On economic inequality and social welfare

The aim of the paper is to explore the relations between economic inequality and social welfare staring from the assumption that causality goes from economic inequality to social welfare. Standard methodological framework of economic science was enhanced with interpersonal function of individual wel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Begović Boris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia 2015-01-01
Series:Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2015/0003-25651501023B.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849767519093522432
author Begović Boris
author_facet Begović Boris
author_sort Begović Boris
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the paper is to explore the relations between economic inequality and social welfare staring from the assumption that causality goes from economic inequality to social welfare. Standard methodological framework of economic science was enhanced with interpersonal function of individual welfare so the effects of economic inequality of the level of social welfare can be considered. It was demonstrated that there is no unequivocal theoretical conclusion and that differences in the preferences among people should be empirical considered for more insights. The analysis of the consequences of economic inequality to economic growth, i.e. dynamics of social welfare, demonstrated that there are numerous mechanisms of causality with the countervailing effects. The most important mechanism by which inequality speeds-up economic growth is based on the increased saving and invents rates, and the most important mechanism by which it slows-down growth is based on decreasing investments in human capital. Accordingly, there is no unequivocal theoretical conclusion also in this case. Nonetheless, modern growth theory has demonstrated that that the most dangerous economic growth is inequality of the treatment of economic agents, i.e. discrimination and exclusion, as that kind of inequality creates substantial allocative inefficiency.
format Article
id doaj-art-0e81edcc66a9416bba0e5af78ea0aab7
institution DOAJ
issn 0003-2565
2406-2693
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
record_format Article
series Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu
spelling doaj-art-0e81edcc66a9416bba0e5af78ea0aab72025-08-20T03:04:10ZengUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, SerbiaAnali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu0003-25652406-26932015-01-01631234010.5937/AnaliPFB1501023B0003-25651501023BOn economic inequality and social welfareBegović Boris0University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, SerbiaThe aim of the paper is to explore the relations between economic inequality and social welfare staring from the assumption that causality goes from economic inequality to social welfare. Standard methodological framework of economic science was enhanced with interpersonal function of individual welfare so the effects of economic inequality of the level of social welfare can be considered. It was demonstrated that there is no unequivocal theoretical conclusion and that differences in the preferences among people should be empirical considered for more insights. The analysis of the consequences of economic inequality to economic growth, i.e. dynamics of social welfare, demonstrated that there are numerous mechanisms of causality with the countervailing effects. The most important mechanism by which inequality speeds-up economic growth is based on the increased saving and invents rates, and the most important mechanism by which it slows-down growth is based on decreasing investments in human capital. Accordingly, there is no unequivocal theoretical conclusion also in this case. Nonetheless, modern growth theory has demonstrated that that the most dangerous economic growth is inequality of the treatment of economic agents, i.e. discrimination and exclusion, as that kind of inequality creates substantial allocative inefficiency.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2015/0003-25651501023B.pdfEconomic inequalitySocial welfareEconomic growthInterpersonal welfare functionInvestments
spellingShingle Begović Boris
On economic inequality and social welfare
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu
Economic inequality
Social welfare
Economic growth
Interpersonal welfare function
Investments
title On economic inequality and social welfare
title_full On economic inequality and social welfare
title_fullStr On economic inequality and social welfare
title_full_unstemmed On economic inequality and social welfare
title_short On economic inequality and social welfare
title_sort on economic inequality and social welfare
topic Economic inequality
Social welfare
Economic growth
Interpersonal welfare function
Investments
url http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2015/0003-25651501023B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT begovicboris oneconomicinequalityandsocialwelfare