Antimicrobial efficacy of QMix on Enterococcus faecalis infected root canals: a systematic review of in vitro studies

ObjectivesThis study aimed to summarize the outcome of in vitro studies comparing the antibacterial effectiveness of QMix with other irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.Materials and MethodsThe research question was developed by using population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study desi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Syek Hur Lim, Abhishek Parolia, Margaret Soo Yee Chia, Jayakumar Jayaraman, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2020-05-01
Series:Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rde.ac/upload/pdf/rde-45-e23.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectivesThis study aimed to summarize the outcome of in vitro studies comparing the antibacterial effectiveness of QMix with other irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.Materials and MethodsThe research question was developed by using population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design framework. The literature search was performed using 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCOhost until October 2019. The additional hand search was performed from the reference list of the eligible studies. The risk of bias of the studies was independently appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0).ResultsFourteen studies were included in this systematic review. The overall risk of bias for the selected studies was moderate. QMix was found to have a higher antimicrobial activity compared to 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), mixture of tetracycline isonomer, an acid and a detergent (MTAD), 0.2% Cetrimide, SilverSol/H2O2, HYBENX, and grape seed extract (GSE). QMix had higher antibacterial efficacy compared to NaOCl, only when used for a longer time (10 minutes) and with higher volume (above 3 mL).ConclusionsQMix has higher antibacterial activity than 17% EDTA, 2% CHX, MTAD, 0.2% Cetrimide, SilverSol/H2O2, HYBENX, GSE and NaOCl with lower concentration. To improve the effectiveness, QMix is to use for a longer time and at a higher volume.Trial RegistrationPROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews Identifier: CRD42018096763
ISSN:2234-7658
2234-7666