingonmarkersofwelfareinlaboratorymice AT chaditouma lackofevidenceforaconsistentdifferentialimpactoftailandtunnelhandlingonmarkersofwelfareinlaboratorymice |