MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty Quantification

Abstract The Mass Spectrometer and Incoherent Scatter radar (MSIS) model family has been developed and improved since the early 1970's. The most recent version of MSIS is the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) MSIS 2.0 empirical atmospheric model. NRLMSIS 2.0 provides species density, mass density...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard J. Licata, Piyush M. Mehta, Daniel R. Weimer, W. Kent Tobiska, Jean Yoshii
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-11-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003267
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536304689446912
author Richard J. Licata
Piyush M. Mehta
Daniel R. Weimer
W. Kent Tobiska
Jean Yoshii
author_facet Richard J. Licata
Piyush M. Mehta
Daniel R. Weimer
W. Kent Tobiska
Jean Yoshii
author_sort Richard J. Licata
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Mass Spectrometer and Incoherent Scatter radar (MSIS) model family has been developed and improved since the early 1970's. The most recent version of MSIS is the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) MSIS 2.0 empirical atmospheric model. NRLMSIS 2.0 provides species density, mass density, and temperature estimates as function of location and space weather conditions. MSIS models have long been a popular choice of thermosphere model in the research and operations community alike, but—like many models—does not provide uncertainty estimates. In this work, we develop an exospheric temperature model based in machine learning that can be used with NRLMSIS 2.0 to calibrate it relative to high‐fidelity satellite density estimates directly through the exospheric temperature parameter. Instead of providing point estimates, our model (called MSIS‐UQ) outputs a distribution which is assessed using a metric called the calibration error score. We show that MSIS‐UQ debiases NRLMSIS 2.0 resulting in reduced differences between model and satellite density of 25% and is 11% closer to satellite density than the Space Force's High Accuracy Satellite Drag Model. We also show the model's uncertainty estimation capabilities by generating altitude profiles for species density, mass density, and temperature. This explicitly demonstrates how exospheric temperature probabilities affect density and temperature profiles within NRLMSIS 2.0. Another study displays improved post‐storm overcooling capabilities relative to NRLMSIS 2.0 alone, enhancing the phenomena that it can capture.
format Article
id doaj-art-0e506a06924c414bbea6b710470bf3d8
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-0e506a06924c414bbea6b710470bf3d82025-01-14T16:35:33ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902022-11-012011n/an/a10.1029/2022SW003267MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty QuantificationRichard J. Licata0Piyush M. Mehta1Daniel R. Weimer2W. Kent Tobiska3Jean Yoshii4Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Enginering West Virginia University Morgantown WV USADepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Enginering West Virginia University Morgantown WV USACenter for Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA USASpace Environment Technologies Pacific Palisades CA USASpace Environment Technologies Pacific Palisades CA USAAbstract The Mass Spectrometer and Incoherent Scatter radar (MSIS) model family has been developed and improved since the early 1970's. The most recent version of MSIS is the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) MSIS 2.0 empirical atmospheric model. NRLMSIS 2.0 provides species density, mass density, and temperature estimates as function of location and space weather conditions. MSIS models have long been a popular choice of thermosphere model in the research and operations community alike, but—like many models—does not provide uncertainty estimates. In this work, we develop an exospheric temperature model based in machine learning that can be used with NRLMSIS 2.0 to calibrate it relative to high‐fidelity satellite density estimates directly through the exospheric temperature parameter. Instead of providing point estimates, our model (called MSIS‐UQ) outputs a distribution which is assessed using a metric called the calibration error score. We show that MSIS‐UQ debiases NRLMSIS 2.0 resulting in reduced differences between model and satellite density of 25% and is 11% closer to satellite density than the Space Force's High Accuracy Satellite Drag Model. We also show the model's uncertainty estimation capabilities by generating altitude profiles for species density, mass density, and temperature. This explicitly demonstrates how exospheric temperature probabilities affect density and temperature profiles within NRLMSIS 2.0. Another study displays improved post‐storm overcooling capabilities relative to NRLMSIS 2.0 alone, enhancing the phenomena that it can capture.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003267thermospheremachine learninguncertainty quantificationovercoolingexospheric temperature
spellingShingle Richard J. Licata
Piyush M. Mehta
Daniel R. Weimer
W. Kent Tobiska
Jean Yoshii
MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty Quantification
Space Weather
thermosphere
machine learning
uncertainty quantification
overcooling
exospheric temperature
title MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty Quantification
title_full MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty Quantification
title_fullStr MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty Quantification
title_full_unstemmed MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty Quantification
title_short MSIS‐UQ: Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model With Uncertainty Quantification
title_sort msis uq calibrated and enhanced nrlmsis 2 0 model with uncertainty quantification
topic thermosphere
machine learning
uncertainty quantification
overcooling
exospheric temperature
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003267
work_keys_str_mv AT richardjlicata msisuqcalibratedandenhancednrlmsis20modelwithuncertaintyquantification
AT piyushmmehta msisuqcalibratedandenhancednrlmsis20modelwithuncertaintyquantification
AT danielrweimer msisuqcalibratedandenhancednrlmsis20modelwithuncertaintyquantification
AT wkenttobiska msisuqcalibratedandenhancednrlmsis20modelwithuncertaintyquantification
AT jeanyoshii msisuqcalibratedandenhancednrlmsis20modelwithuncertaintyquantification